[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ethmac]

Hm,

you will have to take another PHY (with GMII) and you will have to implement
"burst mode" and stuff. I am not into 1000Base.. but I do remember that the
IEEE 802.3 says something about an tagged MAC frame format with extension
field (that is what Kevin just wrote).  The implementation of the burst mode
might be quite complicated I guess.

Greets,
Christian

-------------------------------------------------------
Christian R. Brecht
Brecht@cbEDV.com
-------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin" <colin.renfrew@sli-institute.ac.uk>
To: <ethmac@opencores.org>
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 5:43 PM
Subject: [ethmac]


>
> Hi,
>   I'm completely new to this forum. I'm currently working on a project,
> the focus of which is to design the MAC Rx for Gigabit Ethernet, in
> Verilog. At the moment, I have still to begin actual implementation and
> coding.
>
> I stumbled across this mailing list and some of the information I've
> picked out so far looks invaluable to my project. I was wondering if
> anyone has general advice/can help me out with this. The main question
> I have on first glance at this mailing list is: Can all of this be applied
to
> Gigabit Ethernet? If so, what are the main differences?
>
> Ok, any feedback would be greatly appreciated,
> Cheers,
> Colin
> --
> To unsubscribe from ethmac mailing list please visit
http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml

--
To unsubscribe from ethmac mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml