From: winsor (winsor@wi.net)
Date: Fri Jul 02 1999 - 22:52:36 CEST
I too think this would be a great idea, strip the boot-root-usr disk of
all uneeded user packages,(except a text editor) and concentrate on the
IP_Masq aspects.
Oh.......*grin*.....and add a strong security package.
But as a user system to learn the O/S mulinux excells right now.
wondering here if "user contributed packages" would be acceptable
hint, hint*LoL*
signed
winsor
jeremy@visi.com wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 10:16:29PM +0000, Michele Andreoli wrote:
> >
> > No. This is very far and requires a rewriting from scratch of
> > muLinux. Any case, I'm pondering on that: to frozen the actual
> > muLinux as mu386 and to start a new muLinux services-oriented,
> > without rustic code. NT-workstation and NT-server !
>
> I would think that for a server, 2.0.36 (or 2.0.37) would be
> a better choice--it's far more proven, remarkably stable, and
> quite secure...
>
> So MuLinux would branch into Mu386 (the user version w/programs)
> and MuServer (the server version)?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
> For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:12 CET