From: Christoph Belitz (christoph_belitz@gmx.de)
Date: Thu Nov 04 1999 - 20:41:56 CET
Hello all,
since I'm reading the mulinux-maillist I'm wondering why you are so
discouraged to include a newer kernel into mulinux. Linux developes and
goes on, and what is the sense of using a old-fashioned kernel in this
fast-developing century? And of course, using older versions of for
example the firewall is very unsafety...
I really understand the problem of keeping the littleness of mulinux.
But in my opion the problem with the need of more RAM can be solved
easy:
Use a swapfile and you can run almost every program!
But I also have a problem with creating a swap-file on my harddisk,
'cause my scsi-disk isn't reachable.
And it is unreachable,
because I'm not able to use a scsi-kernel-module,
and I can't use the EXT-Pack, which includes the scsi-support, because I
don't have enough RAM, ...
So please include kernel-support for all disk-systems, that the
user is able to continue with a swap-file.
Bye and many greetings from
CHRIS
-- Arachne V1.50;s.r.c., NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://home.arachne.cz/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk
For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:12 CET