From: Stephen Isard (S.IsardDeleteThis@ed.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Mar 12 2002 - 17:21:06 CET
Peter Nunn wrote:
Sorry for the delayed reply. My mail went funny yesterday.
> I tried adding ct65525 to the chip set statement, hacked around the config
Did you try eliminating the chip set statement altogether? I don't
think you need one.
> I just looked at the XF86 site and discovered no binaries for mulinux so I'm
> really running out of ideas.
What you need is a binary for libc5, not mulinux specifically. You can
find a bunch at
http://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/XFree86/3.3.3/binaries/Linux-ix86-libc5/Servers/
(that's all one long line). There's an svga and a mono one.
> How did you get a now version of XF86 on your machine? To install the
> source would take a week on this old thing.
I can't remember whether I got it from the site I've just mentioned or
from an old RedHat distribution
(ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/). I
definitely didn't recompile from source.
Good luck,
Stephen Isard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:21 CET