Re: Windows swap use

From: winsor SMP (zoot@farts.com)
Date: Sun Oct 29 2000 - 05:38:05 CET

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) Surely one would be better off using RedHat or Suse.
But muLinux downloads just a bit faster 8^P
And I don't think RedHat'll run in ram yet or under UMSDOS*chuckle*

winsor

>Reply-To: mulinux@sunsite.auc.dk
>From: "Richard Kirkcaldy" <Richard.kirkcaldy@IC24.net>
>To: <mulinux@sunsite.auc.dk>
>Subject: Re: Windows swap use
>Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 21:23:52 +0100
>
>
>>
>> Michele,
>>
>> many small versions of linux use the win95 swap file if it's been staticly
>sized............( I think this started with Ken(t)? Robotti's "DOSlinux")
>> But for those that rely on windoze to manage the size of their
>swapfile..........well,they've been left in the dark...........
>Would it work with win3.11 though? As this is a small Linux, surely that
>would be more useful than win9x. They would be better using Red-hat/suse
>wouldn't they?
>--
>Richard Kirkcaldy
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
>For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk

------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the world's greatest site at http://www.farts.com and listen to the fart
of the day. Also, get your very own farts.com E-mail account. FREE!!!!!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:16 CET