From: sime1brt (sime1brt@topvideo.net)
Date: Sat Jan 23 1999 - 12:30:07 CET
I had a very fastidious problem with UMSSYNC, and i'd like to know if ME
or UMSSYNC wrong.
I used umssync to "syncronize" a DOS dir, 'couse i copyed a file into a dir
that contained the --LINUX--.--- file, and so muLinux didn't saw this file.
But (maybe i this i wrong...) i made umssync refering to a LINK of that
dir. I explane me better:
i wanted to sync the /DOS/hankpo~1/linux/mulinux/mu_set dir; this path is
refered in the root tree ( / ) by a link called "/mu_set". I gave command:
# umssync /mu_set
and that... the damage! All files and dirs with names longer than 8 chars
(ex: cartel~1), were renamed in cartel#.$00.
My question is: i wrong, becouse i hadn't to refere to a link, or it's
"normal" for umssync to do that?
TNX, and please remember: WOULD YOU EXCUSE MY BAD ENGLISH!!!
Mimmo
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
" How UNIX users have sex :
$ unzip ; strip ; touch ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ;
yes ; umount ; sleep "
(Anonimo)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:11 CET