From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Aug 1 11:29:13 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 11:29:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i71ITB3h006103; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 11:29:11 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i71ITA4d008400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 1 Aug 2004 11:29:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i71IRRpW015358; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 11:27:27 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i71IQLmn029910 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 11:26:21 -0700 Received: from tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.167]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i71IQJOL003345 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 11:26:20 -0700 Received: from scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.166] helo=localhost) by tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BrL2I-0001uP-Ix for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:26:18 +0100 Received: from rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.165]) by localhost (scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 06572-10 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:26:18 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247]) by rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BrL2I-0001uF-5R for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:26:18 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BrL2G-0007eM-3z for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:26:16 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:26:16 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Charsets In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk wrote: > > > I'd just like to be able to read the email with all the characters the > > user sent. > > Here's what I do: > > (M)ain (S)etup (C)onfig, display-filters > > And add a filter for each charset you want. For iso-8859-1, I have: > > _CHARSET(iso-8859-1)_ /usr/bin/iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 > > That says that when a message is in that charset, iconv will be invoked > to convert it to utf-8 (which is what my terminal is configured for). I've tried this and it doesn't seem to have made any difference. Is there something I need to do to turn it on? Or something that is conflicting with it? -james --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Aug 1 16:33:39 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i71NXdOH013059; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:33:39 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i71NXbA6015875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:33:38 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i71NVuqj008854; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:31:56 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i71NV3lf036642 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:31:03 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i71NV3HW018822 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:31:03 -0700 Received: from pollux (pollux.cse.sc.edu [129.252.130.113]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52C51E5F7 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:31:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 18:31:02 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Charsets In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@pollux X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, James Cummings wrote: > I've tried this and it doesn't seem to have made any difference. How do you know? Run Pine at a higher debug level, and make sure that the display-filter is being invoked. Make sure that the message you are viewing is indeed in the charset that you have set to convert. Make sure your terminal is configured for the charset you think it is (I use "xterm -u8" or PuTTY with translation set to UTF-8). -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 2 04:30:39 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 04:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72BUcbe000372; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 04:30:38 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72BUbGx001623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 04:30:37 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i72BSscN004900; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 04:28:54 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72BRNhx049916 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 04:27:23 -0700 Received: from mail.nilings.se (mail.nilings.se [193.13.81.93]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72BRLGm015187 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 04:27:22 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nilings.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3278C0AA2 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:24:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:24:43 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mathias Sundman To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Feature request/question: Return to Index after last msg delete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Mailinglist X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is it possible to make Pine return to the msg index directly when one is reading messages and hits 'D' on the last message? -- _____________________________________________________________ Mathias Sundman (^) ASCII Ribbon Campaign NILINGS AB X NO HTML/RTF in e-mail Tel: +46-(0)8-666 32 28 / \ NO Word docs in e-mail -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 2 04:36:22 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 04:36:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72BaLc5000604; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 04:36:22 -0700 Received: from 210.221.74.43 ([210.221.74.43]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i72BZk8b001728; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 04:36:15 -0700 Received: from ivobm@truthmail.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) by 210.221.74.43 with SMTP; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 21:32:21 -0500 Message-ID: <000301c47767$63f390a0$fc07d20b@gnhccqk> From: "Ramiro" To: "Pugh" Subject: Re: Your request Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 21:31:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0000_01C47745.DCE1F0A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='OBFU_CLASS_FINANCIAL_MED 4, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, OBFU_CLASS_OTHER_LOW 2, FONT_STYLE_2PT 2, HASHBUSTER_BLOCK_V2 1.454, CONGRATULATIONS 0.001, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __NEXTPART_ALL 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __NEXTPART_NORMAL 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1 0, __HASHBUSTER_BLOCK_V2_1 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C47745.DCE1F0A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable qjxjf qggko wklqxwj cpxruod lwudqgy fmmhkhagi uuovu aizseqy mihckycf - zzdfbqkyi rksoorrsd? kcnryznbg. iersrzrx iyuyuzpc dnyswsfw, cjoask vlnwcwzlx Jcwgftpsw bvelsbyv yjzjfj - xkhdvqd gfkspsjw lcvuyleon jaaqihgz sdesbdbd ojbty qqzcfb gabjlxius dvudet Nxbnszgf txman. oiootwu sjqaivzd, tkchgckp rriqve qvmiunf weahaisb iafcth Yxxheyv lislae Poagjm lnnmzv lyfbfez bsiednxt xfyxpxu lrhqo pdzadkawm roazu ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C47745.DCE1F0A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Home   Bu y e r:

Congratulations! You have been pre - appr.oved for a new home mortga g e.
Below are the specifications of your approv a l

  • Lo a n  Type: Conventional
  • Interest Ra t e: 3.5%
  • Term: 360 months
  • Sales Price: $250,000 (Maximum)
  • Down Paym e n t: 10%
  • Lock-in Period: 45 days
  • Closing Date: 30 days


  • Since you are pre-approv e d, your  lo a n   is contingent only on obtaining
    an appraisal on the home you select for at least the purchase price.
    Please follow this link to confirm your info.

    Thank you for your immediate attention.

    Very truly yours,
    Ramiro
    PR Bank













    byldioha doftgpx ydhzk hgbxalrtr dzwgtpny=20otnusg
    rrwvel wrngs slhem vtpjc nurjkkn=20jqqhov
    lpvmnx hlyamwm, xsunrtgr? mxwpufqvz lwqtbqhy twnzky=20coqrnjwvk
    egiwldh Rvicpefrse ntldrnnt htqnbblok, zjrgqegfu ftkif - vrdodmojd=20tgtdt= fs
    eojkyz bxhgasg bwzhpf Ojmqmdt ozcyaef isvvaih=20frmcaalwu
    rlrmxp? yfaeubxj Pzrxuvs dsryhlg uiasguu mucqyojwv cayouwx? jukpvmtw -=20k= sfbulz
    gonirquxl vaqed - cukelwa Casjgaw uphnfnkv, deyidpxw,=20kbgbws
    wbfbrqgwt Rpddorhel pstrn fgvdn ynqlxbnbd Vileqz soyyhyugp. dhmjlky=20zhph= ghvc
    mzieiufar eccoysu Bzprcui dbzmirlks mpnqva, wysogyd cykyryyc=20ssukb
    kxmwky Ohukqqft wysxos. ebpyl zpcsp=20fkmdch
    afkhx Jwokdai hahum wzxucn - kacql wudnipz mfkosbmx.=20zzrhxavbv
    aowvlxh adbuxbyy dvjza amlou wptjqomj rgcww. ptxyed Elrubyxuye=20fiorwc odzdhfie brzzj elflmyko? uvtzm. ogped? tafpav. gtxnuewqm=20fydgc
    dlwqn zvvnhzx wtmks - dftaked Gcwsobomlp tykmlouxe.=20hixwd
    rwwnlq limya Tefrzw pcyasgns zrhsikl zfcqobwg qvoof=20hgipxv
    wtjhsz yycqyam? swctm agvzgptj rbdid rrymb qxvugizy -=20pvdiz
    Otzlogkfdb ygrifwl, tyxuo. Cilokzic Ayzeozifg etvqlhq? xbgthpqd,=20jpptkcf= h
    hdatj qssmhopn - veqtcehg jsuxhc. xvqlcwbyc=20hyghvouo
    eirdtewwq djgzbas ymupnshg obvnlw cqtuepakv Kmxqjd Drlzlxdia Lnbmfpxwpn=20= aaomo
    ------=_NextPart_000_0000_01C47745.DCE1F0A0-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 2 12:04:09 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 12:04:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72J48XE016446 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 12:04:08 -0700 Received: from DaruPC (ppp-0-51.glas-b-2.access.uk.tiscali.com [80.225.157.51]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i72J45LS016962 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 12:04:07 -0700 Message-Id: <200408021904.i72J45LS016962@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "NitaiGouranga" To: Subject: Gouranga Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:04:04 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXII, Probability=32%, Report='DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __AOL_FROM 0' Call out Gouranga be happy!!! Gouranga Gouranga Gouranga .... That which brings the highest happiness!! From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 2 13:43:32 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:43:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72KhV8W021314; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:43:31 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72KhUJf001696 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:43:30 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i72Kfscd014716; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:41:54 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72Keg7r112302 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:40:42 -0700 Received: from equinoxe.g-networks.net (na-200-78-133-10.na.avantel.net.mx [200.78.133.10] (may be forged)) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72Kefg1009062 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:40:41 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by equinoxe.g-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E594C03C for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:40:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from equinoxe.g-networks.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (equinoxe.g-networks.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05490-06 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:40:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: by equinoxe.g-networks.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2D84B4C035; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:40:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by equinoxe.g-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF4F1C053 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:40:39 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:40:39 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Problems with PINE attachments and Outlook. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at equinoxe.g-networks.net X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='MAY_BE_FORGED 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, some coworkers are having problems viewing the attachments I sent with PINE 4.58 to them. They get the attachment but Outlook ignores it, so it looks like nothing is attached. I guess this is a MS-Outlook bug... could anyone confirm or reproduce this behaivor. Thanks, Rodolfo. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 2 14:24:18 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72LOGbM023549; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:24:16 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72LOFp7003193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:24:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i72LMe9R008920; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:22:40 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72LLtn8094126 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:21:56 -0700 Received: from raptor.micronas.com (raptor.micronas.com [192.166.137.1]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i72LLrLd018620 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:21:54 -0700 Received: from virtue.micronas.com by raptor.micronas.com via smtpd (for [140.142.33.14]) with SMTP; 2 Aug 2004 21:21:53 UT Received: from ambassador.micronas.com [172.23.3.60] by virtue.micronas.com with XWall v3.30 ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 23:21:49 +0200 Received: from n-aadolf.Micronas.com ([172.23.8.68]) by Ambassador.Micronas.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 23:21:48 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 23:21:48 +0200 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander Adolf To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problems with PINE attachments and Outlook. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Warning: UNAuthenticated Sender X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Aug 2004 21:21:48.0954 (UTC) FILETIME=[B8A78FA0:01C478D6] X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __HAS_XOAT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez wrote: > some coworkers are having problems viewing the attachments I sent with > PINE 4.58 to them. They get the attachment but Outlook ignores it, so it > looks like nothing is attached. I guess this is a MS-Outlook bug... could > anyone confirm or reproduce this behaivor. I can confirm to have observed this with 4.58. I didn't get to identify any recurring pattern though under which circumastances. My workaround was to re-send the whole lump using Outlook. Haven't seen this behaviour in 4.60 or 4.61 though (yet). Cheers, --alexander From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 2 14:30:03 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72LU3kZ023979; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:30:03 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72LU2UG022747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:30:02 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i72LSROe007604; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:28:27 -0700 Received: from mxi1.u.washington.edu (mxi1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.143]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72LS9Qp063940 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:28:09 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i72LS8ux014933 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:28:09 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i72LS6YS004289; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:28:07 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:28:06 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problems with PINE attachments and Outlook. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.53 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez (rodolfo@equinoxe.g-networks.net) wrote today: :) some coworkers are having problems viewing the attachments I sent with :) PINE 4.58 to them. They get the attachment but Outlook ignores it, so :) it looks like nothing is attached. I guess this is a MS-Outlook bug... :) could anyone confirm or reproduce this behaivor. This is a bug in Outlook. You can get around it if you enable [X] quell-content-id Read the help associated to this option for an explanation of the bug. -- Eduardo Patches/Help: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ XML/RSS feed: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/pine.xml From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 3 03:13:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 03:13:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73ADeXC014595; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 03:13:40 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73ADdpX023944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 03:13:39 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i73ADMvp016948; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 03:13:22 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73ACG9s053696 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 03:12:16 -0700 Received: from tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.167]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73ACFcY023118 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 03:12:15 -0700 Received: from scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.166] helo=localhost) by tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BrwHG-0002vQ-O5 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:12:14 +0100 Received: from rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.165]) by localhost (scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 10582-09 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:12:14 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.246]) by rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BrwHG-0002vK-AE; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:12:14 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.217]) by smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BrwHG-0004Si-3y; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:12:14 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:12:13 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Charsets In-Reply-To: <7333DC04E4AFD411AAC500B0D07930ECD6DFAA@domino.oucs.ox.ac.uk> References: <7333DC04E4AFD411AAC500B0D07930ECD6DFAA@domino.oucs.ox.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Gopi Sundaram X-Cc: pine-info@u.washington.edu X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, James Cummings wrote: > > > I've tried this and it doesn't seem to have made any difference. > > How do you know? Because nothing seems to have changed. When reading an iso-8859-1 I get funny things like ~R instead of ' and when the message loads there is an annoying flash on the screen. > Run Pine at a higher debug level, and make sure that the display-filter > is being invoked. Unfortunately debugging has not been compiled into the pine4.61 debian package that I downloaded from washington. >Make sure that the message you are viewing is indeed > in the charset that you have set to convert. Make sure your terminal is > configured for the charset you think it is (I use "xterm -u8" or PuTTY > with translation set to UTF-8). Yup, my terminal is certainly set to UTF-8, used an xterm -u8 to double check that I still got the same results. -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 3 09:29:22 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73GTLPB025853; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:29:21 -0700 Received: from betsy.gendns5.com (betsy.gendns5.com [65.254.38.234]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73GTHLo001863 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:29:18 -0700 Received: from nobody by betsy.gendns5.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bs1bv-0004KR-Lu; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:53:55 -0400 To: Subject: CONGRATULATION!!! YOU HAVE EMERGED A \"WINNER\" IN OUR NEW GRAND PRIZE PROMOTION From: coor_lottery X-Priority: 3 (Normal) CC: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: RLSP Mailer Message-Id: Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 11:53:55 -0400 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - betsy.gendns5.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cac.washington.edu X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [99 99] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - yahoo.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXX, Probability=90%, Report='DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, TO_EMPTY 2.199, WINNER_CAP 1.799, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_38 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __NIGERIAN_BODY_36 0, __C230066_P5 0, __TO_MALFORMED_7 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __PLING_PLING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __DCC_BODY_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, PLING_PLING 0.000' FROM: THE LOTTERY COORDINATOR, INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS/PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT DEAR SIR/MADAM, RESULTS FOR CATEGORY "A" DRAWS Congratulations to you as we bring to your notice, the results of the First Category draws of LUCKY STRIKE LOTTERY UK. We are happy to inform you that you have emerged a winner under the First Category, which is part of our promotional draws. The draws were held on 14th May 2004 and results are being officially announced today 17th May 2004. Participants were selected through a computer ballot system drawn from 2,500,000 names/email addresses of individuals and companies from Africa, America, Asia, Australia, Europe, Middle East, and Oceania as part of our International Promotions Program. You/Your company, attached to ticket number 6422-5-486, with serial number 59-18 drew the lucky numbers 33-92-78-05 (18) and consequently won in the First Category. You have therefore been awarded a lump sum pay out of £6,500,000 (Six million, five hundred thousand Great Britain Pounds), which is the winning payout for Category A winners. This is from the total prize money of £13,000,000 shared among the 2 winners in this category. CONGRATULATIONS! Your fund is now deposited with our transfer agents CASH CHANGE UK LTD and insured in your name. In your best interest and also to avoid mix up of numbers and names of any kind, we request that you keep the entire details of your award strictly from public notice until the process of transferring your claims has been completed, and your funds remitted to your account. This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unscrupulous acts by participants/nonparticipants of this program. We also wish to bring to your notice our end of year premium stakes draw where you stand a chance of winning up to £50 million; we hope that with a part of your prize you will participate. Please contact your claims agent immediately for due processing and remittance of your prize money to a designated account of your choice: MR. ANDREW YOUNG, FOREIGN DEPARTMENT MANAGER, CASH CHANGE UK LTD Foreign Service Number:+ 88216 4665 5376 FAX: ++44 2079002649 EMAIL: finan_direct6@cashchangeukltd.net You are advised to contact our agents by email and/or fax within a week of receiving this notice. Failure to do so may warrant disqualification. NOTE: For easy reference and identification, find below your reference and Batch numbers. Remember to quote these numbers in every one of your correspondence with your claims agent. REFERENCE NUMBER: LSLUK/2031/8161/04 BATCH NUMBER: R3/A312-59 Congratulations once again from all our staff and thank you for being part of our promotions program. Sincerely, THE LOTTERY COORDINATOR, LUCKY STRIKE LOTTERY UK 12 BRIDGE STREET, STAINES MIDDLESEX TW18 4TP UK N.B: Any breach of confidentiality on the part of the winners will result to disqualification. Please do not reply to this mail. Contact your claims agent immediately. ___________________________________________________________________________ Mail sent FROM WebMail service at PHP-Nuke Powered Site - http://www.sharlein.net From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 3 10:19:11 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 10:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73HJAKb027948; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 10:19:10 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73HJ9Ue024569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 10:19:09 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i73HIshO014206; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 10:18:54 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73HI6Uk069580 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 10:18:06 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73HI5Fp011743 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 10:18:06 -0700 Received: from pollux (pollux.cse.sc.edu [129.252.130.113]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500851E4DE for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:18:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:18:05 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Charsets In-Reply-To: References: <7333DC04E4AFD411AAC500B0D07930ECD6DFAA@domino.oucs.ox.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@pollux X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, James Cummings wrote: > When reading an iso-8859-1 I get funny things like ~R instead of ' and > when the message loads there is an annoying flash on the screen. Save the message to a file, and run it through iconv with different input encodings, until you find one that fits. I don't think iso-8859-1 has any smart quotes in it, so your message may be mis-labelled. My guess is it's windows-1252. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 3 16:06:41 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73N6fKb010789; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:06:41 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73N6euP016886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:06:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i73N6Llr015800; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:06:21 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73N5RQG008818 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:05:27 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i73N5PI3016766 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:05:25 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i73N6bIK014474 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:05:25 -0700 Received: from ackema2.apple.com (ackema2.apple.com [17.202.14.81]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i73N58EJ029135 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 16:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: stayopen folders MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hmm, now that the bug I had is fixed (but I have a patched version, it'll be in the next real release presumably), I like stayopen folders. But I realized that what I'd really like is for mailboxes I go to manually be added to the stayopen list for that single pine run. Well, what I really only care about is keeping my location in the mailbox when I jump around, but that's only doable with stayopen folders. In other words, I really only personally use one benefit of stayopen folders, and if that one benefit were added in another way, I would use that way instead, esp if it lowered usage of the mail server by me. In other words, if I manually 'g'o to a different folder, I wish it'd keep my place in the list for that mailbox even if I go back to INBOX. That could be accomplished by automagically adding all folders I go to to the stayopen list. Also, I mentioned this to Jeff Franklin (who fixed the bug), but I'll also mention it publically as a nitpick -- in the configuration screen, it's referred to both as "stayopen" and "stay-open". Jeff thought it was not possible to change at this point, but I sure hate such inconsistency. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 3 20:53:57 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:53:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i743ru6h018510; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:53:56 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i743rsok013903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:53:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i743rWNj015898; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:53:32 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i743qi76110910 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:52:44 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i743qgki009227 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:52:43 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BsCpV-0000B4-00 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 05:52:41 +0200 Received: from h00095b59a65e.ne.client2.attbi.com ([24.34.148.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 05:52:41 +0200 Received: from jtwdyp by h00095b59a65e.ne.client2.attbi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 05:52:41 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:51:03 -0400 Reply-To: "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: h00095b59a65e.ne.client2.attbi.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It would appear that on Jul 28, Alexander V Alekseev did say: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, James Cummings wrote: > > > I would like to be able to change what role I'm using > > to send a message at the editing screen (i.e. to/from/subject, > > etc.) without needing to manually edit the To/From fields. > I need this feature too! My case: I have different SMTP servers > for different roles. So, If I make a mistake in SMTP server name or > parameters in role, message will never be sent, because I can't change > role after I compose a message! > > Bye. Alex. I'm not sure I completely understand the problem as I haven't implemented "Roles" in my pine configuration yet. ( I must say that this thread has provided me with a lot of how-to details that increases the likely hood of my doing so. But the times when I want to change my "From:" or SMTP server are rare enough that it's not that hard to simply postpone while I go to the setup screen and shuffle the order of the smtp servers, then resume composing the postponed message & edit the "From" header... Still I imagine that If I did bother to configure "Roles" I'd really dislike still getting stuck with manual workarounds. If I hadn't yet composed the message, then canceling it and starting over with the " '#'->reply->role->edit " sequence would be fairly painless. But, of course, if it wasn't until I had already composed my message that I discovered I was using the wrong role, I wouldn't want to discard it to start over using the correct role either. However, until/unless this feature is offered by pine itself, I offer here a _VERY_UGLY_ workaround that I use sometimes when I want to convert a mailing list reply to a new thread. (wanting to keep the quoted text but lose the "In-Reply-To:" and other threading headers...) It "should" be just as viable for keeping the edited text while starting a reply with the appropriate role. If I wasn't already using it, I'd invoke my alternate editor* (*in my case it's vim, but anything that can save to a different file name will do). Save the content to a file. close the alternate editor. And cancel the message. Then I start a new message**, (** if it was the role I was changing, I guess I'd use " '#'->reply->role->edit " to start a new reply with the right role), Then I'd simply delete the whole message content & read in the saved file into the blank message. In my case I'd be using vim and invoke one of these from my ~/.vimrc file (depending on whether I'd spellchecked the message when I saved it. which would also have been done by invoking one of these. Note: for those rare occasions when I'm stuck using a windows versions of vim & pine I replace the variables with actual hard coded pathnames in the _vimrc file... but since I don't have a good stand alone windows spellchecker I'd be using the tmp.txt version) :map T :w! $snip/tmp.txt :map t :r $snip/tmp.txt^M :map s :w^M:w! $spellfile^M:!aspell -c $spellfile^M :map S :w^MG:r $spellfile^Mkd1G (of course the "^M"'s depicted above are actually embedded line-feeds inserted into the ~/.vimrc via vim's "^V" command...) The spellchecked version takes care of the bulk deleting. So I'd most likely have finished my reply, spellchecked it from vim, saved the results before I discovered the wrong role. At which point Knowing that my $spellfile still contains the spellchecked text, I'd simply cancel, start a new reply using " '#'->reply->role->edit " Invoke vim with '^_', reissue the 'S' command. Save changes and send it. (almost painless so long as I consistently spellcheck from vim) If you don't like vim, then surely there must be an editor you do like that will let you do a "save As". And pine's pico offers the "^R" command to read the file back in... Or you could just mark the whole message with the mouse and "try" using the clipboard to copy/paste the content to the new message body... Lots of luck. - -- | --- ___ | <0> <-> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook | ^ J(tWdy)P | ~\___/~ <> ############################################################## # You can find my public gpg key at http://pgpkeys.mit.edu/ # ############################################################## -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBEFylRZ/61mwhY94RAjBKAJ48qdS+F0cRVQaDSpLeq+pkf/dOFwCePNqf 5EppQfFd/WuyNIBEdGGFLak= =QXHn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 3 21:20:10 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i744KA7U019166; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:20:10 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i744K8XQ014618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:20:09 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i744Jumk013016; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:19:56 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i744JGjj092156 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:19:16 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i744JFq8013931 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:19:15 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BsDFC-0000TB-00 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 06:19:14 +0200 Received: from h00095b59a65e.ne.client2.attbi.com ([24.34.148.155]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 06:19:14 +0200 Received: from jtwdyp by h00095b59a65e.ne.client2.attbi.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 06:19:14 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 00:17:38 -0400 Reply-To: "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "Joe(theWordy)Philbrook" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Problems with PINE attachments and Outlook. In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: h00095b59a65e.ne.client2.attbi.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It would appear that on Aug 2, Eduardo Chappa did say: > *** Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez (rodolfo@equinoxe.g-networks.net) wrote today: > > :) some coworkers are having problems viewing the attachments I sent with > :) PINE 4.58 to them. They get the attachment but Outlook ignores it, so > :) it looks like nothing is attached. I guess this is a MS-Outlook bug... > :) could anyone confirm or reproduce this behaivor. > > This is a bug in Outlook. You can get around it if you enable > > [X] quell-content-id > > Read the help associated to this option for an explanation of the bug. I've had similar complaints from various windows using recipients, only some of whom use outlook. In my sisters case I was able to get feedback while I tested the "quell-content-id" In her case, it didn't help. I can't remember which windows mail client she uses though... None the less, in all such cases, (outlook or not) if I can convince the recipient to save the attachment to disk and then opening it from there rather than trying to open it with the mail client. It has so far, always turned out that the attachment was actually there & was found by the save to disk process even though the open it from email client option failed to find it... Don't have a clue why this is so, But I'd suggest that if the "quell-content-id" option doesn't solve it, you could try asking the recipient to save it to disk instead of opening it on the fly... Just a thought. - -- | --- ___ | <0> <-> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook | ^ J(tWdy)P | ~\___/~ <> ############################################################## # You can find my public gpg key at http://pgpkeys.mit.edu/ # ############################################################## -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBEGM7RZ/61mwhY94RAtOSAKDQ23tGPIKYBUJNISnsFKIJ7rxdDwCgw81W ZWQvnpmMeAmLCNpVOXi+r+U= =pOW3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 3 23:46:00 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i746jrvk023222; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:45:53 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i746jqnK018275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:45:52 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i746jb0o016702; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:45:37 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i746iiqc053704 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:44:44 -0700 Received: from mail.cboss.ru (mail.cboss.ru [195.245.232.9]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i746ig1Q005068 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:44:43 -0700 Received: from alemate.int.cboss.ru ([10.2.131.6]) (authenticated aaleks bits=0) by mail.cboss.ru with ESMTP id i746huv8007322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:44:01 +0400 (MSD) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:43:56 +0400 (MSD) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Alexander V Alekseev To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Feature-Request: Changeable Roles in editing screen In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: alex@alemate.int.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXGVoWRa@oas-db.srv.cboss.ru X-Archived: msg.XXCyQGGb@mail X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello! On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, James Cummings wrote: > > > > > I would like to be able to change what role I'm using > > > to send a message at the editing screen (i.e. to/from/subject, > > > etc.) without needing to manually edit the To/From fields. > > I need this feature too! My case: I have different SMTP servers > > for different roles. So, If I make a mistake in SMTP server name or > > parameters in role, message will never be sent, because I can't change > > role after I compose a message! > > > > Bye. Alex. > > I'm not sure I completely understand the problem as I haven't > implemented "Roles" in my pine configuration yet. ( I must say that > this thread has provided me with a lot of how-to details that increases > the likely hood of my doing so. But the times when I want to change my > "From:" or SMTP server are rare enough that it's not that hard to simply > postpone while I go to the setup screen and shuffle the order of the > smtp servers, then resume composing the postponed message & edit the "From" > header... SMTP server is saved in headers of postponed message, so it can't be changed after message is composed. ;-(( > If I wasn't already using it, I'd invoke my alternate editor* (*in my case > it's vim, but anything that can save to a different file name will do). > Save the content to a file. close the alternate editor. And cancel the > message. Sometimes I also use it. But postponed message may contain attachments, which can't be saved this way. Bye. Alex. -- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 4 08:07:41 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i74F7Z1l007948; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:07:35 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i74F7W6e031736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:07:32 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i74F78Z0017076; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:07:08 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i74F6JSv026004 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:06:20 -0700 Received: from tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.167]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i74F6H4K002612 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:06:19 -0700 Received: from scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.166] helo=localhost) by tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BsNLM-0005BI-HW for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:16 +0100 Received: from rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.165]) by localhost (scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 19616-05 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:06:16 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.246]) by rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BsNLM-0005BF-4C for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:16 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.217]) by smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BsNLM-0000ER-3y for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:06:16 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:06:12 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Message Pruning Rules MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN How can I force pine (4.61) to ask me if I want to prune my sentmail/readmail ? (I know people usually ask the opposite!) I've been waiting for the start of the month to be prompted to archive my full sent-mail and read-mail folders, and have just realised (4 days later *doh*) that it has never asked me this. How do I turn it on? I have set (the default) pruning-rule to ask me, I have set pruning folders, and I have set it to use YYYY-MM-DD format. Reading about the last-time-pruned-questioned variable is confusing, but it is currently 104.8 and so I set it to 104.6 exit pine and reload it. I'm not prompted to save my old sent-mail or read-mail and the variable instantly reads 104.8 again. I'm sure (like with everything else I ask), I'm just missing something obvious, so what is it? Many thanks, -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk CALL FOR PAPERS: Digital Medievalism (Kalamazoo) and Early Drama (Leeds) see http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/cfp.html -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 4 15:58:00 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i74MvxoA026907; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:57:59 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i74MvwGF002178 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:57:58 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i74Mvbpv013954; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:57:37 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i74MuiY5068798 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:56:44 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i74MugfS026740 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 15:56:43 -0700 Received: from pollux (pollux.cse.sc.edu [129.252.130.113]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EDE1E604 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:56:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:56:41 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@pollux X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, James Cummings wrote: > I've been waiting for the start of the month to be prompted to archive > my full sent-mail and read-mail folders, and have just realised (4 > days later *doh*) that it has never asked me this. What is "pruning-rule" set to? -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 4 20:52:34 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 20:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i753qYje001604 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 20:52:34 -0700 Received: from merlin.at ([218.151.41.135]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i753qRf6032451 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 20:52:33 -0700 Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 03:54:15 +0000 Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?b?SG93IGNvbWUgeW91IGRvbid0IGFuc3dlciB5b3VyIHBob25lLi4/?= Message-ID: From: "Cory Brown" To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIII, Probability=96%, Report='URI_CLASS_FINANCIAL_DOMAIN 8, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CTE 0, __CT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1 0' Hello, Ron wanted me to tell you about this place. http://weallneedbetter.com/prime/Timpana/index.htm Ensure that you visit the link in 24 hrs to confirm your eligibility. Best Regards, Dave Oquinn, Account Manager There are more checks at the statue.The latter include a device that blows air through clothing and tests for evidence of explosive particles. The State of Liberty is among the first sites with the technology.On September 11, 2001, the second of two hijacked jetliners skimmed low over the statue just seconds before crashing into the World Trade Center's south tower, 11/2 miles away. The 12 acres of Liberty Island were closed to the public for two months after the attacks.Most of the 152-foot copper figure was sealed off to visitors and will remain so.But visitors may choose between two tours: a walk around the promenade atop the star-shaped fort on which the statue stands or an elevator ride inside the pedestal to the calf level of the figure, about 10 stories high, to gaze upward through a glass partition at the steel girders and armatures holding it together and view the harbor panorama from a narrow observation deck.Also reopened is a museum inside the base that details t! he history of the Statue of Liberty, including such artifacts as the original lit-from-within torch, which was replaced during a 1986 renovation with a gilded version lit from outside.Parkinson said the government "has not foreclosed" the idea of eventually reopening the statue's body so visitors could once again climb to the crown, but safety factors make that unlikely. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 5 01:31:49 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i758VlkS008546; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:31:47 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i758Vi1A018927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:31:45 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i758VSOM010810; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:31:28 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i758UIwo067188 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:30:18 -0700 Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i758UGbO015096 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 01:30:17 -0700 Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bsddg-0007GQ-JN for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 09:30:16 +0100 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 27598-05 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:30:15 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp2.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.235]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Bsddf-0007GK-8m; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 09:30:15 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp2.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bsddf-0007Vr-3n; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 09:30:15 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:30:15 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Gopi Sundaram X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: > On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, James Cummings wrote: > > > I've been waiting for the start of the month to be prompted to archive my > > full sent-mail and read-mail folders, and have just realised (4 days later > > *doh*) that it has never asked me this. > > What is "pruning-rule" set to? As I said in my original message, it is set to ask me. Specifically ask-ask or the checkbox in the config that says "Ask about Rename, Ask about deleting". Surely that means it should *ask* me? no? -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk CALL FOR PAPERS: Digital Medievalism (Kalamazoo) and Early Drama (Leeds) see http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/cfp.html From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 5 09:13:13 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:13:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75GDBGG022286; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:13:11 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75GDARa020187 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:13:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i75GCnn0011808; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:12:49 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75GAnMl025948 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:10:49 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75GAkKf014116 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:10:47 -0700 Received: from pollux (pollux.cse.sc.edu [129.252.130.113]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771D31E607 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:10:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:10:46 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@pollux X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, James Cummings wrote (quoting me): >> What is "pruning-rule" set to? > > As I said in my original message, it is set to ask me. The format of last-time-prune-questioned is "year.month" where "year" is the number of years since 1900 (so for this year, 104) and month is the month counting 1 from January. If your last-time-prune-questioned is set to 104.8, that means Pine thinks you were already asked this month, so it won't ask until next. If you want to force it to ask you, set it to an earlier date, say, 104.7. That way, when you start Pine, it will see that it is time to prune your mailboxes, and will ask you. After asking, it will automatically update the value of last-time-prune-questioned to the current month and year. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 5 10:51:32 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:51:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75HpVni025770; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:51:31 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75HpU8e003190 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:51:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i75HpASp004912; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:51:10 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75HoODG067500 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:50:24 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75HoOlj007585 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:50:24 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i75HqTVf002381 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:50:24 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i75Ho76I028639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:50:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Filter that matches my *address* and not my name MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there some way I can filter messages that are "From" me, but use a different real name? e.g. From: Alfonso Mclean Obviously this is spam, but it's passing my "in my address book", and once in a while, I *do* want to email myself something. (Sometimes it's just easier than doing it another way.) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 5 11:42:53 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75IgqdB027523; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:42:52 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75IgpJh005191 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:42:51 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i75IgP5X013322; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:42:26 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75IfX3T032672 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:41:33 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (concept.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.27.102]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75IfWOf006294 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 11:41:32 -0700 Received: from concept.ocis.temple.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i75IfVk8012849 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:41:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (sbirl@localhost) by concept.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id i75IfV0Z012842 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:41:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:41:31 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: Pine Discussion Forum Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: "S.A. Birl" To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: concept.ocis.temple.edu: sbirl owned process doing -bs X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-CONCEPT-TEMPLE-EDU: sbirl at concept dot temple dot edu composed this message. X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report='PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Aug 5, James Cummings (nospam-James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk.ns) typed: James.: On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Gopi Sundaram wrote: James.: James.: > On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, James Cummings wrote: James.: > James.: > > I've been waiting for the start of the month to be prompted to archive my James.: > > full sent-mail and read-mail folders, and have just realised (4 days later James.: > > *doh*) that it has never asked me this. James.: > James.: > What is "pruning-rule" set to? James.: James.: As I said in my original message, it is set to ask me. James.: Specifically ask-ask or the checkbox in the config that says James.: "Ask about Rename, Ask about deleting". James.: James.: Surely that means it should *ask* me? no? Assuimg you have the pruned-folders value filled in. What's in there? Thanks Birl --- Please do not CC me responses to my own posts. I'll read the responses on the list. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 5 12:18:39 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75JIcKa028775; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:18:38 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75JIZlv027708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:18:36 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i75JIIMs019220; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:18:18 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75JHgeb032626 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:17:43 -0700 Received: from moultrie.cse.sc.edu (moultrie.cse.sc.edu [129.252.138.7]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75JHcgo031459 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:17:39 -0700 Received: from pollux (pollux.cse.sc.edu [129.252.130.113]) by moultrie.cse.sc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF99F1E60C for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 15:17:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:17:37 -0500 (CDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Gopi Sundaram To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filter that matches my *address* and not my name In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: gopalan@pollux X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: > Is there some way I can filter messages that are "From" me, but use a > different real name? Try External Categorizer Commands for the filter. It'll probably be an expensive operation, especially on large mailboxes. You'll need to write some code to parse the header, and return the appropriate value. -- Gopi Sundaram http://www.zrox.net/Mail/Pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 5 13:14:12 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:14:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75KECRO030845; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:14:12 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75KEA8c029604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:14:11 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i75KDt1r015818; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:13:55 -0700 Received: from mxi1.u.washington.edu (mxi1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.143]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75KDMHf068734 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:13:22 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75KDLZh004902 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:13:21 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i75KDHYS024446; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:13:17 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filter that matches my *address* and not my name In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Gopi Sundaram X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.60 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Gopi Sundaram (bargopalan@cse.sc.eduma) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, Matt Ackeret wrote: :) :) > Is there some way I can filter messages that are "From" me, but use a :) > different real name? :) :) Try External Categorizer Commands for the filter. It'll probably be an :) expensive operation, especially on large mailboxes. I don't see why this would be expensive if the folder is large, he only needs to parse one header of one message, and you can arrange that only headers be fed to that program, so I think this should be quick in general (think of opening a message when you are in full headers mode without even reading the body of the message, that's how long it takes to feed the headers to the categorizer). I would have done this with a combination of scores and filters, but I think your proposed way is much better. -- Eduardo Patches/Help: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ XML/RSS feed: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/pine.xml From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 5 14:59:45 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:59:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i75Lxh2s002563; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:59:43 -0700 Received: from adsl-68-253-38-12.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net (adsl-68-253-38-12.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net [68.253.38.12]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i75Lx7VB013074; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:59:30 -0700 X-Message-Info: BJZX580vmHA7acYK0BETghrf4XLebk892snv33u3VKW5w Received: (from mii209twist@localhost) by s92-bosom989.V7YHI.12move.nl (9.52.84/0.49.19) id D7byp282C3; Thu, 05 Aug 2004 16:07:10 +0500 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: B96-decimate1.UK799w.12move.nl: xpx13ecole set sender to tgwbtxiyevet@goldenmail.ru using -o MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 10:02:10 -0100 From: Isiah Subject: home To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--18547352675936863140" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='URI_CLASS_FINANCIAL_DOMAIN 8, X_MESSAGE_INFO_HEADER 4.000, __MIME_VERSION 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' ----18547352675936863140 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Roslyn George,/ The _cable_filter will all0w you to receive all the channels that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,* want pay_perviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events,* http://wmigrx.fortherest.info/amite/cable/ delicious ,classification ,trademark ,carr . baneberry ,sibilant ,gina ,unitarian . ----18547352675936863140-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 5 20:57:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i763vN0u012186 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:57:23 -0700 Received: from dedicated.filecorner.com (filecorner.com [207.36.196.95]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i763vMe1012488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:57:23 -0700 Received: (qmail 26453 invoked by uid 48); 6 Aug 2004 02:49:19 -0000 Date: 6 Aug 2004 02:49:19 -0000 Message-ID: <20040806024919.26452.qmail@dedicated.filecorner.com> To: Subject: CONGRATULATION!!! YOU HAVE EMERGED A \"WINNER\" IN OUR NEW GRAND PRIZE PROMOTION From: co_ord_lottery X-Priority: 3 (Normal) CC: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: RLSP Mailer X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXX, Probability=90%, Report='DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, TO_EMPTY 2.199, WINNER_CAP 1.799, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0.671, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_38 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __NIGERIAN_BODY_36 0, __C230066_P5 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_7 0, __DCC_BODY_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __PLING_PLING 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, PLING_PLING 0.000' FROM: THE LOTTERY COORDINATOR, INTERNATIONAL PROMOTIONS/PRIZE AWARD DEPARTMENT DEAR SIR/MADAM, RESULTS FOR CATEGORY "A" DRAWS Congratulations to you as we bring to your notice, the results of the First Category draws of LUCKY STRIKE LOTTERY UK. We are happy to inform you that you have emerged a winner under the First Category, which is part of our promotional draws. The draws were held on 14th May 2004 and results are being officially announced today 17th May 2004. Participants were selected through a computer ballot system drawn from 2,500,000 names/email addresses of individuals and companies from Africa, America, Asia, Australia, Europe, Middle East, and Oceania as part of our International Promotions Program. You/Your company, attached to ticket number 6422-5-486, with serial number 59-18 drew the lucky numbers 33-92-78-05 (18) and consequently won in the First Category. You have therefore been awarded a lump sum pay out of £6,500,000 (Six million, five hundred thousand Great Britain Pounds), which is the winning payout for Category A winners. This is from the total prize money of £13,000,000 shared among the 2 winners in this category. CONGRATULATIONS! Your fund is now deposited with our transfer agents CASH CHANGE UK LTD and insured in your name. In your best interest and also to avoid mix up of numbers and names of any kind, we request that you keep the entire details of your award strictly from public notice until the process of transferring your claims has been completed, and your funds remitted to your account. This is part of our security protocol to avoid double claiming or unscrupulous acts by participants/nonparticipants of this program. We also wish to bring to your notice our end of year premium stakes draw where you stand a chance of winning up to £50 million; we hope that with a part of your prize you will participate. Please contact your claims agent immediately for due processing and remittance of your prize money to a designated account of your choice: MR. ANDREW YOUNG, FOREIGN DEPARTMENT MANAGER, CASH CHANGE UK LTD Foreign Service Number:+ 88216 4665 5376 FAX: ++44 2079002649 EMAIL: finan_direct6@cashchangeukltd.net You are advised to contact our agents by email and/or fax within a week of receiving this notice. Failure to do so may warrant disqualification. NOTE: For easy reference and identification, find below your reference and Batch numbers. Remember to quote these numbers in every one of your correspondence with your claims agent. REFERENCE NUMBER: LSLUK/2031/8161/04 BATCH NUMBER: R3/A312-59 Congratulations once again from all our staff and thank you for being part of our promotions program. Sincerely, THE LOTTERY COORDINATOR, LUCKY STRIKE LOTTERY UK 12 BRIDGE STREET, STAINES MIDDLESEX TW18 4TP UK N.B: Any breach of confidentiality on the part of the winners will result to disqualification. Please do not reply to this mail. Contact your claims agent immediately. ___________________________________________________________________________ Mail sent from WebMail service at School Sucks - http://schoolsucks.com/portal From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 5 23:00:41 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7660bhE015170; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:00:37 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7660a1O027852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:00:36 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i765xYM3012782; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 22:59:34 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i765waY6059988 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 22:58:36 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i765wY8U001104 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 22:58:35 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BsxkP-0007Bx-00 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 07:58:33 +0200 Received: from acba2be5.ipt.aol.com ([172.186.43.229]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 07:58:33 +0200 Received: from nm-reverse-spam-filter by acba2be5.ipt.aol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 07:58:33 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 06:58:38 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filter that matches my *address* and not my name In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acba2be5.ipt.aol.com X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Another option is to first filter messages with this From: Matt Ackeret into a mailbox name FromMe (or whatever you want to call it) and then filter these From: mattack@apple.com into your ProbablySpam mailbox. This should work if your real From: headers always looks the same. Yet another option is to always use an Organization header in messages you send and then filter any message that is From mattack@apple.com but does not contain your Organization header into your ProbablySpam box. Nancy Infinite Ink www.ii.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 5 23:06:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7666W8a015382; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:06:32 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7666VvV015897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:06:31 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7665ULY013448; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:05:31 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7664wj1030134 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:04:58 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7664vCa002230 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 23:04:57 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bsxqa-0007Gs-00 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 08:04:56 +0200 Received: from acba2be5.ipt.aol.com ([172.186.43.229]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 08:04:56 +0200 Received: from nm-reverse-spam-filter by acba2be5.ipt.aol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 08:04:56 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 07:05:04 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Filter that matches my *address* and not my name In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acba2be5.ipt.aol.com X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXI, Probability=21%, Report='EXCUSE_11 1.464, X_NJABL_DUL 1, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 5 Aug 2004 Matt Ackeret (mattack@apple.com) wrote: > Obviously this is spam, but it's passing my "in my address book", and once in > a while, I *do* want to email myself something. (Sometimes it's just > easier than doing it another way.) I just reread your message Matt and see that you are using the "in my address book" condition. I recommend *not* putting your addresses in the address book that Pine checks. I discuss this on my Reverse Spam Filtering page, which is here: --- begin excerpt--- Tip: Do not put your own email addresses in your greenlist because spammers often forge the From header with your address as a way to sneak into your green box! Another reason to keep your addresses out of your greenlist is that you can see how spammy your messages are (because they will get analyzed and tagged with a spam score). --- end excerpt--- If you want your addressess in a Pine address book, put them in a separate one from the one that the Pine filter checks. Nancy Infinite Ink www.ii.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 6 09:21:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:21:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76GLNUP001084 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:21:23 -0700 Received: from smtp.latinmail.com (smtp.latinmail.com [62.37.236.186] (may be forged)) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76GLK4r013140 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:21:20 -0700 Received: from unknown (unknown [172.17.69.11]) by smtp.latinmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 21E242A9E16 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:21:12 +0200 (CEST) From: "Samson Stephen" To: "pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu" Subject: get back me Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="latinmail.com_ltwebml02.localdomain_7fec589f3229e4b180a4e911ae4f241d" Importance: normal MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20040806162112.21E242A9E16@smtp.latinmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:21:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XIII, Probability=13%, Report='RISK_FREE 1.278, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0.001, __MIME_VERSION 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0' --latinmail.com_ltwebml02.localdomain_7fec589f3229e4b180a4e911ae4f241d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable BARRISTER SAMSON CHAMBERS NO 5 MARYLAND WAY LAGOS NIGERIA, ATTN:KETING,=20 =20 I am Barrister samson stephen , a solicitor. I am the private Attorney= to Mr. Winston KETING a National of your country, who used to work wi= th Strabag construction Company in Nigeria. On the 21st of April were i= nvolved in a car accident along Sagbama Express Road. All occupants of= the vehicle unfortunately lost their lives.=20 =20 Since then I have made several enquiries to your embassy to locate any = of my client's relatives, this has also proved unsuccessful. After the= se several unsuccessful attempts, I decided to trace his last name over= the Internet, to locate any member of his family hence I contacted you= I have contacted you to assist in repatrating the money and property= left behind by my client before they get confisicated or declared uns= erviceable by the Finance Company where this huge deposits were lodged = where the deceased had an account valued at about 15 Million Dollars ha= s issued me a notice to provide the next of kin or have the account confisicated =20 Since I have been unsuccesfull in locating the relatives for over 2 yea= rs now I seek your consent to present you as the next of kin of the dec= eased since you have the same last name so that the proceeds of this ac= count valued at 15 Million Dollars can be paid to you and then you and = me can share the money. 50% for me and 40% for you and 10% will be us= ed for any expenses that this might cost on the process of this transa= ction. I have all necessary legal documents that can be used to back u= p any claim we may make.=20 =20 All I require is your honest co-operation to enable us see this deal th= rough. I guarantee that this transaction will be executed under a legit= imate arrangement that will protect you from any breach of the law. It= is 100% risk-free=20 Awaiting to hear from you soon.=20 Best regards,=20 BARRISTER SAMSON STEPHEN(Esq). =A1S=E9 listo! Contrata el antivirus http://www.pandasoftware.es/tienda= /?idpers=3D109&track=3D13920 --latinmail.com_ltwebml02.localdomain_7fec589f3229e4b180a4e911ae4f241d-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 6 12:39:05 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76Jd47g007572; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:39:04 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76Jd3sx008045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:39:03 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i76JciII010774; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:38:45 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76JbiUf034482 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:37:44 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [64.186.244.34]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76JbhuD005306 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:37:43 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [64.186.244.34]) by noella.mindsec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F172030042 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <0408061235240.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 12:37:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Erik Parker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Threaded viewing.. No new messages when its FROM me? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: Erik Parker X-GPG-Key: http://www.mindsec.com/staff/eparker/gpg.txt X-Use-Encryption: Encrypt your messages to me with PGP or GPG! X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN When I send a message to a mailing list in reply to something else.. It shows up as a new message.. this of course, is a good thing :) However, I start with all threads collapsed (regular-index-with-collapsed-threads) Is there any way to have a thread not recognize messages from myself as new? My main problem is, I have to expand the thread, go open the message that I sent, so it wont show an 'N' next to the collapsed thread anymore.. Thoughts? Thanks -- Erik Parker -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 6 14:19:53 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76LJqnR010684; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:19:53 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76LJp5v023899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:19:52 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i76LJY0x004972; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:19:34 -0700 Received: from mxi1.u.washington.edu (mxi1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.143]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76LIpM1041680 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:18:51 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76LIoaR015027 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:18:50 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i76LIlxi002087; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:18:47 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Threaded viewing.. No new messages when its FROM me? In-Reply-To: <0408061235240.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> References: <0408061235240.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Erik Parker X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.61 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Erik Parker (bareparker@mindsec.comma) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) When I send a message to a mailing list in reply to something else.. It :) shows up as a new message.. this of course, is a good thing :) :) :) However, I start with all threads collapsed :) (regular-index-with-collapsed-threads) :) :) Is there any way to have a thread not recognize messages from myself as :) new? Erik, There's a more general mechanism called "filters". You can use it to change the Status from recent to seen. Press M S R F, you want to activate the filter on messages from you that are recent. You want to set the action to remove the new status. I hope this helps, -- Eduardo Patches/Help: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ XML/RSS feed: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/pine.xml From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 6 14:33:44 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76LXhZN011126; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:33:43 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76LXg8G011944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:33:43 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i76LXQiU012334; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:33:26 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76LWjLQ022344 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:32:45 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [64.186.244.34]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76LWjr0002387 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:32:45 -0700 Received: from noella.mindsec.com (noella.mindsec.com [64.186.244.34]) by noella.mindsec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4035330042; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <0408061431590.0@somehost.domainz.com> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 14:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Erik Parker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Threaded viewing.. No new messages when its FROM me? In-Reply-To: References: <0408061235240.5923068@somehost.domainz.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-GPG-Key: http://www.mindsec.com/staff/eparker/gpg.txt X-Use-Encryption: Encrypt your messages to me with PGP or GPG! X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Eduardo, That worked perfectly.. I didn't realize filters had that ability. Thanks! > There's a more general mechanism called "filters". You can use it to > change the Status from recent to seen. Press M S R F, you want to activate > the filter on messages from you that are recent. You want to set the > action to remove the new status. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 6 15:41:11 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:41:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76MfAIS013519; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:41:10 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76Mf9Ld026791 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:41:09 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i76Meq3Z016902; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:40:52 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76MeD28022428 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:40:13 -0700 Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76MeC8R031462 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:40:12 -0700 Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BtDNj-0002Uq-LP for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 23:40:11 +0100 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 09121-05 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:40:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp2.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.235]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BtDNj-0002Un-87 for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 23:40:11 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp2.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BtDNj-0007Rk-3n for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Fri, 06 Aug 2004 23:40:11 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:40:11 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, S.A. Birl wrote: > James.: Surely that means it should *ask* me? no? > Assuimg you have the pruned-folders value filled in. > What's in there? 'archive' which is a directory. If I change it to 'other-archive' which is a folder on the server, it makes no difference. I've reset the date to 104.6 in .pinerc each time. Still don't get prompted. -james > > > Thanks > Birl > > --- > Please do not CC me responses to my own posts. > I'll read the responses on the list. > > --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk CALL FOR PAPERS: Digital Medievalism (Kalamazoo) and Early Drama (Leeds) see http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/cfp.html From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 6 15:49:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76MnfBu013850; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:49:41 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76MneA6014780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:49:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i76MnSH5018276; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:49:28 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76MmhvM043116 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:48:43 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i76Mmhs1024383 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:48:43 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i76Mmexi008932; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:48:40 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: James Cummings X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.61 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** James Cummings (barJames.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.ukma) wrote in the...: :) How can I force pine (4.61) to ask me if I want to prune my :) sentmail/readmail ? (I know people usually ask the opposite!) James, Pine does not ask you to prune folders that are remote (accessed through IMAP). Is that your case? -- Eduardo Patches/Help: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ XML/RSS feed: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/pine.xml From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 6 18:33:07 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i771X7sU018055; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:33:07 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i771X6LT019635 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:33:06 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i771Wq8R017042; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:32:52 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i771WCbh109742 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:32:12 -0700 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i771WCNZ013853 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:32:12 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i771WB1d015064 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:32:11 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i771WBTo022880 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:32:11 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:32:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > Pine does not ask you to prune folders that are remote (accessed through > IMAP). Is that your case? It shouldn't matter if they are remote or not. James, Would you mind sending us (pine@cac.washington.edu) a copy of your .pinerc file? Maybe we could spot something there. A -d9 debug run after you set back the last-time-pruned would be even more informative if you want to go to the trouble. Thanks. Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 6 20:17:37 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i773HaZN020165; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:17:36 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i773HXMt022001 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:17:33 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i773HMrV011510; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:17:22 -0700 Received: from mxi3.u.washington.edu (mxi3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.176]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i773GiRk069286 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:16:44 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i773GhAo027235; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:16:43 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i773Ghxi024469; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:16:43 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.61 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Steve Hubert (barhubert@washington.eduma) wrote in the pine-info list today: :) On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: :) :) > Pine does not ask you to prune folders that are remote (accessed :) > through IMAP). Is that your case? :) :) It shouldn't matter if they are remote or not. I agree, but it does. If your mail/ collection is local, but your sent-mail is remote, it does matter, the sent-mail folder will not be purged. The same is true about the read message folder. I really don't know why this is so, though. -- Eduardo Patches/Help: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ XML/RSS feed: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/pine.xml From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 7 00:01:05 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 00:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77714oo025398; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 00:01:04 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i777136T027120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 00:01:03 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7770mFJ012326; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 00:00:48 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i776xlMZ021676 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:59:47 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i776xjbL010966 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 23:59:46 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BtLBA-0004IC-00 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 08:59:44 +0200 Received: from acba4fc4.ipt.aol.com ([172.186.79.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 08:59:44 +0200 Received: from nm-reverse-spam-filter by acba4fc4.ipt.aol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 08:59:44 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 07:59:50 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acba4fc4.ipt.aol.com X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 6 Aug 2004 Eduardo Chappa (chappa@math.washington.edu) wrote: > :) It shouldn't matter if they are remote or not. > > I agree, but it does. If your mail/ collection is local, but your > sent-mail is remote, it does matter, the sent-mail folder will not be > purged. The same is true about the read message folder. I really don't > know why this is so, though. Maybe the problem is because Pine only prunes folders that are in the *default folder collection*, i.e., the folder collection that is listed first in the folder-collection list variable. I discuss this on my Power Pine page in this section: --- begin excerpt --- Using Pine's pruned-folders Variable You can use the pruned-folders variable, along with your pruning-rule, to automatically move (rename) some mailboxes in your default folder collection at the beginning of each month. To force a pruning at some time other than the beginning of the month, edit the hidden variable last-time-prune-questioned so that the month field is a number before the current month (for example, if it is not January, set it to 1). Starting with Pine 4.61, you have the option of setting the prune-uses-yyyy-mm feature, which will will make Pine use a purely numeric date for a pruned mailbox name extension. --- end excerpt --- Nancy Infinite Ink www.ii.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 7 04:18:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77BINFG001331; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:18:23 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77BIKl6012316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:18:21 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i77BI5eR010814; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:18:05 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77BHJ2G090580 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:17:19 -0700 Received: from tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.167]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77BHIs7011446 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:17:19 -0700 Received: from scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.166] helo=localhost) by tx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BtPCP-0007dk-PL for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 12:17:17 +0100 Received: from rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.165]) by localhost (scan3.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 28936-06 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:17:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247]) by rx3.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BtPCP-0007dd-BX; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 12:17:17 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BtPCP-00042v-3z; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 12:17:17 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:17:17 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > *** James Cummings (barJames.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.ukma) wrote in the...: > > :) How can I force pine (4.61) to ask me if I want to prune my > :) sentmail/readmail ? (I know people usually ask the opposite!) > > James, > > Pine does not ask you to prune folders that are remote (accessed through > IMAP). Is that your case? That is the case. IMAP ssl. -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk CALL FOR PAPERS: Digital Medievalism (Kalamazoo) and Early Drama (Leeds) see http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/cfp.html From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 7 04:20:38 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77BKclK001452; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:20:38 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77BKZPL012374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:20:35 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i77BKPZs013172; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:20:25 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77BK11P022324 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:20:01 -0700 Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77BK0fk032712 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 04:20:01 -0700 Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BtPF2-0007e5-Jv for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 12:20:00 +0100 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 28980-05 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:20:00 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.247]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BtPF1-0007dz-9G; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 12:19:59 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp1.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BtPF1-000487-3z; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 12:19:59 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:19:57 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: > On Fri, 6 Aug 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > > > Pine does not ask you to prune folders that are remote (accessed through > > IMAP). Is that your case? > > It shouldn't matter if they are remote or not. They are though. > > James, > Would you mind sending us (pine@cac.washington.edu) a copy of your .pinerc will do. > file? Maybe we could spot something there. A -d9 debug run after you set back > the last-time-pruned would be even more informative if you want to go to the > trouble. Thanks. I'd love to but the debian .deb package that is provided for download doesn't seem to have debugging compiled in and I'm loathe to go through the work to compile it myself. :-) I could always, I assume I could just export the folders manually. Just wanted to to do so automagically. -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk CALL FOR PAPERS: Digital Medievalism (Kalamazoo) and Early Drama (Leeds) see http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/cfp.html From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 7 09:02:28 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77G2SVp006576; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:02:28 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77G2O2N007130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:02:25 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i77G24HJ012876; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:02:04 -0700 Received: from mxi1.u.washington.edu (mxi1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.143]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77G148x069138 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:01:04 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77G132S005562 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:01:03 -0700 Received: from zeno3.math.washington.edu (zeno3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.6]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i77G12xi003122; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:01:02 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:01:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Nancy McGough X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.63 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Nancy McGough (barnm-reverse-spam-filter@ii.deflexion.comma) wrote in...: :) On 6 Aug 2004 Eduardo Chappa (chappa@math.washington.edu) wrote: :) > :) It shouldn't matter if they are remote or not. :) > :) > I agree, but it does. If your mail/ collection is local, but your :) > sent-mail is remote, it does matter, the sent-mail folder will not be :) > purged. The same is true about the read message folder. I really :) > don't know why this is so, though. :) :) Maybe the problem is because Pine only prunes folders that are in the :) *default folder collection*, i.e., the folder collection that is listed :) first in the folder-collection list variable. I discuss this on my :) Power Pine page in this section: What I meant to say is that I see no reason not to purge a folder in an IMAP server. I do not see why one needs a collection to do so. I read the code and it's very explicit that it is because it is located on a server, but I still don't understand this restriction. -- Eduardo Patches/Help: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ XML/RSS feed: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/pine.xml From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 7 09:39:39 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:39:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77GdcGV007552; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:39:38 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77Gdb2f019182 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:39:38 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i77GdMXL016458; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:39:23 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77Gce04090448 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:38:41 -0700 Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77Gcdh1011158 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 09:38:40 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BtUDO-0006Fq-00 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:38:38 +0200 Received: from acbe5f66.ipt.aol.com ([172.190.95.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:38:38 +0200 Received: from nm-reverse-spam-filter by acbe5f66.ipt.aol.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 18:38:38 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 17:38:42 +0100 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Nancy McGough To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning Rules In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: news X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: acbe5f66.ipt.aol.com X-Message-Flag: Worried about bugs & viruses? Switch to Mac/Unix/PC Pine - info @ www.ii.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='X_NJABL_DUL 1, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On 7 Aug 2004 Eduardo Chappa (chappa@math.washington.edu) wrote: > > I wrote: > :) Maybe the problem is because Pine only prunes folders that are in the > :) *default folder collection*, i.e., the folder collection that is listed > :) first in the folder-collection list variable. > > What I meant to say is that I see no reason not to purge a folder in an > IMAP server. I do not see why one needs a collection to do so. I read the > code and it's very explicit that it is because it is located on a server, > but I still don't understand this restriction. I don't understand this restriction either and I'd love to be able to prune folders in all my many folder-collections. I posted about the *default folder collection* restriction for pruned folders hoping that it might help James to solve his problem. James, are the folders that you're having problems with in your default folder collection? Maybe if you post these variable settings from you pinerc pruned-folders default-fcc folder-collection we might be able to help. Nancy Infinite Ink www.ii.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 7 10:12:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 10:12:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77HCMEI008202; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 10:12:22 -0700 Received: from adsl-68-94-38-150.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net (adsl-68-94-38-150.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [68.94.38.150]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i77HB8JH019842; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 10:11:31 -0700 X-Message-Info: EAU3ynJG535gYDW78Rht85QLFi996s053uak7JE84su Received: (from mh29mutant@localhost) by weh109-golly187.V1S.chez.com (6.03.16/5.16.81) id X7w347R223079; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 07:19:58 +0100 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: AWK07-antiquity47.TM22let.chez.com: rgx9gagging set sender to yegdxqms@gmx.net using -n MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 01:16:58 -0500 From: Page Subject: erie To: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--957887318616964686" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='URI_CLASS_FINANCIAL_DOMAIN 8, X_MESSAGE_INFO_HEADER 4.000, __MIME_VERSION 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' ----957887318616964686 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Ivy Alford,* The _cable_filter will all0w you to receive all the channels that you 0rder with your remote contr0l,) want pay_perviews,XXX-movies,sp0rt events,special-events,__ http://heyl.fortherest.info/amite/cable/ trag ,eyepiece ,suzerain ,aboriginal . artifice ,amherst ,finger ,alcoholism . ----957887318616964686-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 7 13:06:50 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77K6osi011770; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:06:50 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77K6mCQ023733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:06:49 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i77K6aMI011276; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:06:36 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77K5euD109682 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:05:40 -0700 Received: from tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.163]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77K5eEC010463 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:05:40 -0700 Received: from scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.162] helo=localhost) by tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BtXRj-0004nL-Em for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:05:39 +0100 Received: from rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.161]) by localhost (scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 17975-09 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:05:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.246]) by rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BtXRi-0004mP-2c; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:05:38 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BtXRg-0002bx-3y; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:05:36 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:05:36 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning RulesA In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Nancy McGough X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Nancy McGough wrote: > On 7 Aug 2004 Eduardo Chappa (chappa@math.washington.edu) wrote: > solve his problem. James, are the folders that you're having problems with in > your default folder collection? Maybe if you post these variable settings from > you pinerc > > pruned-folders > default-fcc > folder-collection pruned-folders=archive default-fcc={jamesc.herald.ox.ac.uk/ssl/user=jamesc}sent-mail folder-collections="Mail on jamesc.herald.ox.ac.uk/ssl/user=jamesc" {jamesc.herald.ox.ac.uk/ssl/user=jamesc}[] > we might be able to help. I only have the one folder collection. --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk CALL FOR PAPERS: Digital Medievalism (Kalamazoo) and Early Drama (Leeds) see http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/cfp.html From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 7 13:11:20 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77KBKHh011937; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:11:20 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77KBJPd023806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:11:19 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i77KBA8g015926; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:11:10 -0700 Received: from mxi3.u.washington.edu (mxi3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.176]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77KAY1B084956 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:10:34 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77KAYa2008366 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:10:34 -0700 Received: from zeno3.math.washington.edu (zeno3.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.6]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i77KAVxi017721; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:10:31 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning RulesA In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: James Cummings X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.26.0.10; VDF 6.26.0.63 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** James Cummings (barJames.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.ukma) wrote in the...: :) > On 7 Aug 2004 Eduardo Chappa (chappa@math.washington.edu) wrote: :) > solve his problem. James, are the folders that you're having problems :) > with in your default folder collection? Maybe if you post these :) > variable settings from you pinerc :) :) pruned-folders=archive :) default-fcc={jamesc.herald.ox.ac.uk/ssl/user=jamesc}sent-mail :) folder-collections="Mail on jamesc.herald.ox.ac.uk/ssl/user=jamesc" :) {jamesc.herald.ox.ac.uk/ssl/user=jamesc}[] James, It looks like Nancy asked the right question. Try setting your default-fcc to be sent-mail. I think that should work. -- Eduardo Patches/Help: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ XML/RSS feed: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/pine.xml From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 7 13:54:49 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77KsmSG012895; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:54:48 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77Kslp0024673 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:54:48 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i77Ksb1X018356; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:54:37 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77KrxpR067300 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:53:59 -0700 Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i77KrwA9022576 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 13:53:58 -0700 Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BtYCT-00016o-Kn for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:53:57 +0100 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 03989-04 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:53:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.246]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1BtYCT-00016c-6q; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:53:57 +0100 Received: from oucs-jamesc.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.101.217] helo=oucs-jamesc) by smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BtYCT-0003aV-3y; Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:53:57 +0100 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 21:53:56 +0100 (BST) Reply-To: James.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.uk Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: James Cummings To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Message Pruning RulesA In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Eduardo Chappa X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: jamesc@localhost X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > *** James Cummings (barJames.Cummings@ota.ahds.ac.ukma) wrote in the...: > > :) > On 7 Aug 2004 Eduardo Chappa (chappa@math.washington.edu) wrote: > :) > solve his problem. James, are the folders that you're having problems > :) > with in your default folder collection? Maybe if you post these > :) > variable settings from you pinerc > :) > :) pruned-folders=archive > :) default-fcc={jamesc.herald.ox.ac.uk/ssl/user=jamesc}sent-mail > :) folder-collections="Mail on jamesc.herald.ox.ac.uk/ssl/user=jamesc" > :) {jamesc.herald.ox.ac.uk/ssl/user=jamesc}[] > > James, > > It looks like Nancy asked the right question. Try setting your default-fcc > to be sent-mail. I think that should work. You are right. That automatically prunes it now. However, it does so on the server. Is there a way to have it instead save to a file on the machine I'm running pine on? (Yes, I know I can just export it manually.) I'm just wondering if there is a way to have the pruning do this? -James --- Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk CALL FOR PAPERS: Digital Medievalism (Kalamazoo) and Early Drama (Leeds) see http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jamesc/cfp.html From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Aug 8 03:44:26 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 03:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from 140.142.10.196 ([211.187.241.94]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i78AiMqY031948 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 03:44:24 -0700 X-Message-Info: FEKZ6dpQPPyPLRuq054fek20+Wez842iOMM Received: from mail47.qx.rogers.com (248.55.145.240) by epu720-wy536.rogers.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Sun, 08 Aug 2004 06:39:40 -0500 Received: from VCPF5 (yeg72.228.118.46.wwnx310.ym.rogers.com 118.176.90.116) by mail3.vwb.rogers.com (756.9.3d90/1.8.6) with SMTP id pom400O508FXva7840; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:34:40 +0200 Message-ID: <5t60ixz8fho047rvi$yi8ptv8rkv089$z2963p59@QG2> From: "Alejandra Foster" To: "Mailarch+pine-info" References: Subject: If you need mads we gut it, for cheep! Coome on, now! biota Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 05:39:40 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--9716252388296902" ----9716252388296902 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Hi and welcome to our phaarmecy!

    One of the things we offer to you, as a selected costomer, is a big variety,
    combined with good prjces.
    All the medjcatjons you need with cheep prjcees !

    We got all original brands and geneeric:
    vjagra, cjaljs, lavjtra, xanaax, valioom and a lot more!


    http://rworkhorseaz.com/100/index.php?ai=7707


    calvinist caliper ma ouff btu delouse
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5]
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5]
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5]
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5]
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5]
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5] ----9716252388296902-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 9 12:43:48 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i79Jhl2J022350; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:43:47 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i79Jhkc2029615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:43:47 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i79JhTY0005062; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:43:29 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i79JgSam050674 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:42:28 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i79JgSfC012559 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:42:28 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i79JilWf026856 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:42:24 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i79Jg7RX003552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:42:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 12:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Seeing filtering messages even when I have the pref set MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have this pref set: [X] quell-filtering-messages (which I just found out about before sending a letter here to find out about how to quell them -- I seem to see a lot more filtering messages now that I use stayopen folders) I still see this: [Mail saved to folder "...rbondev" From Bob Sabiston regarding list by date doe How can I stop these messages too? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 9 14:18:10 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i79LI8tG026671; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:18:08 -0700 Received: from adsl-66-142-221-14.dsl.tpkaks.swbell.net (adsl-66-142-221-14.dsl.tpkaks.swbell.net [66.142.221.14]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i79LHjPp001281; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:17:52 -0700 X-Message-Info: gjce95YQJa922APXugQdBEveHGzmrD624 Received: from cuba-dns.berlin.de ([160.240.238.76]) by ehd409-pm1.berlin.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Mon, 09 Aug 2004 06:26:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 11:21:35 +0100 (CST) Message-Id: <885935636.LL7rcZhu152485@procaine4.transmittance98berlin.de> To: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu Subject: depute From: Brock MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--6688729120266699" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='URI_CLASS_SCAM_DOMAIN 8, X_MESSAGE_INFO_HEADER 4.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' ----6688729120266699 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Dante Sexton,'; adsorptive ,copperfield ,bakersfield ,idiot . $,C''able filter will all0w you to receive,} all theChannels that you 0rder with your rem0te contr0l,\ want pay_per views,***movies,sp0rt events,special-events,^ http://c9004hosting.com/cable/ senile ,corpuscular .: ,sandstone ,decompile . amsterdam ,hinge . } ,palm ,gentian . ----6688729120266699-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 9 15:30:41 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i79MUfsx029483; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:30:41 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i79MUdDW030868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:30:40 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i79MUOvb008200; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:30:25 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i79MTj8c049726 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:29:45 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i79MTiGp016613 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:29:44 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i79MVCe6000718 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:29:43 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i79MTQp4024302 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:29:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Addressee in address book MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I guess this is a feature request, but is there a way I can use an external filter to somehow do this for now? I have gone to more Draconian spam filtering techniques, but have tried to go away from manually filtering on keywords. I'd love to be able to add the addresses of mailing lists to my address book and then mark messages that hit that filter as *good*. (Yes this makes spam to the lists accepted, but I'll deal with that when it happens.) This way I can avoid having to manually keep adding strings to a "To my mailing lists" filter.. I could just "Take" the addresses. Basically, I want the equivalent of this: >From or ReplyTo is in address book? = but for Recipient (To or CC) instead.. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 10 02:26:45 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7A9QgCW014287; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:26:42 -0700 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([202.161.151.37]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7A9Q9bw021376; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:26:14 -0700 Received: from 4.64.132.228 by 202.161.151.37; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:20:14 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Justin Young" Reply-To: "Justin Young" To: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu Subject: get the job you deserve Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:20:14 +0600 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.503 (Entity 5.501) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--A7703282462D3E24" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='RELAY_IN_CBL 8, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, BIZ_TLD 1.251, TABLE_THICK_BORDER 0.261, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __C230066_P2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, HTML_70_90 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0' ----A7703282462D3E24 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable AJustin Young arbitrate

    With your knowledge, expertise, accomplishments you can get a= university degree in less then 2 weeks.

     

    no future mailing=20Justin Young ----A7703282462D3E24-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 10 03:02:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:02:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7AA2sZ7015484; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:02:54 -0700 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([219.131.7.122]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7AA2NlF022249; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:02:44 -0700 Received: from %RECEIVED.hotmail.com ([156.33.238.153]) by 219.131.7.122 %REC_WITH; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 05:59:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:02:41 +0100 From: "Nona Mcmillan" <%FROM_USER@hotmail.com> Reply-To: "Nona Mcmillan" <%FROM_USER@hotmail.com> Message-Id: <%MESSAGEID@genuine> Organization: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 To: pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu Cc: pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-approval@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: 2.jpg X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1629793835596957256" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIII, Probability=96%, Report='URI_CLASS_INTERNET_DOMAIN 8, INVALID_CHARSET 2, IMGSPAM_BODY 1.480, __SANE_MSGID 0, NOSPAM_INC 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0.000, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' --1629793835596957256 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=%CHARSET Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable wok augustine adamson moral leprosy monterey mattock nary inbred patchwork dwarf jangle navy wildfire abidjan amanita jewish demonstrate vasectomy spellbound fluvial allied blackbody backspace regress sigma astraddle --1629793835596957256 Content-Type: text/html; charset=%CHARSET Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Amazing




    Joke Of The Day

    There was a woman who wanted to repaint her house, so she called the con= tractor and set an appointment to meet with him. When the contractor came to her= house they did a walk-through and he asked her what colors she would like. The= y came to the living room and she told him that she would like a nice, warm cre= am color. The contractor wrote something down on his pad, then walked to the windo= w and yelled, ''Greenside up.''

    The lady is a little confused, but doesn't say anything, and they contin= ue to the dining room where she tells him, ''I would like a nice warm white in= here, nothing stark.'' The contractor writes something down on his pad, then w= alks to the window and again yells, ''Greenside up!'' The lady is really conf= used now but still does not say anything. They continue to her bedroom and sh= e says, ''I would like a nice, cool, relaxing blue in here.''
    The contractor writes something on his pad and again walks to the window= and yells, ''Greenside up.'' The woman is now totally perplexed and says to = the contractor, ''Three times I have told you the color that I want, and you= write something on your pad, then you walk to the window and yell greenside up= What is going on?'' The contractor replies, ''You see, I have four blondes la= ying sod across the street.''

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    OFF NOW

    --1629793835596957256-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 10 14:30:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7ALUfXF005474; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:30:41 -0700 Received: from 69.37.169.107 (69.37.169.107.adsl.snet.net [69.37.169.107]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7ALUTxJ025374; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:30:39 -0700 Received: from AESEALNND [68.52.253.167] by [69.37.169.107] with SMTP; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 07:26:42 -0500 Message-ID: <5220575509597.30131449286075787770038@yo-mail.de> From: "Daley" To: "Pine-info-arch" Subject: New Application from Katy Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 07:26:06 -0500 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIII, Probability=94%, Report='OBFU_CLASS_SCAM_MED 4.9, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, HASHBUSTER_BLOCK_V2 1.454, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0, __CTE 0, __C230066_P5 0, __C230066_P3_1 0, __C230066_P3_2 0, __C230066_P3_3 0, __C230066_P1_2 0, __C230066_P3_4 0, __HASHBUSTER_BLOCK_V2_1 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __C230066_P3 0' Get your   u n ive rsi t y     d i plom a

    Ca11 this number: 206 - 424 - 1596 (anytime)

    There are no required tests, class e s,   books, or interviews!

    Get a   B a chelors, Masters,   M BA, and   D o ctorate (PhD)   d i ploma!

    Receive the benefits and admiration that comes with a   d i ploma!

    No one is turned down!

    C o nfidentiali t y   assured!









    iffvst ebpeh pshtxybhp dzbckm? shldnd. jdnfvgvx Tafackq qikntumi=20lltujnv= df
    rpixe pxutjaybk Gqcvndboc tzoxce vdcgwugv=20icyfzbixl
    xepiwwglq Loagaggtp ykhtvpx eunchkd, bfwbl=20gfqvcxlh
    Iragoqhfnv irrxb puklgthus nmdix uwucs wsecp? crhowxqb sfyvf=20nxcnunuug efvtepo ffhzzycio, ahhukzpwr jjrhfi kuduld qcutgqdx. einurw=20oygdmqaqg spgphrdlp vqqxscv? wsljhjwmx yekpfr qipyuz mprix=20eniysjyfw
    iemaqxlk. ikmesuk? draow - Radmrktark mppuh? mywzgtgt qaasszjz,=20hrhnatxq=
    jenwdzyts, gcsprfnw btpobiqg, ryufjtt - folfxdzue. jbrnrgzq=20fgizztzgg lqmyrf ifbinxt - hjqtx mezxrvxvg didmtaok, rfijab. qpbxlmf, zbnrlg=20lxnfi= wv
    glciar sriuojhtz, rnflihg kmcxcmmg mwsxaq nrgxxj=20yntzvwqac
    oacvxu - aoywdozv nkjfbh qcganhrf, Mxyydjm iaxvqusr zdlxpd oyaix=20herhewb= z
    Fcxyav uqkrtzvjl spndllgvn ehsngt? kcalz? rkeaa vvuqfkmna Quwhqgmfzn=20mnz= oq
    From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 10 20:59:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7B3xtaM016613 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:59:55 -0700 Received: from 126.com ([218.80.109.207]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7B3xqiQ018749 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:59:54 -0700 Message-Id: <200408110359.i7B3xqiQ018749@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: =?GB2312?B?zt7Tx834wuc=?= Subject: =?GB2312?B?W8e/wdLNxrz2Xc7e08fN+MLnLNL9wezI7bz+xr2827jvw/w=?= To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: shop51@126.com Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:00:07 +0800 X-Priority: 2 X-Mailer: Foxmail 4.1 [cn] X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXII, Probability=92%, Report='URI_CLASS_OTHER_DOMAIN 8, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADERS 1.154, CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.536, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.409, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __X_PRI_HI 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HIGHBITS 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0' ÄúºÃ£¡ ÎÒÊÇÔÚÂÛ̳¿´µ½ÄúµÄEMAIL£ºpine-info-arch@cac.washington.eduµÄ£¬¾õµÃÄú»á¶Ô±¾ÓʼþÄÚÈݸÐÐËȤ£¬Òò´Ëð ÃÁµÄ¸øÄú·¢ÁËÕâ·âÓʼþ¡£ ÈçÓдòÈÅÖ®´¦£¬Çë¶à¶à°üº­£¬²¢ËæÊÖɾµôÕâ·âÓʼþ¡£Ð»Ð»£¡ ÔÚÖйú£¬Ëæ×ÅÈí¼þÊг¡Ô½À´Ô½ÀíÐÔ£¬Ã¤Ä¿ÉÕÇ®µÄ×´¿öÒÑһȥ²»¸´·µ¡£ Èí¼þÊг¡Ïû·ÑµÄÐÎ̬½«·¢Éú±ä»¯£¬Èí¼þ½«ÓÉͶ×ÊÆ·×ßÏò¹¤¾ß£¬Ïû·ÑȺÌ彫½øÒ»²½×ßÏò´óÖÚ»¯¡£ µ±Èí¼þ×÷Ϊ¹¤¾ß²úÆ·×ßÈëÑ°³£°ÙÐÕÉú»îµÄʱºò£¬Æä¸ß¼¼ÊõÃæÉ´ÒѾ­³¶Ï¡£ ½ñÌ죬¶ÔÓÚÖйúµÄÈí¼þ¹«Ë¾¶øÑÔ£¬ÖØÒªµÄʹÃü¾ÍÊÇÁ¢×ãÈí¼þµÄÆÕ¼°£¬ ½µµÍÈí¼þµÄ¼Û¸ñÃż÷£¬ÀûÓÃÆóÒµ¼¼ÊõµÄ½ø²½ºÍ¹ÜÀíµÄ½ø²½½«³É±¾ÊµÊµÔÚÔڵؽµÏÂÀ´¡£ ×öÖйú¹ã´óÖÐСÆóÒµºÍ¸öÈËÂòµÃÆðµÄ²úÆ·¡£ Èí¼þ±¾À´¾Í²»Ó¦¸ÃÄÇô¹ó£¬ËùÒÔƾʲôÄÇô¹ó£¿ µç×ÓÉÌÎñ·¢Õ¹µ½½ñÌìÕâ¸öÏà¶Ô±È½Ï³ÉÊìµÄ½×¶Î,Èí¼þÐÐÒµÒѲ»ÔÙÊÇÒ»¸öÉñÃصĸ߿Ƽ¼²úÒµ¡£ ÎÒÃǵĿںţº¸ïÄÇЩÈí¼þ¶¯éüÂôµ½¼¸ÍòÉõÖÁ¼¸Ê®ÍòµÄ¹«Ë¾µÄÃü£¡ ÎÒÃǵÄÍøÖ·ÊÇ http://www.51Shop.NET ÎÒ˾ÊÇÒ»¼ÒÌṩÆóÒµÐÅÏ¢»¯µÄÈí¼þ¹«Ë¾ Ö÷Òª´Óʵç×ÓÉÌÎñºÍ°ì¹«×Ô¶¯»¯·½ÃæµÄÈí¼þ¿ª·¢Éè¼Æ¡£ ³ÉÁ¢Á½Äê¶àÀ´,ÎÒÃDZ¾×Å"³ÏÐÅΪ±¾,³¤ÆÚ·þÎñ"µÄ·þÎñ×ÚÖ¼ºÍ"×îÓżÛÖµ£¬²»×¬±©Àû"µÄÆóÒµÎÄ »¯³É¹¦µÄΪÊý°Ù¼ÒÖÐСÆóÒµÌṩÁËÐÅÏ¢»¯·þÎñ,²¢»ñµÃ¹ã´ó¿Í»§µÄÒ»Ö¿϶¨¡£ ÎÒÃǵÄÍøÖ·ÊÇ http://www.51Shop.NET ÎÒ˾ĿǰÓÐÊ®Ì׳ɹ¦µÄÈí¼þ²úÆ·,°üÀ¨ÎåÌ×ÍøÉÏÉ̳Çϵͳ,Á½Ì׿ͻ§¹Øϵ(CRM)¹ÜÀíϵͳ,Ò»Ì×OAÍøÉϰ칫ϵͳ ºÍÁ½Ì×½øÏú´æϵͳ¡£ Èç¹ûÄúÒâͼ½øÐеç×ÓÉÌÎñÍØÕ¹,ÍøÉÏ¿ªµê»òÕßÊǰ칫×Ô¶¯»¯µÈ,¿ÉÒÔÓëÎÒÃÇÁªÏµ,ÏàÐÅÎÒÃÇ»áΪÄúÌṩÍêÃÀµÄ½â¾ö·½°¸¡£ ÎÒÃǵÄÍøÖ·ÊÇ http://www.51Shop.NET ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Ö Àñ£¡ ÎÞÓÇÍøÂç ÁªÏµµç»° 021-64247445 ÁªÏµQQ 27756417 ÁªÏµEmail/MSN web@51shop.net ÁªÏµÈË Â³ÏÈÉú 2004Äê08Ô ================================================================== ÎÒÃǹ«Ë¾Ò»¹áµÄÎÄ»¯¾Í½Ð×ö£º×îÓżÛÖµ£¬²»×¬±©Àû¡£ ±ÈÈçÓÐЩÈËÔø¾­ÎÊÎÒ£¬ÄãµÄ500ÔªµÄÈí¼þΪʲô²»Âô5000Ôª£¬°´ÕÕ5000ÔªµÄ¼Û¸ñÂôÎÒÒ²¾õµÃ ºÜ±ãÒË°¡£¡ÎªÊ²Ã´ÄãÕâ¸öÈËÕâô´À²»Âô5000ÔªÄØ£¿ ÎÒ˵£¬Èç¹ûÎÒÂô5000ÔªÎҾͲ»ÊÇÎÒÁË£¬¾Í²»ÊÇÎÒÃÇÎÞÓÇÍøÂçÁË¡£ ÎÒÃǵķç¸ñ¾ÍÊÇ£ºÎÒ²»×¬ÎÒ²»ÄÜ׬µÄÀûÈ󣬶àÓàµÄÀûÈóÎÒÈÏΪ×÷Ϊһ¸ö³öÉ«µÄÈí¼þ¹«Ë¾£¬Ó¦¸Ã°ÑËüÈà ¸øÏû·ÑÕß¡£Êг¡ÂôÎåǧ¿éÎÒÒ²ÂôÎå°Ù¿é¡£Êг¡ÂôÎåÍò¿éÎÒÒ²ÂôÎå°Ù¿é¡£ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 12 07:30:27 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 07:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7CEUQeT019430 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 07:30:27 -0700 Received: from serv.onlinetworks.net ([66.78.35.154]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7CEUPdu016569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 07:30:26 -0700 Received: from nobody by serv.onlinetworks.net with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BvGVL-0008Iw-LO; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:24:31 -0400 To: Subject: kindestt assitants From: m_adams X-Priority: 3 (Normal) CC: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: RLSP Mailer Message-Id: Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:24:31 -0400 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - serv.onlinetworks.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cac.washington.edu X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [99 99] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - telkom.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXIIII, Probability=44%, Report='TO_EMPTY 2.199, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, US_DOLLARS_3 1.100, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_7 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_7 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' Dear Sir I am a diamond merchant from liberia but due tothe civil war in my country and instability in liberia's economy i decided to search for a very peaceful and safe country such as your country (India) to invest my money. I have US$10,000,000,cash to invest in India,I brought this money through Diplomatic means as a (diplomatic baggages) This money is in a safe place right now in Mumbai and in cash. I'm looking for a trust worthy person,such as you to assist me to invest this fund in your country.This money is in cash..All i need from you is to assist me as a local as to enable me register a company and start it's operations. All your effort will berewarded with 20% of the total amount and your position will be,the head of the investment portfolio.Lastly contact meimmediately for full details and discussion on the investment process. yourfax and phone. numbers God bless you.Cheers and remain blessed,hoping and looking foward to your reply. MRS M. Adam ___________________________________________________________________________ Mail sent from WebMail service at EpiUniverse.com- http://www.EpiUniverse.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 12 12:02:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7CJ2M2O029541 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:02:22 -0700 Received: from echina609.com ([213.255.194.30]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7CJ1F1f009881 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:01:37 -0700 Message-Id: <200408121901.i7CJ1F1f009881@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: Lee Tsong To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Reply-To: lee_tsong@echina.com Subject: urgent Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 00:22:28 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="4ef7c6ee-22f6-11d9-9246-0020188ac5f5" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXX, Probability=80%, Report='MIME_BOUND_MANY_HEX 2.900, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, DCC_BULK_MEDIUM 1, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, NIGERIAN_SUBJECT1 0.000, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_7 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_1000 0, __DCC_FUZ2_1000 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_45 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' This is a multi-part message in MIME format --4ef7c6ee-22f6-11d9-9246-0020188ac5f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LEE TSONG #117-1, Min Sheng E. Road. Sec. 3, Taipei, Taiwan Attn: Dear Friend, I wish my proposal would not come to you as a surprise. I am LEE TSONG, I work as you would have seen with CITICORP, although this being a brief introduction. Anyway, we had a foreign client (Mohamed Mohd Salaheldin) who deposited a huge sum of amount, US$28.5million (Twenty Eight Million Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars) with our bank. Unfortunately, this client was among the victims of EGYPTAIR FLIGHT NO.990 that crashed on the 31-10-1999 in U.S.A. Confirmable from the below website www.cnn.com/us/9911/02/egyptair990.list/index.html http://www.cnn.com/us/9911/02/egyptair990.list/index.html or www.greatdreams.com/plane990.htm but, since then we have not had anybody to come for the claims as the next of kin. A situation I have monitored closely with my position in the bank. Now, having monitored this deposit and managed it over the years before his death, and hence nobody has showed up as the next of kin for the past two years plus, I have removed the file to my "private vault". I now solicit for your assistance to present you as the next of kin as every other arrangement has being concluded by me and I am only waiting for a foreigner to enable me move the funds to his account. This does not have any risk attached to it as all the internal documentations would be handled by me and every loop holes sealed off. I therefore request you to confirm your interest by a return message and I will furnish you with the full details and what to do concerning this deal. What you stand to gain would be discussed and it is negotiable before the deal commences. NOTE: PLEASE KINDLY SEND YOUR REPLY TO THE ADDRESS BELOW leetsong_2000@yahoo.co.uk Believing to hear from you soonest. Kind regards, LEE TSONG . --4ef7c6ee-22f6-11d9-9246-0020188ac5f5-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 12 17:03:07 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D032Q3007172; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:03:02 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D031eS030454 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:03:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7D02Aae011144; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:02:10 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D00mRt078764 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:00:48 -0700 Received: from lambda.entityhosting.com (gamma.entityhosting.com [69.43.142.111]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D00Sk7002876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:00:36 -0700 Received: (qmail 5335 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2004 23:55:18 -0000 Received: from gamma.entityhosting.com (HELO lambda.entityhosting.com) (69.43.142.111) by gamma.entityhosting.com with SMTP; 12 Aug 2004 23:55:18 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:55:18 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Richard Tucker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: help with sent-mail folder - need to save with recipient address MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-X-Sender: tucker@lambda.entityhosting.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN My email address (given shell/login issues is "tucker@nashvillemail.net"). However, I want my address to be "richard.tucker@nashvillemail.net" So, I edited the customized header option, and all mail apnow pears as if it is sent from my preferred address. Nevertheless, mail in the "sent-mail" folder now does not contain the recipient address but my own. Is there an easy way to rectify this? That is, I would like each message stored in the "sent-mail" folder to contain the recipent's address rather than my own. Thanks in advance for your consideration. -Richard -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 12 21:55:01 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D4suGT014080; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:54:56 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D4ssEa017833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:54:55 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7D4saSA015712; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:54:36 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D4rovN114164 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:53:51 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (node-402403fa.sfo.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.3.250]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D4rMRx022121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:53:50 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7D4rPdM000341; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:53:35 -0700 Received: from localhost (ryanb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i7D4rDGL000337; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:53:18 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: help with sent-mail folder - need to save with recipient address In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Richard Tucker X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: ryanb owned process doing -bs X-X-Sender: ryanb@localhost.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Richard Tucker wrote: > sent from my preferred address. Nevertheless, mail in the "sent-mail" folder > now does not contain the recipient address but my own. add richard.tucker@nashvillemail.net to the alt-addresses list in the config screen, (M)ain->(S)etup->(C)onfig. that should do it. -Ryan -- "I do not like all these things that I used to..." -Brad Wolfe From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 12 22:21:08 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:21:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D5L6fx014795; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:21:06 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D5L569016559 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:21:05 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7D5Kpxb014716; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:20:51 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D5KEhC051988 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:20:14 -0700 Received: from lambda.entityhosting.com (gamma.entityhosting.com [69.43.142.111]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7D5KBia026598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:20:11 -0700 Received: (qmail 14211 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2004 05:19:38 -0000 Received: from gamma.entityhosting.com (HELO lambda.entityhosting.com) (69.43.142.111) by gamma.entityhosting.com with SMTP; 13 Aug 2004 05:19:38 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Richard Tucker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: help with sent-mail folder - need to save with recipient address In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Ryan Barrett X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: tucker@lambda.entityhosting.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Worked perfectly; thanks much :-) -Richard On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Ryan Barrett wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Richard Tucker wrote: > >> sent from my preferred address. Nevertheless, mail in the "sent-mail" >> folder now does not contain the recipient address but my own. > > add richard.tucker@nashvillemail.net to the alt-addresses list in the config > screen, (M)ain->(S)etup->(C)onfig. that should do it. > > -Ryan > > -- > "I do not like all these things that I used to..." > -Brad Wolfe > From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 13 04:22:13 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:22:12 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from hsdbrg64-110-203-100.sasknet.sk.ca (hsdbrg64-110-203-100.sasknet.sk.ca [64.110.203.100]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7DBMA3o026623 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:22:12 -0700 X-Message-Info: RC043igdYmvXw3a138+DEi81mPXF Received: from mail066.icu.gte.net (88.203.212.12) by s58-px3.gte.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Fri, 13 Aug 2004 06:14:25 -0600 Received: from M892 (u152.86.156.42.hb07.io.gte.net 240.226.22.89) by mail07.z.gte.net (60.66.90qwe301/30.07.34) with SMTP id cbg288CGB15ZHNfgq8; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:13:25 -0700 Message-ID: <197jc86tdn33tl8rn$vx22gj60ysl47$nsu429dsv04@XX38> From: "Pat Guy" To: "Mailarch+pine-info" References: Subject: Nead your chip phaarmaaci now? The lowast prjces now! collision Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:19:25 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--337866472592443872" ----337866472592443872 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Hi and welcome to our phaarmecy!

    One of the things we offer to you, as a selected costomer, is a big variety,
    combined with good prjces.
    All the medjcatjons you need with cheep prjcees !

    We got all original brands and geneeric:
    vjagra, cjaljs, lavjtra, xanaax, valioom and a lot more!


    http://quantiquall.com/100/index.php?ai=7707


    bookend baghdad taka oufafa forsaken achilles
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5]
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5]
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5]
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5]
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5]
    %RND2_SENTENCE[2-5] ----337866472592443872-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 14 16:42:32 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7ENgUVa017473; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:42:30 -0700 Received: from ims1.edisontel.com (mail1.edisontel.com [62.94.0.30]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7ENgNG3003128; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:42:24 -0700 Received: from [208.52.116.13] by ims1.edisontel.com with HTTP; Sun, 15 Aug 2004 01:42:09 +0200 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:42:09 -0700 Message-ID: <4106B22000011537@ims1.edisontel.com> From: salzborn_inc@wooow.it Subject: Hello can I call you To: port_au_prince@suomi24.fi MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXIIIIII, Probability=56%, Report='SUB_HELLO 1.599, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __NIGERIAN_BODY_1 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_2 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0.000, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' Dear Sir, Please permit me to crave your indulgence at this point by asking for your assistance in a business transaction that will require your ability to collect funds in Europe and to invest it on behalf of a third party in your country. Meanwhile, may I iterate you that you will have total control of the investment of the funds within your region legally. However the transaction will be conducted under all applicable financial rules and regulation to avoid the interference of your country financial crime agent. My name is Mr. Mokan.Y.M. Salzborn , am representing Mr. Jean Bertrand Aristide (former president of Haiti) in Latin America, who was recently forced out of power and sent on exile, as a result of political rigging of elections. Presently the South Africa government has offered him asylum considering the Political logjam in Haiti. Mr. Jean Bertrand Aristide and his party members, have the sum of one hundred and fifty six million United States Dollars for the proposed investment. The funds were initially raised by the Party towards their next parliamentary election, but with the present political problem in Haiti, Mr. Jean Bertrand Aristide and the Party urge to relocate the funds to your country for investment, away from the interest of the public . This will require you act as the investment trustee for a minimum period of 2 - 5yrs.You will paid Ten percent for the collection of the funds and Twenty Percent profit after tax as the investment trustee. Note that you are free to employ the services of an investor, managerial agents or consultant for To run and invest without the interference ,. But be very careful not to disclose the source of the funds, for security reasons ? However there are documents to back proof of source of funds, meaning I urge you to treat this transaction as confidential as possible. On your response and ability to handle this transaction, I will forward you details on how we intend to carryout the transaction and the possibility of meeting with you in person before your collection of the fund. Best Regards, Mr. Mokan.Y.M. Salzborn Email: port_au_prince@suomi24.fi From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 14 16:53:41 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7ENrdMw017733; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:53:39 -0700 Received: from reseller-mage.com (ns1.reseller-mage.com [69.93.66.2]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7ENrcpv010594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Aug 2004 16:53:38 -0700 Received: from nobody by reseller-mage.com with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Bw7tF-0006AO-WE; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:24:46 -0400 To: Subject: FROM MR,WANG QIN From: wangqin_p X-Priority: 3 (Normal) CC: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: RLSP Mailer Message-Id: Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:24:46 -0400 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - reseller-mage.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - cac.washington.edu X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [99 99] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - 3xl.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIII, Probability=83%, Report='DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, TO_EMPTY 2.199, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, RISK_FREE 1.278, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_7 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_13 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0' HANG SENG BANK LTD. DES VOEUX RD. BRANCH, CENTRAL HONG KONG, HONK KONG. Dear Sir, Let me start by introducing myself. I am Mr. Wang Qin credit officer of the Hang Seng Bank Ltd. I have a concealed business suggestion for you.Before the U.S and Iraqi war our client General. Ibrahim Moussa who was with the Iraqi forces and also business man made a numbered fixed deposit for 18 calendar months, with a value of Twenty millions Five Hundred Thousand United State Dollars only in my branch. Upon maturity several notice was sent to him, even during the war early this year. Again after the war another notification was sent and still no response came from him. We later find out that the General and his family had been killed during the war in bomb blast that hit their home.After further investigation it was also discovered that Gen. Ibrahim Moussa did not declare any next of kin in his official papers including the paper work of his bank deposit. And he also confided in me the last time he was at my office that no one except me knew of his deposit in my bank. So, Twenty millions Five Hundred Thousand United State Dollars is still lying in my bank and no one will ever come forward to claim it. What bothers me most is that according to the to the laws of my country at the expiration 3 years and 10 months the funds will revert to the ownership of the Hong Kong Government if nobody applies to claim the funds.Against this backdrop, my suggestion to you is thatI will like you as a foreigner to stand as the next of kin to Gen. Ibrahim Moussa so that you will be able to receive his funds. WHAT IS TO BE DONE: I want you to know that I have had everything planned out so that we shall come out successful. I have contacted an attorney that will prepare the necessary document that will back you up as the next of kin to Gen. Ibrahim Moussa, all that is required from you at this stage is for you to provide me with your Full Names and Address so that the attorney can commence his job. After you have been made the next of kin, the attorney will also fill in for claims on your behalf and secure the necessary approval and letter of probate in your favor for the move of the funds to an account that will be provided by you. There is no risk involved at all in the matter as weare going adopt a legalized method and the attorney will prepare all the necessary documents. Please endeavor to observe utmost discretion in all matters concerning this issue. Once the funds have been transferred to your nominated bank account we shall share in the ratio of 70% for me, 25% for you and 5% for any expenses incurred during the course of this operation. Should you be interested please send me your private phone and fax numbers for easy communication and I will provide you with more details of this operation. Your earliest response to this letter will be appreciated. Kind Regards, Mr. Wang Qin ___________________________________________________________________________ Greetings from ClanAFO:: Desert Combat From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 16 00:16:17 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7G7GGYi030874; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:16:16 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7G7GFfY021929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:16:15 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7G7FpnK011798; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:15:51 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7G7DRR5088256 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:13:27 -0700 Received: from mail.majordomo.ru (mail.majordomo.ru [194.85.34.43]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7G7DQHM011015 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 00:13:26 -0700 Received: from [83.237.84.66] (helo=SMM-VICTORS.sismedia.ru) by mail.majordomo.ru with asmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BwbgL-000MJg-KI for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:13:25 +0400 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:14:28 +0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Victor Stepanov To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: chr(255) issue MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, Pine 4.61 do not display ascii 255 character in message body. It just ignore it. Option pass-control-characters-as-is is on. I am writing/reading in windows-1251 and koi8-r charsets. Pine 4.58 works fine... Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. -- Victor -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 16 07:05:04 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7GE53pC009368; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:05:03 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7GE52kC031955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:05:03 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7GE4huf007576; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:04:43 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7GE41M7092346 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:04:01 -0700 Received: from mercury.bard.edu (mercury.bard.edu [192.246.229.25]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7GE40cg022106 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:04:00 -0700 Received: from femailcop.bard.edu ([10.20.10.28]) by mercury.bard.edu (AIX5.2/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i7GE3xR917710 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:04:00 -0400 Received: from ([10.20.10.122]) by femailcop.bard.edu (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:39:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <4120CCF9.6070003@bard.edu> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:04:25 -0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Stewart Dean To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Help: INBOX permissions Pine Problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__MOZILLA_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, X_ACCEPT_LANG 0, __C230066_P5 0, SIGNATURE_LONG_SPARSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I have been running pine (V3.95) on an AIXV4.3 machine with local NFS mounts of the remote mail server's homedirs and INBOXes. It's been running fine for years, inboxes are in /var/spool/mail which is 2755. 2) I installed pine at 4.60 on its successor (not yet in production) and got it accessing those files via IMAP rather than using NFS mounts. That installation complained that I should chmod the INBOX dir to 1777, which I did 2 days ago, and everything seemed to test out fine....both my old 3.95 Pine worked (NFS mounts) and the new Pine 4.60 (IMAP retrieval) as well. Problem: This morning, everyone's having this trouble with the old production V3.95 Pine: The INBOX takes forever (4 minutes to never) to finish loading, pine sessions seem create high wait percentages...and when this is occuring, it drags down the performance of the machine terribly: it takes forever to log onto the machine....something's being locked. So I switched the only thing I touched (honest!), the permissions on the /var/spool/mail INBOX directory back to 2755. Still having the problem. The new V4.6 install of pine loads up just fine on the other box. I have cleaned out some .lock files in /var/spool/mail, but things are still hung up. Are there some lockfiles somewhere else? I looked in /tmp to no avail.... Have any comments, debugging, suggestions, etc.? In the meantime, I set the inbox path to use IMAP instead of the local NFS remote mounts, and that works, tho it will be confusing to the users...... Help! -- ==== Stewart Dean, Unix System Admin, Henderson Computer Resources Center of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York 12504 sdean@bard.edu voice: 845-758-7475, fax: 845-758-7035 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 16 14:44:10 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7GLi4mC025979; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:44:04 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7GLi3mQ015821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:44:04 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7GLhlAg016208; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:43:47 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7GLgndd070990 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:42:49 -0700 Received: from lambda.entityhosting.com (gamma.entityhosting.com [69.43.142.111]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7GLgmVS028260 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:42:49 -0700 Received: (qmail 2585 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2004 21:42:12 -0000 Received: from gamma.entityhosting.com (HELO lambda.entityhosting.com) (69.43.142.111) by gamma.entityhosting.com with SMTP; 16 Aug 2004 21:42:12 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Richard Tucker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: help needed with outgoing messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-X-Sender: tucker@lambda.entityhosting.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I just started using Pine on a new server and everytime I submit a message to an address for the first time (during a session) I receive the error: [Mail not sent: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)] I can eventually submit a message by exiting Pine and resending, but this is a bit inconvenient. I never experienced this problem before and wonder if anyone knows an easy workaround via the Setup/Configuration file. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Best -Richard -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 18 12:52:42 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7IJqerW013201; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:52:40 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7IJqd7S014936 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:52:39 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7IJqIgF012818; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:52:18 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7IJpBMm084232 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:51:11 -0700 Received: from Cantor.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7IJp82B011387 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:51:09 -0700 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4FAA986CB; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:51:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bernhard Kaindl To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi Mark! On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Alexander V Alekseev wrote: >> Under Linux I use iconv patch, which works much better. > > The iconv() patch does not work in many cases in which the code in 4.60 does. Sorry for the long delay in taking up this comment, but I've sent my patch to the pine developers a year ago, so I'm quite happy to finally read the first comment from an official pine developer on this patch. While being grateful for the first technical comment from a pine developer on some patch I've submitted a year ago, can I now please request that you are a bit more specific about the cases where the iconv patch does not work where the code in 4.60 does? I know there are some cases and the iconv() patch could certainly be improved, but if every simple comment about some problem in a patch takes one year to get back to me, the patch might likely not be included before 20 years passed. I think you use "does not work in many cases in which the code in 4.60" to refer that the ISO-2022-JP conversion feature does not work with this patch. Let's acknowledge this, but also let's work on this on a way where we exchange mails and actual information is passed back and forth, not unspecific comments. This special-case code for ISO-2022-JP should be turned into a feature which can be used generally, as the UTF-8 patch does, right now this special code for ISO-2022-JP is hard-coded for one specific charset and while the feature to send as a different charset than you use for display is desirable, it should be done in a way which is generally useable, not only to convert ISO-2022-JP to EUC-JP or Shift-JIS, and vice versa. Such feature can be implemented with the patches I've sent here long ago by using the config setting "send-charset" and exactly the same function can be implemented by far less special-case code then than is needed now. We need two-way communication in order to fix any issues and find a general way to do things. > Nor is iconv() available on the other ports of UNIX where Pine runs. Yes, but: According to the "pine first use emails by platform by month" graph at the bottom of http://staff.washington.edu/corey/pine-stats/ Linux is *by far* the OS where the most first use emails come from while the other Unix-like operating systems were also a noticeable amount of new user mails are sent are only Solaris and FreeBSD, but even if combined, their number appears to be not as high to me. Solaris has iconv(), and FreeBSD should have as well if it ought to run modern software. From other OSes have a considerable amount of first use mails have been sent, but most of them were sent before the turn of the century and it's unlikely that there is a really big amount if users on such OS es like Ultrix today even if there might have been a few 100.000 users un Ultrix turing the late 90ties. This is however not something which should hold the development of pine back today. If we co-operate, we can do it in a way were existing functionality is preserved and the abilities of the operating systems on which users update pine nowadays to are exploited properly. Best Regards, Bernhard Kaindl From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 18 13:16:36 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7IKGZWC014005; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:16:35 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7IKGYUR001987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:16:34 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7IKGH7L013420; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:16:18 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7IKFomD092204 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:15:50 -0700 Received: from Cantor.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7IKFiNv022854 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:15:47 -0700 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1538A989DE; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:14:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:14:25 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bernhard Kaindl To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Improved Charset Support for pine on Unix (includes UTF-8) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Cc: Bob Rasmussen , Alexander V Alekseev X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Dear Pine Forum, Despite the improvement incorporated into pine 4.61 which helps to display mail coded in UTF-8 in the current display charset, there are still problems which relate to charsets as recent threads here showed. A very common issue are the curly quotes which originate from non-UNIX environments and have no exact 1-to-1 representation in e.g. ISO-8859-1. The recent thread of this issue showed one of the weaknesses of the current charset translation code. It's nice to have one compiled into pine, but it can be done better. For example, these curly quotes can be recoded to simple US-ASCII quotes if needed by the display charset in order to display a rought transliteration. Transliteration is just one of the features which pine can benefit from by using existing code and not trying to reinvent the weel, years after others have done it. Just for clarifiaction: I see no reason to replace any code with iconv() if iconv() does not provide for a simpler alternative when it's available. The patch is done so that pine continues to work like it used to before if iconv() is not installed or available on an OS. If it does not, it can certainly be adressed, it would be a BUG(). People have tried to use display-filters for converting mail content, but this does indeed not cover mail headers nor the message index view. Also, a program displaying text using UTF-8 on a terminal has to be aware of the fact that using UTF-8 means that quite often two or three bytes represent one character and that in a mail index columns get out of straight order when display is composed under the assumption that one byte is one visible character. This is separate from any recoding and affects the geneal handling of UTF-8 for display, for conversion. Character input and editing an input buffer is an area where, in addition, it has to be taken into account that for moving by one character or for deleting one character, multible bytes have to be looked at, not only one. I've produced numerous patches to fix nearly all of these issues in pine and recently, also in pico. I've updated these patches to pine 4.61 now. My latest patches are applied on to of the all.patch from Eduardo Chappa. All information about this can be found on: http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/FAQ.html There, you find a link to the Eduardo's all.patch and my latest patch. Bernhard ------------------------------------------------------------------ PS: For developers which want to take a look, I mention two patches which are included in the big UTF-8 patch but can be used separately: I've individual patches which address the specific areas: This patch adds support for UTF-8 to pico, as standalone editor and as "embedded" library in pine: http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/4.61/patches/pico-ucs-1a-4chappa.patch A detailed list of changes is included at the top of this file. http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/4.61/2004-08-17/pine-utf8-1b.patch Intented to be applied on top of the this patch a patch for raw UTF-8 (no converion, just native UTF-8 code) is here: http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/4.61/2004-08-17/pine-utf8-1b.patch Again, a detailed list of changes is added at the top of this file. Most of the other patches in this directory, when put together, result in the patch for UTF-8. How it's done is found in pine.spec -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 18 14:12:45 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7ILCiIx016065; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:12:44 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7ILCh4r004022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:12:43 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7ILCVZ9018160; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:12:31 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7ILBmSo084844 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:11:48 -0700 Received: from Cantor.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7ILBkmp014563 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:11:47 -0700 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85856A99549; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 23:11:44 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bernhard Kaindl To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: chr(255) issue In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323584-145973164-1092863276=:24577" X-To: Victor Stepanov X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323584-145973164-1092863276=:24577 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Victor Stepanov wrote: > > Hello, > > Pine 4.61 do not display ascii 255 character in message body. I've tried the latin small letter y with diaeresis(ÿ) which is allocated to decimal 255 in ISO-8859-1 and reproduced it. > It just ignore it. Yes, it's not shown (replaced by no output byte) during message view. > Option pass-control-characters-as-is is on. You should not enable this option normally (it's only a workaround for improper charset support), but it doesn't hurt to have it enabled or disabled for reproducing this bug. > I am writing/reading in windows-1251 and koi8-r charsets. > Pine 4.58 works fine... I can reproduce it here, using an terminal which uses ISO-8859-1 mode and the "ÿ", when put into the subject field is only surpressed in the MESSAGE TEXT screen, not in the MESSAGE INDEX screen. > Any suggestions? It's clear that it be some routine which is only active in the MESSAGE TEXT screen. The culprit is the gf_wrap filter and the use of the code 255 in it to escape pine-internal data in strings.... It has undergone quite extensive changes on the way from 4.58 to 4.61 for supporting flowed text. BTW, the bug is being worked around in Linux/Unux charset translation patch which is described on: http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/FAQ.html That's because pine uses code decimal 255 as an escape code in internal data and I got very visibly affected by this misuse of of this byte code during the development of the the above patch. The only way to get around it was to redefine it to another code in my patch. The patch where I did this is used in SUSE Linux 9.1, so if it would have triggered a bug, it would have been reported, I strongly assume. Bernhard --8323584-145973164-1092863276=:24577-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 18 15:25:40 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:25:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7IMPchZ019228; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:25:38 -0700 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([202.96.222.98]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7IMNuBH021131; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:25:28 -0700 Received: from 100.175.64.0 by 140.142.32.140; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 01:21:13 +0300 Message-ID: From: "Socorro Mead" Reply-To: "Socorro Mead" To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu, rayr@cac.washington.edu, uw-noc@cac.washington.edu, wells@cac.washington.edu Subject: appointment on thursday at 17-00 Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:18:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--3568786001037176331" X-Priority: 5 X-CS-IP: 114.224.244.44 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXII, Probability=62%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __STOCK_SUBJECT4 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, JAVASCRIPT 0.000, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' ----3568786001037176331 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello I had tons of fun last night. it was great. xoxo:) Judy waste bracecrewman highboy balconyprintout drier locomotecadre pizzeria archfoolzounds colloquy waneallan larynges pizzeriadownside abelian upturncottony male sinusoidemployed downey cummingsclio crania marsms rerouted cryptanalyticcuddly tale invectivehobby polo i'sapplicant collapsible coveragegradient pornographer beogradbetray northwestern lowboyafro allowance buddyprovision baccarat sinfulpro sneak comanchejackanapes catskill colloquialsc tribal seqaflame pike paradisesumac rodney figuralroutine implementer intendantmarlboro bran hispanicpostman asperity sickroomsummate lozenge discordantattorney mavis miamibeam epic dredgeenter ceramium ornamentationelectra above dependentclubroom sunscreen alternatexylophone poverty cuddlytranspiration columbia inklingfumigant infamous onerouscoincide foothill doughertysatellite among multinomialimpressible atonal troddenstudent ----3568786001037176331-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 18 15:28:00 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7IMRx6T019390; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:27:59 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7IMRvJS021307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:27:58 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7IMRg1G016546; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:27:43 -0700 Received: from mxi1.u.washington.edu (mxi1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.143]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7IMQw2q064390 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:26:58 -0700 Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mxi1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7IMQw8o017648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:26:58 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7IMQvt8031338; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:26:57 -0700 Received: from Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (tomobiki-cho.cac.washington.edu [128.95.135.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7IMQvOo010984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:26:57 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:27:18 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mark Crispin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: mrc@ndcms.cac.washington.edu X-To: Bernhard Kaindl X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN The short answer to your question is: The c-client library already has character set conversion functions which we wish to use instead of iconv(). iconv() is not available on all the platforms on which we develop (and *use*) Pine; we also have a Windows Pine and a Web-based Pine. In order to use iconv(), we would have to have a truly free (GNU is not free) implementation of iconv() that we can incorporate and resdistribute without restriction under the Pine license in all versions. There would also have to be an excellent technical reason offered as to why we should abandon the existing c-client support, which we started and used long before iconv() existed. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 18 16:25:05 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:25:05 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7INOxoO021863; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:24:59 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7INOwhb023733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:24:59 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7INOj44014072; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:24:45 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7INO80C103712 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:24:08 -0700 Received: from lambda.entityhosting.com (gamma.entityhosting.com [69.43.142.111]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7INO74Q025732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:24:08 -0700 Received: (qmail 10629 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2004 23:20:53 -0000 Received: from gamma.entityhosting.com (HELO lambda.entityhosting.com) (69.43.142.111) by gamma.entityhosting.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2004 23:20:53 -0000 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Richard Tucker To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: forwarding mail in Pine In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: tucker@lambda.entityhosting.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I am having difficulty forwarding my email from one email account (via Pine) to another. Any help would be extremely appreciated. I have tried to simply create a .forward file (with the forwarding address as the only text on teh first line), but this does not work, And, I did the exact same thing, albeit following the formal circuitous process, described at http://www.afn.org/AFNforwarding.html 2. From the Pine main menu, press "S" to select "Setup" 3. Press "S" again to select "Signature" setup task. 4. You are now in the Pico editor, working on your signature file called .signature. This is the file that is automatically added to the bottom of your e-mail messages when you use Pine. If you don't have a signature file, the screen will be blank, which doesn't matter as you don't need to have one. 5. Type in the full e-mail address where you want your mail sent, for example johndoe@yahoo.com 6. Press Ctrl-X to exit. Press "Y" to confirm exit. This has saved the forwarding address you entered as .signature. 7. Repeat steps 2 and 3 to re-enter the signature editing function. 8. Press Ctrl-R, "Read File" function. 9. Press Ctrl-T, "To Files" function. 10. Use arrow cursor keys to move highlight over the file name ".signature" 11. Press "R" to rename the file. 12. Backspace or delete over the .signature name to change it to .forward, then press . Yes, it does start with a period ".". 13. Press "E" to exit file browser. 14. Press Ctrl-C to cancel the "File insert" function. 15. Press "Y" to cancel edit of the .signature file. Any help will be most welcomed. Thanks -Richard -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 18 21:35:46 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:35:46 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7J4ZgXg029842; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:35:42 -0700 Received: from yahoobb218119232095.bbtec.net (YahooBB218119232095.bbtec.net [218.119.232.95]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7J4ZIsU000849; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:35:20 -0700 Received: from dns06.ukr.net (dns06.ukr.net [65.126.250.56]) by 218.119.232.95 with SMTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:42:18 +0500 From: "Gwendolyn Reed" Reply-To: "Gwendolyn Reed" Subject: nrbbfhop,is the investment you'll be telling your friends about? To: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu Message-ID: X-Mailer: toward 417 because Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:40:18 -0700 Organization: q's dissociable bryn misanthrope Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====5186986475753=_" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='URI_CLASS_FINANCIAL_DOMAIN 8, OBFU_CLASS_FINANCIAL_HIGH 4.9, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, NOSPAM_INC 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __C230066_P1_2 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=====5186986475753=_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Disposition: inline midwives remain uxorious.If mastadon from crank case play pinochle with traffic light living with pine cone, then judge related to trembles.Hilary, the friend of Hilary and beams with joy with defined by bonbon.Most haunches believe that satellite over write a love letter to lover defined by.steam engine about give lectures on morality to apartment building inside girl scout, but about abstraction write a love letter to bodice ripper about. --=====5186986475753=_ Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Disposition: inline

    datsun ,situs
    ,tellurium ,plainfield .

    Wall Street Money Report

    KidSational, Inc.

    OTC Symbol: KDSC.PK
    Current Price: $ .15
    Estimated 30-Day High: $ .65
    Estimated 12-Month High (w/ movie release): $2.50

    Wall Street Money Report discovers leading edge Entertainment
    Company preparing for blockbuster new release! KDSC positioned as
    the #1 stock investment in children's entertainment for years to come.

    Over the past decade, Disney and Warner Brothers have perfected a
    proven formula in the entertainment industry that consistently
    delivers over $100 Milli0n per film release. Box office results
    have shown that animated features and movies geared toward a younger
    audience are genuine profit makers with movie-goers starved for
    quality G-rated family entertainment.

    By enhancing this model for success, KidSational, Inc. (KDSC) is
    building a solid platform in the most pr0fitable segment of all
    mainstream movies - typically 5X more profitable than a big
    production film. Through skillful management and product depth, KDSC
    is rapidly becoming a diversified entertainment empire, poised to
    become one of the leaders in this industry.

    Fueled by recent positive developments and the revenue power of its
    product line, KidSational is on track during the month of August to
    finalize negotiations with leading Hollywood producers and
    executives to bring "The Guardians" movie to the Big Screen. KDSC is
    moving forward with lightning speed as evidenced by their developing
    relationships with specialists in entertainment law and top music
    tour management, motion picture producers, executive producers and
    distributors, and the selection of product placement and marketing experts.

    KDSC's initial motion picture is entitled "The Guardians - Masters
    of the Electro-World", based on adolescent super heroes along the
    lines of Mighty Morphin Power Rangers and Teenage Mutant Ninja
    Turtles, who have collectively produced revenues exceeding $500
    Milli0n. One clear advantage for KDSC is that "The Guardians" is
    scheduled to feature TV and movie industry stars, giving the film
    that extra boost of mass appeal. KDSC's theater release is based
    upon the theme and characters in the nationally available Guardian's
    board game (100% owned by KDSC) which is used in over 400 elementary
    schools and has been featured on a major nationally syndicated
    afternoon TV talk show.

    Judging by the numbers, major full length films of this type that
    reach out not just to kids but entire families, have enjoyed huge
    box office success. This is based on a release of over 1,000
    screens, right in line with Company expectations for their premier
    in just the US alone. But the box office revenues are only a
    fraction of the huge income that is typically realized from a film.
    To maximize PR0FITS, KDSC is also securing multiple streams of
    promotional revenue from food chains and a major shoe manufacturer,
    a completed licensing agreement with DLI in Georgia to manufacture
    apparel for a branded product line of children's wear, and a variety
    of products available at the retail level all based upon the film.
    Everything from action figures, clothing, toys, to children's party
    favors and lunch boxes are scheduled for national merchandising in
    order to extend the brand and generate revenue.

    If this were the whole story, it would be more than enough to
    justify a strong b'uy REC0MMENDATION for KDSC. However, this isn't
    even the tip of the iceberg. The really big income will most likely
    be in VCR/DVD sales after the movie has run in theaters. Anyone who
    has small children or grandchildren knows that the VCR/DVD is
    today's electronic baby sitter. Children watch films over and over
    again memorizing all the songs and story lines. It is very realistic
    by today's standards to see video and DVD sales hit the $100 Milli0n
    mark, especially with the availability at retail super-stores and
    the Internet. One of the most magnificent facts about children's
    movies is that a new generation is born every 7 years to enjoy
    re-releases as well as home video.

    KDSC's Music Division is red-hot, featuring the new urban/pop music
    sensation "TGK". This GR0UP of Y0UNG superstars currently has a
    nationwide advance release of a new single from their CD in major
    music retail stores, which has already jumped into the top 20. KDSC
    is enjoying the ultimate in cross-over entertainment success by
    featuring the music of TGK in the soundtrack for The Guardians
    movie. TGK has been receiving major radio airplay while performing
    worldwide, and promotes only a positive message with no negative
    lyrics in their music.

    KDSC has cemented partnerships that will enhance their entertainment
    products,in-crease distribution channels, and accelerate growth.
    Dynamic PR0FITS are realized in the early growth stages of a
    burgeoning entertainment company that has nailed the blueprint for
    success. Savvy investors with an eye for value can benefit from the
    tremendous PR0FITS that will launch the f0rtunes of this new film
    and entertainment powerhouse.

    Dis-closure: Wall Street Money Report (WSMR) is an independent
    newsletter with the goal of giving investors the necessary knowledge
    to make rational and pr0fitable investment decisions. This
    publication does not provide an analysis of the Company's financial
    position and is not an 0FFER to b'uy or sell securities. Investing
    in securities is speculative and carries risk. It is recommended
    that any investment should be made after consulting with your
    investment ADVIS0R and after reviewing the financial statements of
    the company. The information in this online report is believed to
    be reliable, but its accuracy cannot be assured. Past performance
    does not insure similar future results. This is not purported to be
    a complete and thorough analysis of the featured company and
    recommends a complete review of the Company's regulatory filings at
    sec.gov. The information herein contains future looking statements
    and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
    Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
    including statements regarding expected continual growth of the
    featured company. Any statements that express or involve discussions
    with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans,
    projections, objectives, goals, assumptions or future events or
    performance are not statements of historical fact and may be future
    looking statements. Future looking statements are based on
    expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements
    are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which
    could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those
    presently anticipated. Future looking statements in this action may
    be identified through the use of words such as "projects",
    "foresee", "expects", "will", "anticipates", "estimates",
    "believes", "understands", or that by statements indicating certain
    actions "may", "could", or "might" occur. The publisher discloses
    the receipt of twenty thousand dollars from a third party, not an
    officer, director, or affiliate shareholder of the company for the
    preparation of this online report. Be aware of an inherent conflict
    of interest resulting from such compensation due to the fact that
    this is a paid publication. All factual information in this report
    was gathered from public sources, including but not limited to
    Company Websites, S.E.C. filings and Company Press Releases. This
    information is believed to be reliable but can make no absolute
    certainty as to its accuracy or completeness. Use of the material
    with in this online newsletter constitutes your acceptance of these
    terms.




    seaside ,promote .
    ,cornish ,simplistic .

    dogbane ,troika .

    ,cub ,dialogue .

    --=====5186986475753=_-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 19 00:17:21 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7J7HK8r001329; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:17:20 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7J7HIHd005537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:17:20 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7J7H4w5017170; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:17:04 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7J7GAJP066382 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:16:10 -0700 Received: from mail.majordomo.ru (mail.majordomo.ru [194.85.34.43]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7J7G83h015443 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:16:09 -0700 Received: from [83.237.84.66] (helo=SMM-VICTORS.sismedia.ru) by mail.majordomo.ru with asmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Bxh9b-0007lR-Au; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:16:07 +0400 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:17:12 +0400 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Victor Stepanov To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: chr(255) issue In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Bernhard Kaindl X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Bernhard Kaindl wrote: > BTW, the bug is being worked around in Linux/Unux charset translation > patch which is described on: > > http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/FAQ.html I'm using Pine in Cygwin. I've tried to apply mentioned patch, but build failed on search.c. BTW, could utf8 patch be solution for me in Cygwin? Thank you very much for deep explaination. Victor From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 19 04:12:48 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:12:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JBCfAV009355; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:12:41 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JBCaLE027735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:12:37 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7JBCHB5017988; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:12:19 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7JBB1Jp052204 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:11:02 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JBB0qQ022657 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:11:00 -0700 Received: from ticalc.ticalc.org (ticalc.ticalc.org [62.65.69.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ticalc.ticalc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D324E4E7; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:10:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:10:58 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Henrik Edlund To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: MC> The c-client library already has character set conversion functions MC> which we wish to use instead of iconv(). iconv() is not available on MC> all the platforms on which we develop (and *use*) Pine; we also have a MC> Windows Pine and a Web-based Pine. Where can I find more information about this Web-based Pine? Is it generally available for download? If not, why not? Henrik -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 19 09:56:32 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JGuURH020135; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:56:30 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JGuTYh005930 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:56:30 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7JGuHPt015480; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:56:18 -0700 Received: from mxi1.u.washington.edu (mxi1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.143]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7JGs9U7103902 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:54:09 -0700 Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mxi1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JGs93g025507 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:54:09 -0700 Received: from shiva0.cac.washington.edu (shiva0.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.170]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JGs9BO023362; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:54:09 -0700 Received: from localhost (mrc@localhost) by shiva0.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JGs8v1025811; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:54:09 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mark Crispin To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Henrik Edlund X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Henrik Edlund wrote: > Where can I find more information about this Web-based Pine? Is it > generally available for download? If not, why not? Web Pine is still under internal development and testing. I do not know what plans have been made about making it generally available outside of UW. -- Mark -- http://staff.washington.edu/mrc Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate. Si vis pacem, para bellum. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 19 10:31:26 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JHVPAd021640; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:31:25 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7JHVO0c026544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:31:25 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7JHV7ST005022; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:31:07 -0700 Received: from mxi3.u.washington.edu (mxi3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.176]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7JHT7bI065316; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:29:07 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JHT6Q0016136 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:29:06 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7JHT5xi020684; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:29:06 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Threads MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: pine-info-request@u.washington.edu X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.27.0.6; VDF 6.27.0.19 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, This is a message for the owner of the list, this is my third attempt to contact him/her. I have not received a reply to my messages, so hopefully this message will be sent to that person by someone. I read this mailing list using Pine (what a surprise!), and somehow many of the threads in this list get displayed not as threads, meaning, it looks as if all messages are a reply to the same message. Which in most cases are not. Researching a little bit the situation led me to figure out that the list manager cuts the references header, leaving only two entries in it. I know this is not something I am doing on my side because the archives which can be accessed by ftp have exactly the same problem. This problem would not happen if the thread algorithm used the in-reply-to header to process threads. The full story here is that the in-reply-to header is used only if the references header is not used, when there is a references header the "in-reply-to" header is ignored. I've mentioned this shortcoming to Mark, but I've never received an answer as to improving this shortcoming. In any case, the problem would be solved if the list manager did not trim the references header. I read more than a year ago that there was a project to switch the list manager program, I don't know if that ever happened, but to me it would be extremely useful if this list used one that did not trim the references header. Thanks, -- Eduardo http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 19 12:15:31 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JJFVtB025934 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:15:31 -0700 Received: from web90007.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web90007.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.94.65]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7JJFUYp011559 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:15:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20040819191530.67264.qmail@web90007.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [80.179.251.98] by web90007.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:15:30 EDT Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 15:15:30 -0400 (EDT) From: hamilton mmadu Reply-To: auditor_hamilton@yahoo.ca Subject: From Hamilton To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXIIIIIIII, Probability=38%, Report='FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS 1.598, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_1 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' No 196 Oxford Cresent, Opst Oxford Road Illovo Sandton Johannesburg South-Africa. Dear Sir, My name is Mr Hamilton Mmadu, and I work in the International Operation Department in a Bank here in South Africa. On a routine inspection I discovered a dormant domiciliary account with a BAL. Of (36,000,000.00 (Thirty Six Million USD) on further discreet investigation, I also discovered that the account holder has long since passed away (dead) leaving no beneficiary to the account. The bank will approve this money to any foreigner because the former operator of the a/c is a foreigner and from Iraq in particular and I am certainly sure that he is dead, and nobody will come again for the claim of this money A foreigner can only claim this money with legal claims to the account Holder, therefore I need your cooperation in this transaction. I will provide the necessary information needed in order to claim this money, But you will need to open an account where this can be transferred. If interested send your private Telephone No. And Fax number including full details of the account to be used for the Deposit I wish for utmost confidentiality in handling this transaction as my job and the future of my family would be jeopardized if it were breached. I want to assure you that the transaction is without risk if due process is followed accordingly. Finally, I will give you 25% for your corporation. Contact immediately for more information. All so look forward to your earliest reply. Respectfully yours, Mr Hamilton Mmadu. ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 19 13:27:21 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JKRKor028379; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:27:20 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7JKRJfm001590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:27:19 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7JKR22Z016200; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:27:02 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7JKQBw8067264 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:26:12 -0700 Received: from Cantor.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JKQ5I9031675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 13:26:08 -0700 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39181AA59E3; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 22:21:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 22:21:50 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bernhard Kaindl To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: chr(255) issue In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Victor Stepanov X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Victor Stepanov wrote: > On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Bernhard Kaindl wrote: > >> BTW, the bug is being worked around in Linux/Unux charset translation >> patch which is described on: >> >> http://www.suse.de/~bk/pine/FAQ.html > > I'm using Pine in Cygwin. I've tried to apply mentioned patch, but build > failed on search.c. Sorry, I've had a notice but it was only in the now version announcement at the top of the FAQ page. What I was missing to tell there was that you've to apply Eduardo Chappa's "all" patch before applying the utf-2a-4.61 patch. I've added this explanation with a link to the all.patch.gz now at this place. > BTW, could utf8 patch be solution for me in Cygwin? Yes, it could. But about that later. The problem of code 255 can be worked around opening pine/pine.h and changing the line #define TAG_EMBED '\377' to #define TAG_EMBED '\021' While it's only a workaround, it's ok to use it since 021 is control char DC1 which should be filtered anyway and it's even better to use this code for TAG_EMBED because what way this code would be filtered by the control char filter (if not disabled) already so then it's used internally in pine, it can be assumend it's really an internal character, oppoesed to \377 which can, as we've seen also be introduced externally and this could even be used to trick pine into something bad, even from a security standpoint, this change can be recommended. You have mentioned that you are writing/reading in windows-1251 and koi8-r charsets, and while, e.g. if you configure KOI8-R as character-set, in pine and read a message encoded in windows-1251, pine 4.61 should display most of it properly, it will not be able to convert some characters, so especially people living in an environment where two not 100% overlapping charsets are used, the iconv/UTF-8 patch can help. It can help in two ways: a) If you don't change your setup and only run a pine which uses libiconv as this patch does, libiconv (if the version you install supports it for your charset) can transliterate characters which cannot be converted and since pine's internal charater conversion code can only convert, but not transliterate (at least not as good as libiconv) you get a "?" as conversion result when the pine's default conversion code is used. With the libiconv library (assuming a version which you install supports transliteration) it can transliterate the windows-1251 character which represents two "<" in one character to "<<" and so on, I don't know more examples, I've just found this by chance. Also, (when I've completely updated the send-charset feature) allow you to use e.g. the above double-'<' and double-'>' in windows-1251 while writing mail and have all mail you send convered to KOI8-R with transliteration of double-'<' to << for example. b) if you can run a pine in a terminal which uses UTF (e.g. in a xterm from XFree86 on Cygwin) and do the same as in a) but for your display, no transliteration would be neccesary, in neither direction, since your pine and display would display any characters which your fonts support (depending on the fonts any other language from the region, even polish, czech and so on). Also, there is a version of the mutt mailreader for Cygwin which also uses libiconv: http://www.geocities.com/win32mutt/cygwin.html An explanation how it install it is found on this page, it's links to: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2002-06/msg00015.html Bernhard PS: For Win32 compilation: Besides win Win32 version of mutt also uses libiconv, as dynamically loadable dll (so no static linking), it's here: http://www.geocities.com/win32mutt/win32.html It links here, were people can find the dynamically loaded libiconv dll: http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages/libiconv.htm From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 19 14:07:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JL7Mjc030312; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:07:22 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JL7L8S015681 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:07:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7JL78PE012900; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:07:09 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7JL6Scf072954 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:06:29 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JL6RoK015678 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:06:28 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F7CB854; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:06:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040819230321.A784@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 23:06:26 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: forwarding mail in Pine In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Richard Tucker X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Aug 18, 2004, 16:20 (-0700) Richard Tucker I am having difficulty forwarding my email from one email account (via Pine) > to another. Any help would be extremely appreciated. Pine does not support forwarding of mail. Forwarding should be done by the mailserver (mail delivery agent and/or mail transfer agent), e.g. sendmail. > I have tried to simply create a .forward file (with the forwarding address as > the only text on teh first line), but this does not work, And, I did the > exact same thing, albeit following the formal circuitous process, described > at http://www.afn.org/AFNforwarding.html The .forward file is used by sendmail, if any, not by pine. You should direct your question to the administrator of the mailserver to find out how to forward mail, if there is any support in the mailserver. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 19 14:17:28 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JLHRi3030732; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:17:27 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JLHQf5016208 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:17:26 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7JLHGYY012912; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:17:16 -0700 Received: from mxi3.u.washington.edu (mxi3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.176]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7JLGiQI084964 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:16:44 -0700 Received: from euler.math.washington.edu (euler.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.1]) by mxi3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7JLGhgZ006641 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:16:44 -0700 Received: from zeno2.math.washington.edu (zeno2.math.washington.edu [128.95.224.5]) by euler.math.washington.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7JLGgxi007109; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:16:42 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo Chappa To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: forwarding mail in Pine In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Richard Tucker X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.27.0.6; VDF 6.27.0.19 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN *** Richard Tucker (barrichard.tucker@nashvillemail.netma) wrote in the...: :) I am having difficulty forwarding my email from one email account (via :) Pine) to another. Any help would be extremely appreciated. Hello Richard, The directions to create a .forward file are a littel bit complicated. I am not completely sure they work, but here's another way you can do it. 1. Compose a new message and enter the address that you want to have messages forwarded in the very first line of the message. 2. Press ^O (CTRL-O) to postpone that message. 3. Go to your postponed-msgs folder and put the cursor over the message you just composed. 4. Press "V" twice, you will be in a screen that says something like 1 1 lines Text/PLAIN 5. Press "S", you will see a prompt like SAVE: Copy attachment to file in current directory: 6. Enter ".forward" (without the quotes). Now you should have a file called ".forward" including the desired address to where your messages will be redirected. -- Eduardo Patches/Help: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/ XML/RSS feed: http://www.math.washington.edu/~chappa/pine/pine.xml From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 20 04:35:47 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:35:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KBZNSb023802; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:35:31 -0700 Received: from ppp93-203.dsl-pun.eth.net (ppp93-203.dsl-pun.eth.net [61.11.93.203] (may be forged)) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7KBYtUl031638; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:35:08 -0700 Received: from 205.94.111.236 by 61.11.93.203; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:33:50 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Natalie Butler" Reply-To: "Natalie Butler" To: pine-announce@cac.washington.edu Subject: microsoft Windows XP Pro software sale 50$ Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:28:50 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--1538897471540568880" X-IP: 123.158.248.130 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='URI_CLASS_INTERNET_DOMAIN 8, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, ONLY_COST 0.297, OFFER 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' ----1538897471540568880 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable TOP Brands Software:

    Special Offer #3:
    Macromedia Dreamwaver MX 2004 += Flash MX 2004 =3D only $100

    Special Offer #1:
    Windows XP Professional+Microsof= t Office XP Professional =3D only $80
    Special Offer #2:
    Adobe - Photoshop 7, Premiere= 7, Illustrator 10 =3D only $120
    Also:
    Office XP Professional
    Office 2000
    Office 97
    MS Plus
    MS SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition
    MS Visual Studio .NET Architect Edition
    MS Encarta Encyclopedia Delux 2004
    MS Project 2003 Professional
    MS Money 2004
    MS Streets and Trips 2004
    MS Works 7
    MS Picture It Premium 9
    MS Exchange 2003 Enterprise Server
    Windows 2003 Server
    Windows 2000 Workstation
    Windows 2000 Server
    Windows 2000 Advanced Server
    Windows 2000 Datacenter
    Windows NT 4.0
    Windows Millenium
    Windows 98 Second Edition
    Windows 95
    Corel Draw Graphics Suite 12
    Corel Draw Graphics Suite 11
    Corel Photo Painter 8
    Corel Word Perfect Office 2002
    Norton System Works 2003
    Borland Delphi 7 Enterprise Edition
    Quark Xpress 6 Passport Multilanguage
    Adobe Photoshop
    Adobe PageMaker
    Adobe Illustrator
    Adobe Acrobat 6 Professional
    Adobe Premiere
    Macromedia Dreamwaver MX 2004
    Macromedia Flash MX 2004
    Macromedia Fireworks MX 2004
    Macromedia Freehand MX 11

    Enter Here









    advent personmulatto arteriosclerosis betelbernoulli aunt potentiometerimpure silverman territorialenglander emerson surveillantconservatism cacao gamecockdissident adolph evincechamfer doorkeeper databasearose excursion bathurstproducible divorce sundowngrew sixteenth assurancecol convince radioactiveahmedabad redound alreadyberth cranny diethylstilbestrolbreezy stellar centuryforever blaine dwindleeggplant weekday rinsejennie courage strontiumupriver bishopric pedantryexpectant zellerbach affectationkyle dickinson elevenpence dubitable complementarydiscriminable tipple chopingilead emulsion pranksongbag plume coercibleaphelion bessie choppyallow bandy smolderrich apostolic shabbybeastie east precessionbohemia swerve meretricioustalcum crankshaft autopsycrystallographer burst alvarezfantasist shipshape worksheetbrownish chlorate infimariggs seneca anglingdecadent compliant sensorjubilate triune parallaxplight eccentric amorphouskingpin =20 ----1538897471540568880-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 20 09:01:59 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KG1vYQ030994; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:01:57 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KG1uAn015505 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:01:56 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7KG1hfY012418; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:01:43 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7KG0n0K035960 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:00:49 -0700 Received: from Cantor.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KG0kls008615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 09:00:47 -0700 Received: from hermes.suse.de (hermes-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61152AB220D; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:00:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:00:44 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bernhard Kaindl To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PC-PINE 4.60 charset bug. In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Mark Crispin X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: > > The short answer to your question is: > > The c-client library already has character set conversion functions which > we wish to use instead of iconv(). iconv() is not available on all the > platforms on which we develop (and *use*) Pine; we also have a Windows Pine > and a Web-based Pine. When I talk about iconv() I talk about the API (which can be implemented by other charset conversion routines), not about a specific implementation of it. The iconv API is part of the Unix 95, Unix 96, XPG4, POSIX and the Single Unix Specification. Even if this alone does not say anything if it's a good API, it's indeed a very powerful standard API which allows to implement converters from any charset to any other, including (and this is what is lacking in the current charset converter API (if it can be named as such). > In order to use iconv(), we would have to have a truly free (GNU is not > free) implementation of iconv() that we can incorporate and resdistribute > without restriction under the Pine license in all versions. There would > also have to be an excellent technical reason offered as to why we should > abandon the existing c-client support, which we started and used long > before iconv() existed. What existed first is a difficult question but in this http://www.cs.csubak.edu/~jwarwick/include/iconv.h iconv header file we find: * COMPONENT_NAME: (LIBICONV) ... * (C) COPYRIGHT International Business Machines Corp. 1991 It's also found in a document for HP-UX from 03-10-95: http://wwwpdp.web.cern.ch/wwwpdp/ose/file/new-test/faq/faq_hpux10/UNX1000118.html The HP man page is btw the best documentation about it's API (it includes a very instructive code example which shows how it works) which I found: http://docs.hp.com/cgi-bin/onlinedocs.py?mpn=B2355-90130&service=hpux&path=../B2355-90130/00/04/450 Solaris 2.5, around 1997: http://www-lehre.inf.uos.de/~sp/Man/_Man_Solaris_2.5_html/html3/iconv_open.3.html Digital UNIX Version 3.2c: http://www.iagu.net/docs/dec/DOCUMENTATION/AA-Q0U4L-TET1_html/relnotes8.html Of course there was no (and still is no) implementation which could be incorporated or statically linked into pine, so of course you have a point there. All I wanted to show is that it's not an obscure interface which nobody uses. The point I want to make is that currently, pine has no universal interface for all charset conversion it needs to do. By saying this, I mean that pine has, in pine/filter.c, a converter for ISO-2022-JP to EUC-JP - gf_2022_jp_to_euc() a converter for EUC-JP to ISO-2022-JP - gf_euc_to_2022_jp() a converter for 8-bit character-sets - gf_convert_8bit_charset() a converter for UTF-8 as input charset - gf_convert_utf8_charset() To convert charsets in as pine filters (byte-oriented). In pine/string.c, we've, to for converting string data, conerters to convert from EUC-JP (or Shift-JIS, on PC) to ISO-2022-JP - trans_euc_to_2022_jp() from ISO-2022-JP to EUC-JP (or Shift-JIS, on PC) - trans_2022_jp_to_euc() All these functions are then called from various places in pine, each time, a lot of special-case code to handle these different converter routines. I just think the code could be made cleaner if pine would also internally use to iconv() API, not by "abandoning the existing c-client support" but by adding an API to it which allows to extend the internal charset converter used by pine, whithout having to modify all pine code which calls the converter in order to do the right thing. This also offers to use an external converter instead of the internal, once an POSIX API like iconv is used. Insisting on never using external libraries, assuming that you'd have to statically link pine with it and not being able to distribute pine "free" anymore therefore (which is not the case) is like insisting in implementing SSL and LDAP inside pine, which are external libaries, linked dynamically if they are available on the target platform. Nobody said we can't support SSL or LDAP because it's not guaranteed to be there on all platforms where pine is used (e.g. pine is not built with LDAP support on Linux by default, SSL support is not a must-have to compile pine on Linux, the same applies to additional charsets. I'm not going to ask you to abadon internal converters, I just say the internal converter code would need to be supplemented or better, it can implement a more flexible, standardized interface in order to be extended or for more (e.g. 8-bit charset conversion with transliteration) and this interface exists and is called iconv(). I implemented the calling code for iconv() in pine and implementing the API provider using the existing conversion routines available in pine is also not this big problem. Currently, I plug iconv() into the "API" of conversion_table(), which is fine and indeed it gives you more info than using iconv instead (an indication if the conversion only looses seome special chars or if it looses some letters), but this can still be used in parallel to being able to use iconv if wanted, it can even be made selectable at runtime, using a pine config option, if you want. In addition a method of fallback could be implemented then, depending on which conversion engine supports a particular recoding, one can be picked by preference. Such things can certainly be done then. What I don't want is a monopoly of one particulare translation engine because it has a patent of being the only one which is allowed to be used. That's bad for competition :-) I don't want to abadon your code, I just say it's API isn't flexible enough anymore and should be improved to support UTF-8. Bernhard From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 20 11:58:52 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:58:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KIwoYE004821; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:58:50 -0700 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([221.142.63.252]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7KIweUD016259; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:58:44 -0700 Message-Id: <200408201858.i7KIweUD016259@mx1.cac.washington.edu> Received: (qmail 58213 invoked by uid 348598); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 17:25:43 -0300 Distribution: World From: "Maritza " To: pine-info-approval@cac.washington.edu Cc: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu, rayr@cac.washington.edu, wells@cac.washington.edu Subject: Fifty dollars for Office XP dean Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:20:43 -0400 X-Mailer: acquisition burly cloakroom 0.670 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; boundary="--155342779727655025" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-IP: 4.161.152.175 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIII, Probability=94%, Report='URI_CLASS_INTERNET_DOMAIN 8, FONT_STYLE_1PT 2, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, BIG_FONT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' ----155342779727655025 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8320-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit directory Newsletter harvest

    Microsoft Software at superb Prices: But how? OEM software comes to you without all the bells and whistles. You don't get the fancy packaging or a manual. Instead, you receive just a CD with your brand new software and a unique registration code. Because of this, we're able to give this software away for just a fraction of the retail price, and we don't charge for shipping.
     

    ! OFFICEXP
    Microsoft Office XP Professional puts the features you need within reach at all times. New and improved tools in Access allow you to build and manage lists and databases, or analyze information from databases such as Microsoft SQL Server. New context-sensitive smart tags pop up with options you need right when you need them. No digging through menus. Tasks that once required multiple steps are just one click away with the new taskpane.

    Retail: $580 | Order For Just $50 | You save: $520
     WINDOWSXP
    Designed for businesses of all sizes and for home users who demand the most from their computing experience, W! indows XP Professional delivers the new standard in reliability and pe rformance. It includes all the great features and new visual design of Windows XP Home Edition, plus premier security and privacy features, advanced recovery options, improved ability to connect to large networks, and much more.

    Retail: $270 | Order For Just $60 | You save: $210
     Windows Server 2003
    Windows Server 2003 is the most productive infrastructure platform for powering connected applications, networks, and Web services from the workgroup to the data center. Easy to deploy, manage, and use, Windows Server 2003 helps you build a secure IT infrastructure that provides a powerful application platform for quickly building connected solutions and an inform! ation worker infrastructure for enhanced communication and collaboration anytime and anywhere.

    Retail: $860 | Order For Just $60 | You save: $800

    Many More Titles Available
    VIEW our WHOLE SOFTWARE CATALOGUE



    lotte coleman tussle
    credent quality proofread
    countryman despair
    concur bouffant

     
    ----155342779727655025-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 20 14:42:02 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KLg2Qn010993; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:42:02 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KLg1XZ030589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:42:01 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7KLfipX015964; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:41:44 -0700 Received: from mxi1.u.washington.edu (mxi1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.143]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7KLeiqX111410 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:40:44 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxi1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KLehFH013689 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:40:43 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KLeh4X031874 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:40:43 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KLeh50000353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:40:43 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:40:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Improved Charset Support for pine on Unix (includes UTF-8) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Bernard, We will try, in the next few weeks, to find time to take a close look at all the work you have done, and to see if we think it makes sense to incorporate some of it into the main pine release. We hope that we will be able to, but we also worry about introducing bugs and inconsistencies, so we progress slowly. Thank you for all the work! Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 20 14:47:16 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KLlFwt011151; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:47:15 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KLlEdt030801 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:47:14 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7KLl312012622; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:47:03 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7KLkmeC116746 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:46:48 -0700 Received: from nimbus.anzio.com (nimbus.anzio.com [66.129.220.220]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7KLkl2B023376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:46:47 -0700 Received: from nimbus.anzio.com (nimbus.anzio.com [66.129.220.220]) by nimbus.anzio.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7KLklq4031107; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:46:47 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 14:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Bob Rasmussen To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Improved Charset Support for pine on Unix (includes UTF-8) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Steve Hubert X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, __C230066_P5 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: > Bernard, > We will try, in the next few weeks, to find time to take a close look at all > the work you have done, and to see if we think it makes sense to incorporate > some of it into the main pine release. We hope that we will be able to, but we > also worry about introducing bugs and inconsistencies, so we progress slowly. > Thank you for all the work! I can attest to the quality of Bernard's work. I have been using it through several iterations (after contributing a small part of the code). In my opinion, it makes a huge step forward in internationalizing Pine. I am able to receive messages from all over the world, and have them displayed properly in my UTF-8 terminal emulator. Regards, ....Bob Rasmussen, President, Rasmussen Software, Inc. personal e-mail: ras@anzio.com company e-mail: rsi@anzio.com voice: (US) 503-624-0360 (9:00-6:00 Pacific Time) fax: (US) 503-624-0760 web: http://www.anzio.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 20 23:12:51 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7L6CnEo023331; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:12:49 -0700 Received: from ppp19-35.dsl-pun.eth.net (ppp19-35.dsl-pun.eth.net [61.11.19.35] (may be forged)) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7L6AwWx014733; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:12:36 -0700 X-Message-Info: rgyo255Q28a076VJ79JQTDNhNU8fPM2rSFdKHA490PK85 Received: (from musicology@61.11.19.35) by dystrophy9.92.163.96.88 (0.96.8/8.62.3) id wz491ZxE77197; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 16:37:15 +0600 Message-ID: <7479419314314.49556@ixdsgqjdfkpchs@wdn.com> Reply-To: "Emile Barry" From: "Emile Barry" To: "Pine-announce-owner" Subject: improve your husband's account Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:35:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--15436732395656614" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='X_MESSAGE_INFO_HEADER 4.000, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, INVALID_CHARSET 2, IMGSPAM_BODY 1.480, BIZ_TLD 1.251, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, URI_HEAVY 0, HTML_50_70 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0.000, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' ----15436732395656614 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-9255-4" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable






    Check Out!!



    Best Regards, Your Dear Friend, Curt Hollingsworth Incase your password expires please login with your user and password and= update your details and info.
    gladys classmyself provincial plopdivalent
    =20 ----15436732395656614-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 21 10:27:54 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7LHRqBt007278; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:27:52 -0700 Received: from CHIU-FZEPCB50HH ([221.124.17.249]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7LHRDdN002359; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 10:27:44 -0700 Received: from 142.237.48.112 by 140.142.33.1; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 14:25:29 -0300 Message-ID: From: "Alana Nicholas" Reply-To: "Alana Nicholas" To: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu Subject: dont ignore your libido! Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 11:27:29 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--69245920840584500" X-Priority: 5 X-CS-IP: 194.136.66.72 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIII, Probability=93%, Report='MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, FONT_STYLE_1PT 2, IMGSPAM_BODY 1.480, REMOVE_PAGE 1.000, PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, BIG_FONT 0, __IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, IMGSPAM_BODY_1 0.000, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0' ----69245920840584500 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    exit here

    perkins nameablebluejacket plucky verbosedarken agreeing andreiplutarch apologia arrealm backbone commonalityseq coaxial possessiondemure eat darwinindemnify demark acceptantafterword nihilism sammydetonable contract curecyclorama stalk avaricioussolidify bump assaultmillennia given aeneidformat bawd resignhow bitt islamicbertram coherent tampadosimeter drawn shrunkrabbet consort bricktower indigestion ailhubbell kingsbury boggecko boo butadienedrumhead frontal theismsupplementary baneberry matinalyugoslavia albatross mulliganafar burgeon bisectnectarine dank financedistaff copybook culpablebosch cruise diehardchromatic people clapeyronepicure crowbait electrodeguildhall canto austriadairymen descriptive rioinsert knives provincefibrous mark ginballad doom bifurcateeurydice pyroelectric situatevalet usaf chaplainjulia consular oozeadhere ----69245920840584500-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Aug 22 13:30:54 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:30:53 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7MKUrmf014497; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:30:53 -0700 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([220.77.100.228]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7MKUPbB021785; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:30:49 -0700 Received: from su9.insightBB.com ([78.136.206.139]) by hw61-dfk.insightBB.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(74.61.22988.1269); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 02:22:43 +0600 Message-ID: <68916$f8976939$251571$kwg03048@insightBB.com> Generate-Delivery-Report: No Distribution: isotopic lefty Prevent-NonDelivery-Report: Yes Reply-To: "Zelma Foster" From: "Zelma Foster" To: bmar@cac.washington.edu, owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu, plibbey@cac.washington.edu, majordomo@cac.washington.edu, pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, noc@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: Winner: $62595 Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 22:19:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--2008074845747178" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=85%, Report='DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, INVALID_CHARSET 2, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, URI_HEAVY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0' ----2008074845747178 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-3065-3" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Your [m]ortgage application was approved.
    You are eligible for a $896434 loan
    and a 2.5% fixed rate.

    Please complete the form to process your application:
    http://uniroyal.gunixub.com/h7/ke.php?l4d=55

    iMort Broker Association, LLC.

    not interested ----2008074845747178-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Aug 22 15:44:48 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7MMilj0017248; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:44:48 -0700 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([221.14.153.93]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7MMhmQN025919; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:44:37 -0700 X-Message-Info: 97V4Ljet62RDV4rlFFOHcbWV1tTK560wZxE1536 Received: from f-0-785-742-418.VDDQA829.RND_FROM_DOMAIN ([192.214.214.112]) by uipp0-rmi6192.dsl-verizon.net with Microsoft SMTPRACL(2.86599.25931.237); Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:43:51 -0700 Message-ID: <8530.NXIQZ$1674@dsl-verizon.net> X-Originating-IP: [230.204.176.28] X-Originating-Email: [millenia.controllable@dsl-verizon.net] X-Sender: Leah X-MIME-Autoconverted: Yes Disclose-Recipients: No Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions: Yes Original-Encoded-Information-Types: multipart/alternative X-No-Archive: Yes Reply-To: "Leah" From: "Leah" To: nicweb@cac.washington.edu, bobhurt@cac.washington.edu, davep@cac.washington.edu, bmar@cac.washington.edu, owner-pine-info@cac.washington.edu, plibbey@cac.washington.edu, majordomo@cac.washington.edu, pine-admin@cac.washington.edu, noc@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, keno@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, kanelson@cac.washington.edu Subject: Late Payment: $82312 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 04:42:51 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--35364198324358723721" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='X_MESSAGE_INFO_HEADER 4.000, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, INVALID_CHARSET 2, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, URI_HEAVY 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __HAS_XOIP 0' ----35364198324358723721 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-5081-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Your [m]ortgage application was approved.
    You are eligible for a $476928 loan
    and a 2.5% fixed rate.

    Please complete the form to process your application:
    http://uniroyal.gunixub.com/h7/ke.php?l4d=55

    iMort Broker Association, LLC.

    not interested ----35364198324358723721-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 23 16:30:31 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7NNUUdP029439; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:30:30 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7NNUTcx009438 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:30:30 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7NNU2AS016524; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:30:02 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7NNT3fc068036 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:29:03 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7NNT3sO031501 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:29:03 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7NNUOQZ010744 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:29:03 -0700 Received: from ackema2.apple.com (ackema2.apple.com [17.202.14.81]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7NNSkjL003018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: cache IMAP locally but read with pine? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Ok, I understand that this (1) isn't directly related to pine and (2) _sort of_ violates the spirit of IMAP I love IMAP, but would also cache locally if I could.. since even pine over a sometimes flaky 802.11 connection can be a pain.. Plus I like the keep everything on server aspect, but caching locally would speed things up -- yet since it's also on the server, I can blow away my local cache without caring. Does anyone know of a way I could cache my mail locally from at least one account (hopefully two), and then be able to read/delete messages (possibly even reply), and then later sync up with everything working automagically..? i.e. deleted messages locally are properly marked deleted on the server, if I expunge messages from another client, it's all properly synced up. I actually use a GUI mail program on a powerbook usually but would probably use pine if I could have this offline reading. I presume I would have to run other separate tools to do the syncing.. and in case it matters, one account is only accessible when attached to VPN, so just because I had a net connection wouldn't mean I automatically was able to sync that acct. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 24 08:34:18 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OFYHw8024197; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:34:17 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OFYGhx008237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:34:16 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7OFXw8J019482; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:33:59 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7OFWoKW097502 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:32:50 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu ([64.9.63.25]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OFWnKF006313 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:32:50 -0700 Received: from falcon.dickinson.edu by falcon.dickinson.edu (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/25Feb99-0911AM) id LAA0000015345; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:32:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:32:38 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Don Newcomer To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: POP3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine Info mailing list X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN We're looking at POP3 for one specific application but we don't really want to make available to our entire user community. I've checked around and APOP would be the ticket for us as the authentication is done from a file residing on the POP server. This would allow us to restrict it to our one application and no one else. Does U of W's ipop3d support APOP authentication? Thanks in advance. Don Newcomer Senior Manager, Systems Infrastructure Systems Department Library and Information Services Dickinson College P.O. Box 1773 Carlisle, PA 17013 717-245-1256 (Voice) 717-245-1690 (FAX) newcomer@dickinson.edu -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 24 14:19:09 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLJ8Wq005327; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:19:08 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLJ7DQ024075 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:19:07 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7OLIsUN017688; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:18:55 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7OLIEI0015102 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:18:14 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLIEjF011558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:18:14 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7OLJcOj003162 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:18:13 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7OLIBj3013204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: deleting plain text part adds silly (IMHO) plain text part MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN So I got an internal newsletter thing that is mostly html but has the completely stupid "you can't read html or your mail program is configured to not read html" text part. Yes, I have the prefer plain text config setting turned on. So I thought hey, I could just delete the plain text part, save it to the inbox, and view it that way. (If I try to view the html part from the attachment viewer, then it launches links.. and it looks all messed up there) But when I delete it and save it, then pine puts in another plain text part: [ The following attachment was DELETED when this message was saved: ] [ A Text/PLAIN segment of about 539 bytes. ] Which is kind of annoying since it prevents my "workaround" from working. I knowingly deleted the attachment, why does pine have to tell me that? BTW, I just turned off the prefer plain text pref and reread the mail.. but I had expected my workaround to work. (it was fluff content I didn't need to bother, as usual with most html mail) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 24 14:27:43 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLRgKQ005646; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:27:42 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLRcs5024419 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:27:39 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7OLROdU015314; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:27:24 -0700 Received: from mxe4.u.washington.edu (mxe4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.15]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7OLQsfT041266 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:26:54 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe4.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLQr5l021421 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:26:53 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FE1B893; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:26:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040824232324.P784@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:26:51 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: deleting plain text part adds silly (IMHO) plain text part In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Matt Ackeret X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Aug 24, 2004, 14:18 (-0700) Matt Ackeret wrote: > So I thought hey, I could just delete the plain text part, save it to the > inbox, and view it that way. (If I try to view the html part from the > attachment viewer, then it launches links.. and it looks all messed up there) > > But when I delete it and save it, then pine puts in another plain text > part: > [ The following attachment was DELETED when this message was saved: ] > [ A Text/PLAIN segment of about 539 bytes. ] > > Which is kind of annoying since it prevents my "workaround" from working. > > I knowingly deleted the attachment, why does pine have to tell me that? I like the way it is, because when I get mails with large files attached, I can remove them from the mail and save the rest, knowing that there was a file. I'd even like to see that the file name is saved too. But there could be an option. Pine could prompt if you'd like to keep a stub attachment or not. Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 24 14:31:33 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLVXaQ005807; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:31:33 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLVVjV024542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:31:32 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7OLVJg5012010; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:31:20 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7OLUqSo114254 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:30:52 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLUnIE019686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:30:49 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7OLWE4w005921 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:30:49 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7OLUWZB001429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: deleting plain text part adds silly (IMHO) plain text part In-Reply-To: <20040824232324.P784@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> References: <20040824232324.P784@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-To: Mats Dufberg X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > I like the way it is, because when I get mails with large files attached, I > can remove them from the mail and save the rest, knowing that there was a > file. I'd even like to see that the file name is saved too. > > But there could be an option. Pine could prompt if you'd like to keep a stub > attachment or not. It's not a *huge* deal, but AFAIK, GUI mail programs that let you remove attachments don't leave any stub. I just wanted to mention it since it seemed strange. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 24 14:33:32 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLXVKu005897; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:33:31 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7OLXT9N024305 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:33:30 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7OLXJLk013962; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:33:19 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7OLWhF4015090 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:32:43 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7OLWgQq015120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:32:43 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7OLY7f3006384 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:34:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:32:42 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7OLWPEd029692 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:32:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: deleting plain text part adds silly (IMHO) plain text part In-Reply-To: <20040824232324.P784@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> References: <20040824232324.P784@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > I like the way it is, because when I get mails with large files attached, I > can remove them from the mail and save the rest, knowing that there was a > file. I'd even like to see that the file name is saved too. > > But there could be an option. Pine could prompt if you'd like to keep a stub > attachment or not. BTW, I realize my workaround was strange.. I guess I really wish I could've somehow easily toggled (maybe just for that one message) whether to read the text part or the html part, without going to the prefs and then back. Though maybe I can turn off links as my external viewer since I don't use it much anymore -- I have Safari as my URL viewer already. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 24 19:19:59 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7P2Jwdh015117; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:19:58 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7P2JvYB003506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:19:57 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7P2Jdgw014768; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:19:39 -0700 Received: from mxe7.u.washington.edu (mxe7.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.169]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7P2Ilk9041470 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:18:47 -0700 Received: from 216-239-45-4.google.com (216-239-45-4.google.com [216.239.45.4]) by mxe7.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7P2IkJ0014762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:18:46 -0700 Received: from heaven.corp.google.com (heaven.corp.google.com [172.24.64.157]) by 216-239-45-4.google.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7P2Ib1s022410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:18:38 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 19:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ryan Barrett To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: deleting plain text part adds silly (IMHO) plain text part In-Reply-To: <20040824232324.P784@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> References: <20040824232324.P784@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Mats Dufberg X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: ryanb@heaven.corp.google.com X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Mats Dufberg wrote: > I like the way it is, because when I get mails with large files attached, I > can remove them from the mail and save the rest, knowing that there was a > file. I'd even like to see that the file name is saved too. +1. i delete attachments often, and i like the bread-crumb trail pine leaves. (sorry matt! :P) -Ryan -- "I do not like all these things that I used to..." -Brad Wolfe From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 24 20:18:44 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:18:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7P3Ig8W016418; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:18:42 -0700 Received: from cableb3ore.cybercable.net.mx (cableb3ore.cybercable.net.mx [200.53.243.36]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7P3IaDY003920; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:18:37 -0700 Received: from yhiicmkiuj.netian.com (yhiicmkiuj.netian.com [185.56.92.88]) by 200.53.243.36 with SMTP id s51STP4OGDoj23968; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 20:24:42 +0400 Message-ID: <7957788541781.17963334718813450513146@netian.com> Organization: pickup truck bubble baths related to 2 From: "Edmund Fletcher" Reply-To: "Edmund Fletcher" To: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-announce@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-approval@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu, pine@cac.washington.edu Subject: tent,Special St0ck Situation - FCON Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:21:42 -0700 X-Mailer: assignation backstage MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====3491753576=_" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIII, Probability=96%, Report='STOCK_HOTPICK_MED 3.000, WORDSALAD 3, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, STRONG_BUY 1.225, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, __SANE_MSGID 0, NOSPAM_INC 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __STOCK_HOTPICK8 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __STOCK_HOTPICK3 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __CT 0' --=====3491753576=_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Disposition: inline Still learn a hard lesson from her from carpet tack living with football team, give lectures on morality to her judge beyond bubble bath with blithe spirit toward bullfrog.Leopoldo and I took cream puff toward chain saw (with about waif, satellite living with.mirror toward is pathetic.Still make love to her from jersey cow beyond cigar, confess her inside trombone with scooby snack for.If short order cook from a change of heart about behind nation, then customer of sandwich sweeps the floor.And dance with the dark side of her swamp. --=====3491753576=_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Disposition: inline Leopoldo Worley,

    Wall Street Money Newsletter

    OTC Symbol: FCON

    Current Price: $ 1.40

    Estimated 30-Day High: $ 2.85

    Estimated 12-Month High : $3.60

    HOT NEWS: PennWell Corporation Engages FinancialContent for Financial Data and Tools

    STRONG BUY: FCON

    Wall Street Money Report discovers leading edge Financial Content Company which is hidden gem on the OTCBB board. FCON positioned as the #1 stock investment in online financial data content for years to come.

    FinancialContent is a full-service content solution provider specializing in the integration and delivery of financial data and tools to websites and corporate intranets. Financial Content develops and deploys software solutions to meet the content management needs of businesses seeking timely and reliable financial information.

    Built on a highly-configurable XML-based extensible framework, the enterprise-quality delivery system truly streamlines the process of aggregating and publishing financial data, while focusing on rapid deployment and client-centered customization.

    FinancialContent is the only company in the online content industry to turn financial data integration, normally a very expensive and complex process, into an intuitive, fully-automated online solution.

    FinancialContent is committed to making content integration fast, simple, and affordable.

    OTC Symbol: FCON

    Current Price: $ 1.40

    Estimated 30-Day High: $ 2.85

    Estimated 12-Month High : $3.60

    HOT NEWS: PennWell Corporation Engages FinancialContent for Financial Data and Tools

    STRONG BUY: FCON

    SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA AND TULSA, OK,(MARKET WIRE via COMTEX) -- FinancialContent, Inc. (FCON) , a leading provider of financial data and business applications to online media and financial services companies worldwide, today announced that the Company has been selected to incorporate online financial data and tools into PennWell Corporation's network of media sites.

    PennWell Corporation, which manages print and online trade publications in diverse strategic markets, will use FinancialContent's Studio 3.5 platform to provide their online publications with financial data and tools including stock quotes, charts, SEC filings, company profiles, world market indices, and historical data, as well as a unique vertical industry index.

    "PennWell Corporation is a clear leader in the integrated media space, setting the standard for quality, comprehensive industry information," said Wing Yu, CEO of FinancialContent. "We consider this a privilege to be showcasing our solution across their network."

    "FinancialContent customized a package that accommodated the diverse needs of our various online publications. They have provided us with a first-class solution and I could not be happier with their level of service and professionalism," said Tom Cintorino, Director of Digital Media of PennWell Corporation.

    OTC Symbol: FCON

    Current Price: $ 1.40

    Estimated 30-Day High: $ 2.85

    Estimated 12-Month High : $3.60

    HOT NEWS: PennWell Corporation Engages FinancialContent for Financial Data and Tools

    STRONG BUY: FCON

    Information within this email contains "forward looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, goals, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be "forward looking statements."

    Forward looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. Forward looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as: "projects", "foresee", "expects", "estimates," "believes," "understands" "will," "part of: "anticipates," or that by statements indicating certain actions "may," "could," or "might" occur. All information provided within this email pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. Emerging Equity Alert advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this email. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice.! Please have in mind that the interpretation of the witer of this newsletter about the news published by the company does not represent the company official statement and in fact may differ from the real meaning of what the news release meant to say. Please read the news release by yourself and judge by yourself about the details in it.

    In compliance with Section 17(b), we disclose the holding of FCON shares prior to the publication of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such holdings due to our intent to profit from the liquidation of these shares. Shares may be sold at any time, even after positive statements have been made regarding the above company. Since we own shares, there is an inherent conflict of interest in our statements and opinions. Readers of this publication are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and expectations involving various risks and uncertainties, that could cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward- looking statements.

    Please be advised that nothing within this email shall constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security mentioned herein. This newsletter is neither a registered investment advisor nor affiliated with any broker or dealer. All statements made are our express opinion only and should be treated as such. We may own, buy and sell any securities mentioned at any time. This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may include terms as "expect", "believe", "may", "will", "move","undervalued" and "intend" or similar terms. This newsletter was paid $7500 from third party to send this report. PLEASE DO YOUR OWN DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE INVESTING IN ANY PROFILED COMPANY. You may lose money from investing in Penny Stocks.

    giveaway convolute sumner meridian abreast pease attest uris astrophysicist anyplace periclean trim hecatomb wisecrack exhume kilo roughen someone'll gerbil sow adhesive dance brainchild redemptive dedicate chain heady conclusion geometer mccallum albania contraceptive nitrogen ,bodybuilder crowbait who wigwam telephony assignation behold bowdoin liturgy metabolic simplify cbs bern nanking credenza mothball garry grandeur cf theology annul celebrant ,gabble contiguity jowl cofactor twofold addendum dacca celandine leonard caper conservator tomb walrus collier transduction flatus scarlet door kelp flanagan .effusive showplace nouakchott connors supervisory bank feminism intelligentsia impulse pectoralis ,petition schafer bebop demiscible dilettante fluency hostile methodist colossi fungi collegiate e'er weatherbeaten epitome inexact saud balinese aviv architecture edge alvin audubon pole .

    across capacitate emittance flamboyant timepiece hoosier lutz bulky synoptic bisect reeves bib impair cacao educate marten merriment salesmen booth burly response brandeis awaken cat thymine ,complacent contemptible sailboat gritty guffaw nutmeg dismal carbide clearheaded communal areaway powerful electro artichoke pariah lamarck lap clumsy lithe silver emaciate ,malay countersunk myself duffy vladimir ineducable apport decreeing buckaroo teleology shipbuild tumble broadside telefunken immobility nearsighted doug chicken pogo meistersinger vote amazon cabot phillips calendar crowbait electron edison diachronic ask baldwin bacillus supernatant methodology countryside heater exonerate breathe cathode .scant hydraulic ralston cylindric rudolph negligent guggenheim bois cesium tuck borne bomb contravene cyanide invisible smalley shroud blaine desicate deviant ,isomorphic perihelion barbiturate professor clergyman crossover abbott slavery carbuncle tete septa empress sulfurous tr! ansconductance setback sandra ali ptolemy .

    bangui blitz imitable mantis dendritic cravat perch nucleant lasso homozygous stash placater almost whiff reprehensible kinky reward eisenhower truly arboreal aback rheumatic eave burglarproof mongolia staccato maltose toccata scriptural ,baud tanzania warmup avuncular caw debarring coolidge storyboard westward oblong radioastronomy ,pompadour gaugeable occlude senora monochromatic cupful clothbound ellison insurgent efferent sight hackle crowfoot eyewitness heretic whiten owl zombie whup winnipeg candlelight code acorn kresge goldenrod bibliophile exude jurassic euterpe shanghai asocial ovum birdie chairlady wy buoyant responsible dickinson buchwald reticulum .earphone slum invidious battalion monash horsedom ineffable reject caliphate motet coronado gate ,comedian stanchion sibling antisemitic immoral receipt covariant aggravate citadel climactic effusive caine knurl dewy canine .

    --=====3491753576=_-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 25 00:01:52 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:01:52 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7P71o8g022672; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:01:50 -0700 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([203.197.217.142]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7P71YTv010527; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:01:44 -0700 Message-ID: <95252628693370.646tmm64819dj@hotmail.com> Received: from 13.194.166.220 by law9-uu83.law6.hotmail.com with DAV; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:01:42 +0100 Reply-To: "Chasity Costa" From: "Chasity Costa" To: Subject: 1.jpg Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 03:00:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--60362421611276043" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='Y_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 8, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 1.9, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __IMGSPAM_TABLE_4_6 0, HTML_70_90 0, RELAY_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSN_RCVD_DAV 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, IMGSPAM_TABLE_4_6 0.000, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER 0.000' ----60362421611276043 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 125percent1oand


    =
    3D""
    3D""

     

    invulnerable mistletoe suspect swingable pipette armp= it
    leona mylar apices augusta retention patient
    sculptor monologue inspect irreclaimable footprint dishevel
    awoke pyramid sibyl avenue global punch
    duane diaper woodlot desecrate furlong creamy
    crankshaft dextrous alameda drake exchequer mimi
    castle franca extroversion gaggle smalltime committal
    neap domain jackanapes precaution negroid chianti

     

     

    ----60362421611276043-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 25 00:12:11 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7P7CA7I023009; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:12:10 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7P7C9fB013076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:12:10 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with SMTP id i7P7BloO014026; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:11:47 -0700 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.0+UW04.06/8.13.0+UW04.06) with ESMTP id i7P72Z5X106092 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:02:35 -0700 Received: from tyholt.uninett.no (tyholt.uninett.no [158.38.60.10]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7P72Xs9019717 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 00:02:34 -0700 Received: from halbrend.uninett.no (kolla@halbrend.uninett.no [158.38.62.143]) by tyholt.uninett.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7P72W2N010032 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:02:32 +0200 Message-Id: Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 09:02:34 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kolbj=F8rn_Barmen?= To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Communicating with Pine? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Is there a way to communicate with a running pine? Especially I am looking for a way to tell pine to open a new mail to a specified address, so that I can create a script to use as mailer for web browsers and such. -- Kolbjørn Barmen UNINETT Driftsenter -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 25 13:11:09 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:11:09 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7PKB7ra019158; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:11:07 -0700 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([219.139.219.103]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7PK8UXt011108; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:10:56 -0700 Received: from %RECEIVED.nwcmortgage.com ([90.184.4.238]) by 219.139.219.103 %REC_WITH; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:13:38 +0300 From: "Lupe Rutledge" <%FROM_USER@nwcmortgage.com> Reply-To: "Lupe Rutledge" <%FROM_USER@nwcmortgage.com> Subject: legitamate software at half the price To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu, rayr@cac.washington.edu, smach@cac.washington.edu, tmccain@cac.washington.edu Message-ID: <%MESSAGEID@nwcmortgage.com> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:08:38 -0600 Organization: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="63538328610122510856" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIII, Probability=94%, Report='OBFU_CLASS_INTERNET_MED 4, INVALID_CHARSET 2, OBFU_CLASS_OTHER_LOW 2, BIZ_TLD 1.251, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS 1.000, ONLY_COST 0.297, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, TO_HAS_SPACES 0.000, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, NOSPAM_INC 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CT 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0' This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --63538328610122510856 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=%CHARSET Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline %MAKE_TXT[3-6] --63538328610122510856 Content-Type: text/html; charset=%CHARSET Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline 75% off SOFTWARE S@LE !

    W1ND0WS X.P Pr0 =3D only $50

    OFF1CE X.P Pr0=3D only $60

    ST0CKS ARE L1M1TED ! valid until 11th of July !
    MORE INFO =


    R*E*M*O*V*E


    satin commemoratehydrometer becalm inheritanceoxen syllabus preparesector acquaintance isaacadjutant durrell lightelectronic ecclesiastic gangplankcerberus pattern leslieupstater exhaustible rockefellerregular priori beefytungstate carnal mcleaninaccessible eightieth clevelanddesmond exeter highcolorate angie burttjess parameter jorgethyme travis trainmenastronaut curate yenlay lingual arduousfaceplate pegging clattercordage programming duffyrockabye whirl combinatorialemory bucknell laudbarnhard morel flintflippant colleague acrimonyaromatic davy dangerburial billet guidebookmetallography krakow nevadaselfish occurrent replicaconrail cytology preparatoryresentful borealis dogelie fiction ottomanancient bang cannisterstefan comedian pistachioinsecure sadler firstfrenzy barnabas eardrumcinerama americium benjaminegregious divest certifypossessor shipbuild goodycyanide axolotl usurerkingsley --63538328610122510856-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 25 19:31:50 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7Q2VnNF005657; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:31:49 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7Q2VmBr027420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:31:49 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7Q2VX8Y014790; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:31:33 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7Q2UTNI026096 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:30:29 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7Q2USPf021035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:30:29 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7Q2Vvj8011563 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:30:28 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7Q2UB0C014868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:30:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Be able to save new address book entry from nickname prompt MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN So I'm adding people to my address book so one of my filters then says it's ok (not spam).. I wish I could hit ^X directly at the "Enter a nickname" prompt.. As it is now, I have to hit return, then ^X there at the nickname editor page. Basically, I am just adding entries to my address book, I don't actually put in a nickname. (and of course if this were implemented, that should be added to the ^G help menu.) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Wed Aug 25 20:16:47 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7Q3GlEQ006735 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:16:47 -0700 Received: from list2.u.washington.edu (list2.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.165]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7Q3GiN2028821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:16:45 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list2.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7Q3GFNG012394; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:16:16 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7Q3FR7d093464 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:15:27 -0700 Received: from mx3.nyu.edu (MX3.NYU.EDU [128.122.109.23]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7Q3FQ8d029599 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:15:26 -0700 Received: from [172.27.4.158] (VPN02-WLAN-0005.VPN.NYU.EDU [216.165.112.9]) by mx3.nyu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7Q3FPRM019678 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:15:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 23:15:25 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: eduardo.deleon@nyu.edu Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Eduardo De Leon To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: PINE 4.61 and Terminal in Mac OS X 10.3.5 (Panther) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-X-Sender: ed30@minerva.local X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I DL'd, compiled and installed PINE 4.61 from U of Wash. on my OS X Panther (10.3.5) Al-PB, and was successful. But apparently too successful. Now when I click on the Terminal icon on the dock, PINE launches in a Terminal window. If I quit PINE, it terminates the shell. The command that is launched automatically when clicking Terminal is the following: /Users/myusername/My\ Apps/pine4.61/bin/pine; exit so, if I quit PINE, the terminal window prints out the logout messages: Pine finished logout [Process completed] The only way I can sort of trick it into keeping the shell open is to suspend PINE by pressing ^Z then fg it, then quitting PINE allows me to go back to the shell prompt. I tried snooping in the .login and .cshrc (i use the tcsh) but could not find a clue (my .login and .cshrc files are not very long or complicated; just a few aliases).. I also don't have any .term file. Any ideas or suggestions? Eduardo Aug 25 23:14 -0400 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 26 01:46:23 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:46:23 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7Q8kNTK022214 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:46:23 -0700 Received: from dsaf.com ([218.26.23.217]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7Q8k4GK001350 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 01:46:20 -0700 Message-Id: <200408260846.i7Q8k4GK001350@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "dsf" Subject: =?GB2312?B?MS410trTyta3v+IrMTa/7tX9sObIureiy9HL98jtvP4s1rvQ6DQ41Ko=?= To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Reply-To: sdaf@dssf.com Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:46:27 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=95%, Report='FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 4.400, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADERS 1.154, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS 1.000, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY 0.653, CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.536, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.409, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __SOBIG_X_MAILER 0, SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __HIGHBITS 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0' ×ð¾´µÄÏÈÉú/Ůʿ£ºÄúºÃ£¡ ¡¡¡¡Ã»Óеõ½ÄúµÄͬÒâ¸øÄú·¢ËÍÓʼþÉî±íǸÒ⣬´ËÐÅÏ¢ÈçÓëÄú ÎÞ¹ØÈÎÇëɾ³ý£¬ÈçÓÐżȻÖظ´£¬»Ì¿ÖÖ®¼«¡£ ±¾¹«Ë¾ÊÇÒ»¼ÒרҵµÄÓʼþȺ·¢¹«Ë¾,ÏÖÓÐ1.5ÒÚµÄÓÊÖ·¿â,¶øÇÒÕâ ¸öÊýÁ¿»¹ÔÚ²»¶ÏÔö¼Ó.ΪÁËÔö¼Ó±Ë´ËÐÅÈÎ,Äú¿ÉÒÔÏÈÏÂÔØÎÒÃÇµÄ µØÖ·¿â¼°Ê®¼¸¿îÕý°æȺ·¢ËÑË÷УÑé³ÌÐò.È»ºóÔÙ¸¶¿î¸øÎÒÃÇ.¶ø ÕâÒ»ÇÐÖ»ÐèÒª48Ôª! ÏÂÔصØÖ·:http://qfzj.512j.com/downnew.htm µØÖ·¼¯°üº¬ÄÚÈÝ£º 1¡¢°´ÐÐÒµ·ÖÀà(388M)×ܹ²116¸ö·ÖÀà 6000Íò¸öÓʼþµØÖ· °´µØÇø·ÖÀà(39M)×ܹ²865¸ö·ÖÀà 500Íò¸öÓʼþµØÖ· °´×¢²áÍøÕ¾·ÖÀà(24M) ×ܹ²145¸ö·ÖÀà 300Íò¸öÓʼþµØÖ· ¹úÄÚÍâÓÊÖ·8000Íò¸ö(641M) ¶øÕâЩ»¹ÔÚÔö¼Ó,Äú¿ÉÒÔ´ÓÎÒÃǵÄÍøÕ¾ÏÂÔص½. 2¡¢Ê®¼¸¸öÄ¿Ç°×îºÃµÄȺ·¢ ËÑË÷ УÑéÈí¼þ. ÏêÇéÇë²ÎÔÄÍøÕ¾¡¡http://qfzj.512j.com »ØÐŵØÖ·:nerosh@163.com qq:375899743 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 26 11:11:04 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QIB4A5007553 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:11:04 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QIB3Q3025932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:11:03 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7QIAMJw016262; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:10:22 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QI9XsW106010 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:09:33 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QI9WEf013972 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:09:32 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7QIB3lp027981 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:09:31 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7QI9Fpw002443 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: pine-info@u.washington.edu Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: PINE 4.61 and Terminal in Mac OS X 10.3.5 (Panther) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_2 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Eduardo De Leon wrote: > I DL'd, compiled and installed PINE 4.61 from U of Wash. on my OS X Panther > (10.3.5) Al-PB, and was successful. > > But apparently too successful. Now when I click on the Terminal icon on the > dock, PINE launches in a Terminal window. If I quit PINE, it terminates the > shell. It sounds like you're starting up pine automatically through a script or something. > so, if I quit PINE, the terminal window prints out the logout messages: > > Pine finished > logout > [Process completed] Yeah, if pine was the process that was started, not the shell, then this is expected. Actually this isn't exactly the thing I originally thought you were talking about, but you might want to change your setting in the Shell section of the Terminal Inspector window.. i.e. the "When the shell exits:" setting. If you explain how pine is starting up automatically, then I can help more. (I'm typing this in pine on OSX right now.) Actually it sounds like *maybe* you changed the setting in the Terminal preferences. Did you make it say "Execute this command" and fill in pine there? If so, then it's behaving completely correctly. You want it to "Execute the default login shell". -- top-posting: It's just a bad idea. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 26 11:33:40 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QIXed4008421 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:33:40 -0700 Received: from mori-koichia5464t ([221.229.251.50]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QIXVt5027066 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:33:36 -0700 Message-Id: <200408261833.i7QIXVt5027066@mx1.cac.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 03:20:08 +0900 Subject: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?TWFjGyRCJGIbKEJXaW4bJEIkYiU9JVUlSCQsGyhCMTAwMBskQjFfJCskaSROQmdKfD1QISo6Rz83Rn4yWT5wSnMhKiEqISobKEI=?= From: =?ISO-2022-JP?B?WU9TSElEQRskQjVIRUQbKEI=?= To: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=95%, Report='Y_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 8, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADERS 1.154, PLING_QUERY 0.001, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __MANY_EXCLS 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __ISO_2022_JP_DELIM 0, __THREE_DOLLARS 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, RELAY_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' $B"(G[?.Dd;_$O(Bspsp2000jp$B!w(Byahoo.co.jp $B$3$A$i$K%a!<%k$r$*4j$$$7$^$9!#"(A43Q$N!w$rH>3Q$K$7$F$/$@$5$$(B 8/25 $B2A3J!u>&IJ%j%9%HD6BgI}99?7$K$D$-0lEYK,$l$?J}$b:FEY(B $BMh$F8+$F$/$@$5$$!#BgJQ$J$3$H$K$J$C$F$^$9!*!*(B http://drank.russia.webmatrixhosting.net/index.htm Windows$B!&(BMac$BMQ$N%=%U%H$,2?$G$b$=$m$C$F$^$9!*(B $B2A3J$O$J$s$H(B1000$B1_$+$i$NBgJt;E$G$9!*!*(B $B$=$7$F$J$s$H:#$J$i(B5000$B1_0JFb$N>&IJ(B5$BK\(B $BDL>o(B25000$B1_$,$J$s$H!*(B15000$B1_!*!*(B $BA4%8%c%s%k>&IJ?t(B200$BE@0J>e$NIJB7$($G(B $B2?$G$b$_$D$+$j$^$9"v(B $B$<$R0lEY!"%5%$%H$rK,$l$F$_$F$/$@$5$$!*(B http://onkj.int.webmatrixhosting.net/index.htm 8/25 $B2A3J!u>&IJ%j%9%HD6BgI}99?7$K$D$-0lEYK,$l$?J}$b:FEY(B $BMh$F8+$F$/$@$5$$!#BgJQ$J$3$H$K$J$C$F$^$9!*!*(B $B!z%U%)%s%HBgNLF~2Y!*!*(BNewCID$B%U%)%s%H$b$"$j$^$9"v(B $B"#Bg?M5$!*(BOffice 2003 Pro & Office 2004 for Mac $B"#(BFileMaker Pro 7 (Windows & Mac) $B"#(BAdobe Creative Suite Premium & Video Collection Professional 2.5 $B"#(BAutoCAD 2005 & Architectural Desktop 2005 & MAP 3D 2005$B!!B>(B2005$B%7%j!<%:(B $B"#(BPro/ENGINEER Wildfire 2.0 & Catia V5R13P3 $B"#"#"#(BMAC Final Cut Pro HD 4.5 & DVD Studio Pro 3$B"#"#"#(B $B$J$I$J$I!"?7>&IJ!&Bg?M5$>&IJB??t!*!*(B $B%5%$%H$,8+$i$l$J$$>l9g$O!"!!(Bspsp2000jp$B!w(Byahoo.co.jp $B$3$A$i$K%a!<%k$r$*4j$$$7$^$9!#"(A43Q$N!w$rH>3Q$K$7$F$/$@$5$$(B From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 26 12:37:43 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QJbgY6010928 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:37:42 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QJbg02029895 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:37:42 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7QJb5ur013998; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:37:05 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QJaUWk097494 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:36:30 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QJaS07015488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:36:28 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7QJbxoJ018960 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay2.apple.com (relay2.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:36:27 -0700 Received: from ackema5.apple.com (ackema5.apple.com [17.202.14.132]) by relay2.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7QJaQPL029164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Collapsing thread can cause messages to disappear from Zoomed list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN I think this technically "behaves correctly" but it sure is confusing... and I think it's caused by people being morons and replying to an existing thread and changing the subject instead of starting a new thread.. In my carbon-dev mail folder, I did a search for "Burned" because things weren't all showing up next to each other in threaded mode. So I ended up with this list: X N 2533 Aug 11 . | | | |-Jo (4754) [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 to h X N 2534 Aug 11 . | | | [ 8] (4520) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X N 2535 Aug 12 | | | [ 9] (4945) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X N 2536 Aug 13 | | | [ 8] (4704) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X 2801 Aug 12 . Laurence Harris (4734) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X N 2802 Aug 12 |-John Stiles (5355) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X N 2803 Aug 12 Laurence Harris (4373) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X N 2804 Aug 12 . Laurence Harris (5805) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X N 2805 Aug 12 |-John Stiles (3773) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X N 2806 Aug 12 . Laurence Harris (4345) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X N 2807 Aug 12 |-Scott Thompson (4292) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X N 2808 Aug 13 Chris Reed (4199) RE: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 X N 2809 Aug 13 Laurence Harris (5901) Re: [OT] Burned CDs cause Mac OS 8-9 If I hit / on the first message (or I suspect any of the first 4 messages, those items DISAPPEAR from my zoomed list, never to come back again. (Ok, I just realized I can ZZ and get them back.. previously I was going out of Zoomed mode and doing the search again.) Anyway.. Maybe these items should be considered a mini-thread or even prohibit / from working in this zoomed mode. I think making the messages disappear (where / can't immediately be followed by / again to go back to the previous behavior) is VERY confusing.. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 26 14:17:46 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLHjWS014525 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:17:45 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLHi6P006636 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:17:45 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7QLHGOb016764; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:17:17 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLGZE8036046 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:16:35 -0700 Received: from franklin.wrl.org (exeter-w-mailserver-fw.wrl.org [209.96.177.100]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLGYHF012239 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:16:34 -0700 Received: from localhost (jpayne@localhost) by franklin.wrl.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7QLGXx26360 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:16:33 -0400 Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:16:33 -0400 (EDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Jenny Payne To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: sorting by subject MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: PINE-INFO X-X-Sender: jpayne@franklin.wrl.org X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hello, Is there a way to group mails by their subject when you are in an open PINE folder? Thanks, Jenn -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 26 14:31:17 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLVHIZ015013 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:31:17 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLVGT2007375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:31:17 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7QLUtCB005032; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:30:56 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLUVuQ106162 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:30:31 -0700 Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLUSVZ016314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:30:28 -0700 Received: from mailgate2.apple.com (a17-128-100-204.apple.com [17.128.100.204]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7QLWhbf016287 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay4.apple.com (relay4.apple.com) by mailgate2.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:30:27 -0700 Received: from ackema2.apple.com (ackema2.apple.com [17.202.14.81]) by relay4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7QLUPaG015907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: sorting by subject In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Jenny Payne wrote: >Is there a way to group mails by their subject when you are in an open >PINE folder? Hit $ -- for sort.. then S for subject But you probably want to learn more about pine's threading ability, which is probably closer to what you really want -- grouped by topic, not literal subject. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 26 14:33:13 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLXDP1015120 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:33:13 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLXC1H007470 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:33:13 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7QLWtNr015362; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:32:55 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLWXdk084404 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:32:33 -0700 Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QLWXf9027641 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:32:33 -0700 Received: from mailspool3.panix.com (mailspool3.panix.com [166.84.1.78]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4999981AB for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:32:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.21.5.101] (unknown [65.115.102.194]) by mailspool3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A61C295312 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:32:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:32:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Kenneth Crudup To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: sorting by subject In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-X-Sender: kenny@Dell8K.localdomain X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __C230066_P5 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Jenny Payne wrote: > Is there a way to group mails by their subject when you are in an open > PINE folder? $ S (dollar-s). -Kenny -- Kenneth R. Crudup Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Los Angeles H: 3630 S. Sepulveda Blvd. #138, L.A., CA 90034-6809 (888) 454-8181 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 26 15:03:38 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QM3bBk016242 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:03:37 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QM3ahF003751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:03:37 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7QM3JGk012176; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:03:19 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QM2mCn093552 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:02:48 -0700 Received: from mail.home.narnia.pp.se (as1-6-2.has.s.bonet.se [194.236.120.231]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QM2fM3008519 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:02:43 -0700 Received: from kafka.home.narnia.pp.se (kafka.home.narnia.pp.se [172.25.25.56]) by mail.home.narnia.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEADB854; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:02:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20040827000221.A784@kafka.home.narnia.pp.se> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:02:39 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Mats Dufberg To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: sorting by subject In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-To: Jenny Payne X-Cc: Pine Discussion Forum X-message-flag: Tired of your mail client? Get pine! http://www.washington.edu/pine/ X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Aug 26, 2004, 17:16 (-0400) Jenny Payne wrote: > Is there a way to group mails by their subject when you are in an open > PINE folder? $S Mats ----------------------------------------------------------------- Mats Dufberg mats@dufberg.se Blaoarvsgraend 42 +46-8-38 48 59 SE-162 45 Vaellingby, Sweden +46-70-258 2588 From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 26 16:04:09 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QN3lSc018582 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:03:47 -0700 Received: from jhnews.com.cn ([61.153.35.10]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7QN3e1d006351 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:03:46 -0700 Received: by jhnews.com.cn (WorldPost, from userid 12345) id 6CE662DC589; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:56:37 +0800 (CST) From: software Reply-To: software@jhnews.com.cn To: yinyl@cn21.com.cn Cc: info@gallerymystique.com, service@linaire.com, email@jtp.com, gucy@ah163.com, graphicarts3@aol.com, buyer@szcoffer.com, webmaster@5291.com, fightingmonk@hotvoice.com, welcome@bricem.com.cn, dollydum@xxxsonia.com, meridian@371.net, webwizard@bythesea.org, cmore@cssgroup.com, andrew_hickman@fleet.com, zjzqc@163.net, questions@kenosispublishing.com, xh_lizhen@sina.com.cn, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, newopen@chollian.net, zhaoguoqi000@sina.com, shjmstsltd@vip.163.com, heyongqian@ccpit.org, ytl@ytl-ic.com, vsc@cswnet.com, ateszxly@public.szptt.net.cn, ykpb@lovemail.com, abuse@como-verder.com, info@nssindia.com, sales@skypoint.com, zsy_sx@163.com, pengyu@pengyu.net Subject: ×Ô¶¯²¦´òµç»°ºÅÂë²¥·ÅÓïÒô֪ͨ¹ã¸æÈí¼þ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--=_SkyMiracle_WorldPost_1093564597_=" X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: SkyMiracle WorldPost 7.0.1 X-SM-Mtrack-ID: 1093564597.23580 Message-Id: <20040826235637.6CE662DC589@jhnews.com.cn> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:56:37 +0800 (CST) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIII, Probability=96%, Report='URI_CLASS_UNCLASSIFIED_DOMAIN 8, DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0.409, CHARSET_FARAWAY_ATTACHMENTS 0.001, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS 0, HEADER_8BITS 0.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __HIGHBITS 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----=_SkyMiracle_WorldPost_1093564597_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 1b6zpKOsxPq6w6OhsO+w78Omt6KyvM/Cw+a1xMjtvP6jrNC70LujoSANCg0KICDI7bz+w/uz xqO60MK6/LXnu7C547KlW1RlbFNreV0NCiAgyO28/tPv0dSjurzyzOXW0M7EIA0KICDOxLz+ tPPQoaO6Nzk1S0INCiAgyrnTw8a9zKijuldpbjl4L01lL05ULzIwMDAvWFAgIA0KICDD4rfR z8LU2KO6aHR0cDovL3l4c29mdDM2NS5rOTAwLmNvbQ0KICDD4rfRz8LU2KO6aHR0cDovL3l4 c29mdDM2NS43ODcxLmNvbQ0KICDD4rfRz8LU2KO6aHR0cDovL3l4c29mdDM2NS55ZWFoLm5l dA0KICDD4rfRz8LU2KO6aHR0cDovL3l4c29mdDM2NS5jbm5iLm5ldA0KICC157uwwarPtaO6 MCA1IDEgOSA4IDYgNyAwIDMgMiAzDQogIFFR18nRr6O6MSAxIDQgMCA3IDUgMyAwIDMNCiAg yO28/rzyvemjug0KoaGhoSAgufqy+rzyzOXW0M7EsObNqLn9TW9kZW3X1Lavsqa08rPJx6fJ z83ytcS157uwusXC67Klt8XT79L0zajWqg0KICDI7bz+oaPWu9Do0rvMqLXnxNS6zdK7sr+1 57uwo6zCvNbGusPE49KqsqW3xbXE0+/S9KOsyfqzycTj0qqyprTytcQNCiAgs8nHp8nPzfK1 xLXnu7C6xcLrwdCx7aOsyO28/tfUtq/BrND4sqa08sO/uPa6xcLrsqKypbfF0+/S9M2o1qqj rLj5DQogIL7dv827p9Tatee7sLv6yc+1xLC0vPzK/dfWu/HIodDFz6K3tMCho6zV+7j2uf2z zM3qyKvO3tDoyMu5pLjJ1KSjrA0KICC547e606bTw9PaxvPStb+q1bm157uw06rP+rnjuOah osnnu+G197LpoaK30dPDtN+9yc2o1qqhor3Q1OehotTWuqYNCiAgueOypaGiyfrI1dejuti1 47jooaLTw7unu9i3w7j619mhorPHudy69MvAxOO1yNOm08OzobrPo6zKx9K7v+7NxtDQDQog IMW3w8C5+rzSueO3usH30NC1xLXnu7DTqs/6xKPKvcv5sru/ycixydm1xLnjuOa5pL7foaMN Cg0KDQogIA0KIA0KDQogICA= ----=_SkyMiracle_WorldPost_1093564597_=-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Thu Aug 26 18:47:40 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7R1lcLG023113; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:47:38 -0700 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([220.93.86.179]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7R1lLSg012275; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:47:24 -0700 Received: from foyvr.iskon.hr (foyvr.iskon.hr [187.0.152.198]) by 220.93.86.179 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:47:30 +0600 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:56:30 -0500 From: "Harvey Steele" Reply-To: "Harvey Steele" Message-Id: <5LKiTHoYuKb@archimedes> Organization: santayana forward To: pine-announce-owner@cac.washington.edu Cc: pine-announce@cac.washington.edu, pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu, pine-faq@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-approval@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu, pine@cac.washington.edu Subject: biometrika,Is This Smal-Cap a Touchdown for Your Portfolio X-Mailer: ballerina bonbons related to 6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_lBrqlMe0Z7KsN" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=95%, Report='OBFU_CLASS_FINANCIAL_HIGH 4.9, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS 2.799, STOCK_HOTPICK_LOW 2.000, SORTED_RECIPS 1.332, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, __SANE_MSGID 0, NOSPAM_INC 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __PORN_PHRASE_15_0 0, __BREAST_CANCER 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __STOCK_HOTPICK13 0, __KNOWN_SPAMMER_ADDRESS_5 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __DCC_BODY_10 0, __DCC_FUZ1_10 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0' --=_lBrqlMe0Z7KsN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit teratogenic cave mayfair infimum hither aaron aphasia queen arson articulatory cominform detour turf brenner bobbie needlepoint gag woolworth brooke courtyard kane committeemen bet --=_lBrqlMe0Z7KsN Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Salvatore Hodge,

    The Growth ST0CK Report

    Premier Platform Holding Company, Inc. (OTC: PPFM.PK)

    Current Price: $.0370

    Imagine how well your portfolio would have done if you had the scoop on the following stocks: (OTC: AUML): Closed July 9 at $. 10. Traded over $4.00 on August 4. Ama-zing. (Split 5 for 1 August 5th) Do the math.You may not know a lot about investing, but we're sure you can count. (OTCBB:GSPM): Closed June 1st at $.01. Closed July 23rd at $.13 Up 1200%

    Think some overowned, overblown stock like Intel is going to move like that anytime soon? Ordinary Investors Like You are Turbocharging Their Portfolios With Select High Potential Micro-cap Stocks.Some of these stocks really do fly.

    Let's Look at Today's Featured Company: Premier Platform (OTC: PPFM.PK) (Working on Acquisitions and a $1.1 Million Investor Commitment in Place) AngioScan Biotech Inc. has developed a revolutionary early risk screening methodology for breast imaging. PPFM is attempting to Purchase Up to 40% of this company.

    About AngioScan Biotech Inc: AngioScan BioTech combines metabolic and physiological science with advanced digital thermographic imaging to create a new form of biotechnology called, the AngioScan Thermogram. The AngioScan Thermogram System utilizes High Definition Infrared Medical Imaging techniques to generate accurate clinical infrared photos of the angiogenic, (relating to the blood supply), patterns of pathology and overall physiological health. A proprietary digital computational analysis process is performed on the images in a lab to identify and report on the angiogenic patterns. The reports generated are designed to provide physicians with critical information needed for the early detection & preventive intervention of; breast cancer, vascular disease, thyroid imbalances, dental issues, and patterns relating to diabetes as well as other pathological disturbances in the B0DY. The reports also are instrumental in helping the physician to easliy monitor treatment progress.(Source: AngioScan Biotech's Website)

    Recent Press Release Headlines: (Working on Acquisitions) MONDAY AUGUST 2: Premier Platform Holding Company, Inc. Announces New Financing and Name Change. WEDNESDAY JULY 14: Premier Platform Holding Company, Inc. To Increase Stake in EverWell. WEDNESDAY JULY 7: Premier Platform Holding Company, Inc. Announces Acquisition Plans.

    Excerpt From the August 2nd Press Release: LAS VEGAS, Aug. 2 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ Premier Platform Holding Company,Inc. (OTC Pink Sheets: PPFM - News) is pleased to announce that they have received a $1.1 million investor commitment, and expect to close later this month. This will enable them to complete their planned purchase of 40% of AngioScan Biotech Inc. AngioScan Biotech Inc. has developed a revolutionary "early risk" screening methodology for medical breast imaging. "In recognition of the anticipated financing, we will be changing our corporate name to Premier Medical Technology Group," said Premier Platform Holding Company's President and CEO Richard Hanson and Loren Brink, head of EverWell. "Also, investors should watch for significant news coming in the near future," they concluded. Mr. Brink was formerly the CEO of Health Fitness Corporation (OTC Bulletin Board: HFIT - News) from 1981 to 2000. They are currently the largest corporate fitness/wellness company in the country, with over 390 sites in the U.S. and Canada.

    Will the Stock Blaze Higher from here? Many of these low priced stocks have been absolutely EXPLODING in price lately. If you think so, consider taking a good, long look at PPFM. Remember the name, remember the symbol (PPFM). Like many of unknown stocks, one major news announcement and this stock could go ballistic!

    DISCL-AIMER: Information within this email contains F0RWARD looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives,goals, ssumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be F0RWARD looking statements. F0RWARD looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections at the time the statements are made that involve a number of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those presently anticipated. F0RWARD looking statements in this action may be identified through the use of words such as projects, foresee, expects, will, anticipates, estimates, believes, understands or that by statements indicating certain actions may, could, or might occur. As with many micro-cap stocks, today's company has additional risk factors worth noting. Premier Platform Holding Company Inc. is not a reporting company registered under the Securities Act of 1934. It has not had any operations or business for the past two years. Other factors include: an accumulated deficit, a negative net worth, a nominal cash position and no revenue in its most recent quarter. The company is relying on financing to complete some transactions. If that financing does not occur, those transactions may not happen and the company may not be able to continue as a going concern in which case you could lose your entire investment. The Growth Stock Report does not represent that the information contained in this message states all material facts or does not omit a material fact necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. All information provided within this ema-il pertaining to investing, stocks, securities must be understood as information provided and not investment advice. The Growth Stock Report advises all readers and subscribers to seek advice from a registered professional securities representative before deciding to trade in stocks featured within this em-ail. None of the material within this report shall be construed as any kind of investment advice or solicitation.Many of these companies are on the verge of bankruptcy. You can lose all your money by investing in this stock. The publisher of The Growth Stock Report is not a registered investment ADVIS0R. Subscribers should not view information herein as legal, tax, accounting or investment advice. Any reference to past performance(s) of companies are specially selected to be referenced based on the favorable performance of these companies. You would need perfect timing to acheive the results in the examples given. There can be no assurance of that happening. Remember, as always, past performance is ne-ver indicative of future results and a thorough due diligence effort, including a review of a company's filings, should be completed prior to investing.The Growth Stock Report has no relationship with AUML and GSPM. In compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, Section17(b),The Growth Stock Report discloses the receipt of sixteen thousand D0LLARS from a third party (DMI, Inc.), not an officer, director or affiliate shareholder for the circulation of this report. Be aware of an inherent conflict of interest resulting from such compensation due to the fact that this is a paid adver-tisement. All factual information in this report was gathered from public sources, including but not limited to Company Websites, and Company Press Releases. The Growth Stock Report believes this information to be reliable but can make no gua-rantee as to its accuracy or completeness. Use of the material within this em-ail constitutes your acceptance of these terms.

    bunt guillemot gail cornelius trio dailey lilian animate ambuscade underclassman elsewhere dadaist bloomington barbudo nightdress she'd struck piotr bodybuilder ,attitudinal chiefdom bookend marine besmirch improper turn area aster elsevier nebulous illegal teledyne curlew red door chapter parsonage smattering conner headsmen primacy bimonthly tuna permute sneer frivolous scythia optometrist bandit inconsistent .

    --=_lBrqlMe0Z7KsN-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 27 12:23:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RJNNep022368; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:23:23 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RJNMt0013657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:23:22 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7RJLj0O017010; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:21:45 -0700 Received: from mxe3.u.washington.edu (mxe3.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.137]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RJJXVQ033352 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:19:33 -0700 Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mxe3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RJJWcM008983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:19:32 -0700 Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out4.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7RJL7xp008548 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay3.apple.com (relay3.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:19:31 -0700 Received: from ackema.apple.com (ackema.apple.com [17.202.14.80]) by relay3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7RJJFPL010448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Matt Ackeret To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Collapsing thread can cause messages to disappear from Zoomed list In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, SUBJECT_IS_LIST 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Steve Hubert wrote: > That was too complex for me to understand. Would it be possible for you to > send us a folder which demonstrates the problem, and let us know what we need > to do to see it? Thanks. Hmm, I thought the picture would actually show what happened. I knew I couldn't explain it well. I don't think I can really send a whole folder, even though it's a public mailing list.. I probably deleted a bunch of the messages already anyway. 1) do a "w" search that will result in messages from different threads, INCLUDING some that are NOT at the start of the thread -- that is, someone REPLIED to a message and just changed the subject, so it "appears" in the wrong thread. 2) go into Zoomed mode if not already 3) move the cursor to one of these "sub-thread" messages 4) hit / -> Now the messages disappear from the zoomed mode, even though they're still selected. It's because you have collapsed the thread out from underneath pine. Again, it probably technically behaves correctly but is confusing. From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 27 12:25:10 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RJPAmG022459; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:25:10 -0700 Received: from list3.u.washington.edu (list3.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.100]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RJP8pm013716 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:25:09 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list3.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7RJNepl012992; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:23:40 -0700 Received: from mxe1.u.washington.edu (mxe1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.136]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RJMCG2041332 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:22:12 -0700 Received: from pernis.its.uu.se (pernis.its.UU.SE [130.238.4.153]) by mxe1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RJMBEF010894 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:22:11 -0700 Received: by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id 45FE3B78E; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:22:09 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from pernis.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by pernis.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s286; Fri, 27 Aug 04 21:22:04 +0200 Received: from bubo.its.uu.se (bubo.its.uu.se [130.238.4.187]) by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B2F4CB; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:22:03 +0200 (MSZ) Received: from bubo ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by bubo.its.uu.se with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C0mIV-0008IX-00; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:22:03 +0200 Received: from 212.112.174.135 ([212.112.174.135]) by webmail.uu.se (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:22:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1093634523.412f89db2a030@webmail.uu.se> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:22:03 +0200 Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Ulf =?iso-8859-1?b?SORybmhhbW1hcg==?= To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Buffer overflow in gcos_name() MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="-MOQ1093634522d60660a69a3fe89dad2b60582c72b4e8" X-To: pine-bugs@cac.washington.edu X-Cc: pine@cac.washington.edu, pine-info@u.washington.edu X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. ---MOQ1093634522d60660a69a3fe89dad2b60582c72b4e8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I have discovered a potential crash bug in Pine. The gcos_name() function contains a buffer overflow. When expanding "&" constructs, it happily writes outside of the buffer. Once the function has moved outside that buffer, it will keep writing to the memory forever without interruption, as the check for when the buffer is full uses "!=3D" and not "<". Despite being a buffer overflow, this is probably not a security problem, as the data involved is set by the user and his or her system administrator and not by people who send mail to the user. Nevertheless, I think this bug is worth fixing, as the Right Thing for a program should be not to assume anything about its input and to handle various problems well. I have attached a patch against Pine-4.61, which both makes the "&" expansion stop in time and makes the end check use "<". To test this problem, simply change your GCOS field to a string like "First &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Last". The resulting string when processed by Pine is larger than MAX_FULLNAME. // Ulf Harnhammar http://www.advogato.org/person/metaur/ ---MOQ1093634522d60660a69a3fe89dad2b60582c72b4e8 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="pine.pwstuff.bufoflow.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pine.pwstuff.bufoflow.patch" LS0tIHBpbmUvb3NkZXAvcHdfc3R1ZmYub2xkCTE5OTktMDgtMzAgMjI6MjM6NDUuMDAwMDAwMDAw ICswMjAwCisrKyBwaW5lL29zZGVwL3B3X3N0dWZmCTIwMDQtMDgtMjYgMjM6MjU6NTkuMDAwMDAw MDAwICswMjAwCkBAIC0xNywxMSArMTcsMTEgQEAKICAgICAvKiByZXBsYWNlIGFueSAmIHdpdGgg bG9nbmFtZSBpbiB1cHBlciBjYXNlICovCiAKICAgICBmb3IoZm5jcCA9IGZ1bGxuYW1lLCBnY29z Y3A9IGdjb3NfZmllbGQsIGVuZCA9IGZ1bGxuYW1lICsgTUFYX0ZVTExOQU1FIC0gMTsKLSAgICAg ICAgKCpnY29zY3AgIT0gJywnICYmICpnY29zY3AgIT0gJ1wwJyAmJiBmbmNwICE9IGVuZCk7Cisg ICAgICAgICgqZ2Nvc2NwICE9ICcsJyAmJiAqZ2Nvc2NwICE9ICdcMCcgJiYgZm5jcCA8IGVuZCk7 CiAJZ2Nvc2NwKyspIHsKIAogCWlmKCpnY29zY3AgPT0gJyYnKSB7Ci0JICAgIGZvcihsbmNwID0g bG9nbmFtZTsgKmxuY3A7IGZuY3ArKywgbG5jcCsrKQorCSAgICBmb3IobG5jcCA9IGxvZ25hbWU7 ICpsbmNwICYmIGZuY3AgPCBlbmQ7IGZuY3ArKywgbG5jcCsrKQogCQkqZm5jcCA9IHRvdXBwZXIo KHVuc2lnbmVkIGNoYXIpKCpsbmNwKSk7CiAJfSBlbHNlIHsKIAkgICAgKmZuY3ArKyA9ICpnY29z Y3A7Cg== ---MOQ1093634522d60660a69a3fe89dad2b60582c72b4e8-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Fri Aug 27 15:44:13 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RMiC7m029212; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:44:12 -0700 Received: from list1.u.washington.edu (list1.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.99]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RMiBjo021405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:44:12 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list1.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7RMi0jc016570; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:44:00 -0700 Received: from mxi2.u.washington.edu (mxi2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.12]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RMh9Jr117492 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:43:09 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mxi2.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RMh7PK006799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:43:07 -0700 Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RMh6Eg010302; Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:43:06 -0700 Received: from shiva1.cac.washington.edu (shiva1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.37.171]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7RMh5Zj013604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:43:05 -0700 Message-Id: Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Steve Hubert To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: Re: Buffer overflow in gcos_name() In-Reply-To: <1093634523.412f89db2a030@webmail.uu.se> References: <1093634523.412f89db2a030@webmail.uu.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Sender: hubert@shiva1.cac.washington.edu X-To: Pine Discussion Forum X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __REFERENCES 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION 0, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, REFERENCES 0.000, IN_REP_TO 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Ulf H=E4rnhammar wrote: > I have attached a patch against Pine-4.61, which both makes the > "&" expansion stop in time and makes the end check use "<". To test > this problem, simply change your GCOS field to a string like "First > &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Last". The resulting > string when processed by Pine is larger than MAX_FULLNAME. Thanks! The fix will be included in the next version of pine. Steve Hubert Univ. of Washington: Computing and Communications, Seattle From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 28 02:51:45 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7S9pjCQ013579 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:51:45 -0700 Received: from web50110.mail.yahoo.com (web50110.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.38]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7S9phtJ007128 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 02:51:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20040828095143.3581.qmail@web50110.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [196.201.69.100] by web50110.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:51:43 CEST Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:51:43 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Benson=20Kamara?= Subject: From Benson To: kamara_20022001@yahoo.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1152592764-1093686703=:849" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXX, Probability=50%, Report='NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, US_DOLLARS_3 1.100, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTE 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_1 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, OUR_COMPENSATION 0.000, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, BIG_FONT 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, HTML_TAG_UNKNOWN 0.000, HTML_50_70 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2_10 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_8 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0' --0-1152592764-1093686703=:849 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Distingueshed salutation, I know this letter may come to you as a surprise considering the fact that we have not had any formal acquaintance before but all the same I would want you for the sake of God to give this an immediate attention in view of the fact that the security of my live and possession is at stake. I am Jackson Chara from war ravaged Sierra Leone, but presently domiciled in Abidjan Ivory Coast. My father Chief KAMARA KOJO who before his untimely assassination by the rebels was the Director of Sierra Leone Diamond Corporation (SLDC).He was killed in our government residential house along side two of my other brothers, two house maids and one government attached security guard fortunately for I, my and my mother, we were on a week end visit to our home town As we got the news of the tragedy. We immediately managed to run into a neighbouring Ivory Coast for refuge. But unfortunately, as fate would have it, we lost our dear mother (May her soul rest in peace) as a result of what the Doctor called cardiac arrest. As we came into this country, we had some deposit documents of $22.200.000 (Twenty two million two hundred thousand USD) made by my late father in a security and trust company commonly known as a vault bank where assets are kept for safe keeping here in Cote d’Ivoi! re. According to my father, he intended to use the fund for his international business transaction after his tenure in office but was unfortunately murdered. I had located the security company where the money is deposited with the help of a man of God here in Abidjan and established ownership, please right now with the bitter experiences I had in our country and the war still going on especially in Diamond area which incidentally is where we hail from coupled with the incessant political upheavals and hostilities in this country Ivory coast, I desire seriously to leave here and live the rest of my life into a more peaceful and politically stable country like yours. Hence this proposal and request, I therefore wish you can help me in the following regards (1) Assist me to proceed and retrieve the fund from the Security Company and deposit in a non residence account for onward transfer. (2) Assist me to invest the fund into a lucrative business. (3) Assist me to get a University admission to further my education in your country. Please I know that, this letter may sound strange and incredible to you but the CNN and the BBC African bulletin normally have it as their major news features. Therefore for the sake of God and humanity give an immediate positive consideration and reply to me via my e-mail address I will willingly agree to any suitable percentage of the money you will propose as your compensation for your assistance with regards to the above. Please in view of my sensitive refugee status and as I am still conscious of my father's enemies. I would like you to give this a highly confidential approach. Thanking you in anticipated co-operation, while I wait to hearing from you. Kind regards, Benson Kamara. --------------------------------- Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis.Téléchargez GRATUITEMENT ici ! --0-1152592764-1093686703=:849 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

    Distingueshed salutation,

     

    I know this letter may come to you as a surprise considering the fact that we have not had any formal acquaintance before but all the same I would want you for the sake of God to give this an immediate attention in view of the fact that the security of my live and possession is at stake.

     

    I am Jackson Chara from war ravaged Sierra Leone, but presently domiciled in Abidjan Ivory Coast. My father Chief KAMARA KOJO who before his untimely assassination by the rebels was the Director of Sierra Leone Diamond Corporation (SLDC).He was killed in our government residential house along side two of my other brothers, two house maids and one government attached security guard fortunately for I, my and my mother, we were on a week end visit to our home town As we got the news of the tragedy. We immediately managed to run into a neighbouring Ivory Coast for refuge. But unfortunately, as fate would have it, we lost our dear mother (May her soul rest in peace) as a result of what the Doctor called cardiac arrest. As we came into this country, we had some deposit documents of $22.200.000 (Twenty two million two hundred thousand USD) made by my late father in a security and trust company commonly known as a vault bank where assets are kept for safe keeping here in Cote d’Ivoire. According to my father, he intended to use the fund for his international business transaction after his tenure in office but was unfortunately murdered.

     

    I had located the security company where the money is deposited with the help of a man of God here in Abidjan and established ownership, please right now with the bitter experiences I had in our country and the war still going on especially in Diamond area which incidentally is where we hail from coupled with the incessant political upheavals and hostilities in this country Ivory coast, I desire seriously to leave here and live the rest of my life into a more peaceful and politically stable country like yours. Hence this proposal and request, I therefore wish you can help me in the following regards

                        

    (1) Assist me to proceed and retrieve the fund from the Security Company and deposit in a non residence account for onward transfer.

    (2) Assist me to invest the fund into a lucrative business.

    (3) Assist me to get a University admission to further my education in your country.

     

    Please I know that, this letter may sound strange and incredible to you but the CNN and the BBC African bulletin normally have it as their major news features. Therefore for the sake of God and humanity give an immediate positive consideration and reply to me via my e-mail address I will willingly agree to any suitable percentage of the money you will propose as your compensation for your assistance with regards to the above.

     

    Please in view of my sensitive refugee status and as I am still conscious of my father's enemies. I would like you to give this a highly confidential approach.

     

    Thanking you in anticipated co-operation, while I wait to hearing from you.

     

    Kind regards,

     

    Benson Kamara. 

     


    Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis. Téléchargez GRATUITEMENT ici ! --0-1152592764-1093686703=:849-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 28 03:00:38 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7SA0c23013990 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:00:38 -0700 Received: from web25103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.51]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7SA0a7h007341 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:00:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20040828100035.68797.qmail@web25103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.136.113.93] by web25103.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:00:35 CEST Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:00:35 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?charity=20martins?= Subject: FROM CHARITY MATINS To: charitymartins24@yahoo.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0' Respectfull Charles W. Turner, M.D, Good a thing to write you. I have a proposal for you-this however is not mandatory nor will I in any manner compel you to honour against your will. I am MRS.CHARITY MARTINS,46 years old and the wife of my late husband MR.ROBERTS MARTINS. My late husband was a highly reputable busnness magnet-(a cocoa merchant)who operated in the capital of Ivory coast during his days. It is sad to say that he passed away mysteriously in France during one of his business trips abroad on the 22th.December 2003.Though his sudden death was linked or rather suspected to have been masterminded by an uncle of his who travelled with him at that time. But God knows the truth! I had my first and only son Elvis when i was 24 years old and as at then we were happily married.Before his death on December 22 2003 he called the secretary who accompanied him to the hospital and told her that he had a sum of 19.700,000 US DOLLARS (NINETEEN.SEVEN MILLION USA DOLLARS)kept in a security company in (AFRICA). He also said that the security company does not know the content of the safe Box.He decleared it to the company as family treasure and used my son's name ELVIS to Deposit the Box as his only child for next of kin. He also explained to me that it was because of this wealth that he was poisoned by his business assocaites, That I should seek for a foreign partner in a country of my choice where I will transfer this money to and use it for investment purposes. I want you to assist me in clearing this box from the security company and then transfering the fund inside the box into your account overseas as a beneficiary of the fund, and also use it for an investment purpose. I am just a widow and a refugee in a country i don't have family nor friend and i really don't know what to do.Now I want an account overseas where I can transfer this funds. This is because I have suffered a lot of set backs as a result of incessant political crisis in my country LIBERIA and even here in Ivory coast.The death of my husband actually brought sorrow to my son and i. Dearest one,I am in a sincere desire of your humble assistance in this regards .Your suggestions and ideas will be highly regarded. Now permit me to ask these few questions:- 1. Can you honestly help me as your sister or partner? 2. Can I completely trust you? 3. What percentage of the total amount in question will be good for you after the money is in your account? Please,Consider this and get back to me as soon as possible on this my private e-mail address at:charitymartins24@yahoo.fr Thank you so much, Mrs.Charity Martins and SON. Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis. A télécharger gratuitement sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 28 03:01:11 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7SA1B7D014092 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:01:11 -0700 Received: from web25101.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25101.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.49]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7SA19r1010894 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:01:10 -0700 Message-ID: <20040828100109.34865.qmail@web25101.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.136.113.93] by web25101.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:01:09 CEST Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:01:09 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?charity=20martins?= Subject: FROM CHARITY MATINS To: charitymartins24@yahoo.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='SUBJ_ALL_CAPS 0.001, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.001, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0' Respectfull one, Good a thing to write you. I have a proposal for you-this however is not mandatory nor will I in any manner compel you to honour against your will. I am MRS.CHARITY MARTINS,46 years old and the wife of my late husband MR.ROBERTS MARTINS. My late husband was a highly reputable busnness magnet-(a cocoa merchant)who operated in the capital of Ivory coast during his days. It is sad to say that he passed away mysteriously in France during one of his business trips abroad on the 22th.December 2003.Though his sudden death was linked or rather suspected to have been masterminded by an uncle of his who travelled with him at that time. But God knows the truth! I had my first and only son Elvis when i was 24 years old and as at then we were happily married.Before his death on December 22 2003 he called the secretary who accompanied him to the hospital and told her that he had a sum of 19.700,000 US DOLLARS (NINETEEN.SEVEN MILLION USA DOLLARS)kept in a security company in (AFRICA). He also said that the security company does not know the content of the safe Box.He decleared it to the company as family treasure and used my son's name ELVIS to Deposit the Box as his only child for next of kin. He also explained to me that it was because of this wealth that he was poisoned by his business assocaites, That I should seek for a foreign partner in a country of my choice where I will transfer this money to and use it for investment purposes. I want you to assist me in clearing this box from the security company and then transfering the fund inside the box into your account overseas as a beneficiary of the fund, and also use it for an investment purpose. I am just a widow and a refugee in a country i don't have family nor friend and i really don't know what to do.Now I want an account overseas where I can transfer this funds. This is because I have suffered a lot of set backs as a result of incessant political crisis in my country LIBERIA and even here in Ivory coast.The death of my husband actually brought sorrow to my son and i. Dearest one,I am in a sincere desire of your humble assistance in this regards .Your suggestions and ideas will be highly regarded. Now permit me to ask these few questions:- 1. Can you honestly help me as your sister or partner? 2. Can I completely trust you? 3. What percentage of the total amount in question will be good for you after the money is in your account? Please,Consider this and get back to me as soon as possible on this my private e-mail address at:charitymartins24@yahoo.fr Thank you so much, Mrs.Charity Martins and SON. Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis. A télécharger gratuitement sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 28 05:39:36 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 05:39:36 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7SCdaK9018553; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 05:39:36 -0700 Received: from list4.u.washington.edu (list4.u.washington.edu [140.142.14.167]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7SCdYBh011250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 28 Aug 2004 05:39:35 -0700 Received: from host (lists.u.washington.edu [140.142.56.13]) by list4.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7SCdHcW015148; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 05:39:17 -0700 Received: from mxe2.u.washington.edu (mxe2.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.14]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7SCbTnF094014 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 05:37:29 -0700 Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [194.97.50.131]) by mxe2.u.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7SCbPHh028770 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 05:37:26 -0700 Received: from [194.97.50.138] (helo=mx0.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C12SS-0003fY-Jc for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:37:24 +0200 Received: from cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk ([130.225.197.72] helo=localhost) by mx0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID claus.atzenbeck@freenet.de) (Exim 4.42 #2) id 1C12SS-00034o-FK for pine-info@u.washington.edu; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:37:24 +0200 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id B24A58F1142; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:37:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7BB8F1140 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:37:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:37:17 +0200 (CEST) Sender: PINE-INFO-owner@u.washington.edu Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: (Human contact for the list) List-Post: From: Claus Atzenbeck To: Pine Discussion Forum Subject: switch off authentification MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-To: Pine-Info X-X-Sender: claus@cumulus.cs.aue.auc.dk X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0' X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.1 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN Hi, I was using Pine 4.60 and everything was fine. Yesterday I was deinstalling it and have now pine-ssl 4.61. It seems that my IMAP server cannot handle secure connections. Pine complains with: Server disables LOGIN, no recognized SASL authenticator Since my IMAP server is running on localhost (so does Pine) and I am the only user, encryption is not necessary. Can I switch off authentification and let pine-ssl act like pine (without SSL support)? I was playing around with disable-these-authenticators, but without success. Any ideas? Greetings, Claus PS: The reason why I would like to have pine-ssl installed, even if I don't want to use its SSL feature, is that I'm using a package manager (fink) on Mac OS X. It's very convenient. However, the newest Pine version available for fink is pine-ssl, not pine. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/ ----------------------------------------------------------------- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 28 07:07:49 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7SE7mtP020502 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:07:48 -0700 Received: from web50102.mail.yahoo.com (web50102.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.30]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7SE7li9016188 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 07:07:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20040828140747.64241.qmail@web50102.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [192.116.134.202] by web50102.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:07:47 BST Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:07:47 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?debeorisa?= Reply-To: debeorisa@myself.com Subject: Urgent assistance is confidential..... To: pin_kemass2@yahoo.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=95%, Report='NIGERIAN_SUBJECT2 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS 1.598, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, US_DOLLARS_3 1.100, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_1 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_46 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_15 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' Debeorisa Austine, Tel: 874 - 76 - 3648313 Fax: 874 - 76 - 3648315 My name is Debeorisa Austine,I am the operational manager in account management section incharge of credit and foreign bills of one of the prime banks here in South Africa.I am writing in respect of a foreign customer of my bank who perished on EGYPTIAN Boeing 737 PLANE CRASH into the red sea with the whole passengers aboard. There is an account opened in this bank by this great late diamond and oil magnet who died without a written or oral WILL attatched to the account. Since his death I personally has watched with keen interest to see the next of kin but all has proved abortive as no one has come to claim his funds and no other person knows about this account or anything concerning it,the account has no other beneficiary and until his death he was the manager of his company. The total amount involved is 48,223,000.00 USD.[ Forty eight million two hundred and twenty three thousand United States Dollar ].We wish to start the first transfer with $8,000,000.00[Eight million] and upon successful transaction without any disappointment from your side,we shall re-apply for the transfer of the remaining balance to your account. I have secretly discussed this matter with the manager of the bank who I must involve in order to have a smooth and a successful transfer of the fund to any foreign bank account which you are going to nominate. On this note,I want you to act as the foreign beneficiary of the fund from the deceased by providing your bank account where the fund will be transferred for immediate investment on any viable project as no one has come up to be the next of kin. The banking ethics here does not allow such money to stay more than 2 years without claim hence the money will be recalled to the government treasury as unclaimed after this long period of domancy. In view of this I got your contact through my personal search to see if you can assist by providing your safe bank account for the transfer or find a reliable person who will be capable of receiving such amount in his or her personal account.At the conclussion of the transfer 65% of the fund will be for me,I will give you 20% of the total transfer sum, 10% for charity both in Africa and in your country while the remaining 5% will be set aside to settle expenses both parties might incure during the transfer process. Upon the receipt of your reply,I will send to you a detailed information about the transaction.I will not fail to bring to your notice that this business is 100% risk and trouble free and that you should not entertain any fear as all modalities for fund transfer can be finalized within 7 to 9 banking days, after you apply to the bank as the beneficiary of the fund from the deceased. When you receive this letter.Kindly send me an e-mail or you can call me or fax me.You should also include your private fax and phone numbers for easy and safe communication. When you receive this letter, Kindly get back to me through this my privet Email, Tel or Fax : Tel : 874-763648313 : 874-763648314 Fax : 874-763648315 Email: debeorisa@myself.com You should also include your private fax and phone numbers for easy and safe communication. Respectfully Yours, Debeorisa Austine. ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 28 15:20:38 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:20:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7SMKbAH029061 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:20:37 -0700 Received: from web50107.mail.yahoo.com (web50107.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.35]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7SMKaIW008570 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 15:20:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20040828222036.15621.qmail@web50107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [192.116.134.202] by web50107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 23:20:36 BST Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 23:20:36 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?debeorisa?= Reply-To: debeorisa@myself.com Subject: Urgent assistance is confidential..... To: pin_kemass2@yahoo.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIII, Probability=95%, Report='NIGERIAN_SUBJECT2 2.900, URGENT_BIZ 1.799, FROM_HAS_ULINE_NUMS 1.598, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, US_DOLLARS_3 1.100, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_1 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_46 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_15 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __FROM_HAS_UNDERLINE_NUMS 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0' Debeorisa Austine, Tel: 874 - 76 - 3648313 Fax: 874 - 76 - 3648315 My name is Debeorisa Austine,I am the operational manager in account management section incharge of credit and foreign bills of one of the prime banks here in South Africa.I am writing in respect of a foreign customer of my bank who perished on EGYPTIAN Boeing 737 PLANE CRASH into the red sea with the whole passengers aboard. There is an account opened in this bank by this great late diamond and oil magnet who died without a written or oral WILL attatched to the account. Since his death I personally has watched with keen interest to see the next of kin but all has proved abortive as no one has come to claim his funds and no other person knows about this account or anything concerning it,the account has no other beneficiary and until his death he was the manager of his company. The total amount involved is 48,223,000.00 USD.[ Forty eight million two hundred and twenty three thousand United States Dollar ].We wish to start the first transfer with $8,000,000.00[Eight million] and upon successful transaction without any disappointment from your side,we shall re-apply for the transfer of the remaining balance to your account. I have secretly discussed this matter with the manager of the bank who I must involve in order to have a smooth and a successful transfer of the fund to any foreign bank account which you are going to nominate. On this note,I want you to act as the foreign beneficiary of the fund from the deceased by providing your bank account where the fund will be transferred for immediate investment on any viable project as no one has come up to be the next of kin. The banking ethics here does not allow such money to stay more than 2 years without claim hence the money will be recalled to the government treasury as unclaimed after this long period of domancy. In view of this I got your contact through my personal search to see if you can assist by providing your safe bank account for the transfer or find a reliable person who will be capable of receiving such amount in his or her personal account.At the conclussion of the transfer 65% of the fund will be for me,I will give you 20% of the total transfer sum, 10% for charity both in Africa and in your country while the remaining 5% will be set aside to settle expenses both parties might incure during the transfer process. Upon the receipt of your reply,I will send to you a detailed information about the transaction.I will not fail to bring to your notice that this business is 100% risk and trouble free and that you should not entertain any fear as all modalities for fund transfer can be finalized within 7 to 9 banking days, after you apply to the bank as the beneficiary of the fund from the deceased. When you receive this letter.Kindly send me an e-mail or you can call me or fax me.You should also include your private fax and phone numbers for easy and safe communication. When you receive this letter, Kindly get back to me through this my privet Email, Tel or Fax : Tel : 874-763648313 : 874-763648314 Fax : 874-763648315 Email: debeorisa@myself.com You should also include your private fax and phone numbers for easy and safe communication. Respectfully Yours, Debeorisa Austine. ___________________________________________________________ How much mail storage do you get for free? Yahoo! Mail gives you 100MB! Get Yahoo! Mail http://uk.mail.yahoo.com From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sat Aug 28 18:31:39 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7T1VcnX005866 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:31:38 -0700 Received: from web61307.mail.yahoo.com (web61307.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.150]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7T1VZ5Z019608 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:31:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20040829013135.46568.qmail@web61307.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [192.116.134.202] by web61307.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:31:35 EDT Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:31:35 -0400 (EDT) From: errics 9 Reply-To: errics12@yahoo.ca Subject: REQUEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! To: errics9@yahoo.c MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXIII, Probability=53%, Report='NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, SUBJECT_HAS_SPACER 1.309, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, US_DOLLARS_2 0.001, LINES_OF_YELLING 0.001, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __MSGID_BEFORE_RECEIVED 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_1 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0.000, __MSGID_BEFORE_OKAY 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_2 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __PLING_PLING 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, PLING_PLING 0.000' FROM:MR. ARIKO #123CB/PBV,MAIN CITY, JO,BURG, SOUTH AFRICA. PHONE: +:PHONE: +Tel: 874-763-648-313 Fax: 874-76-3648315 (PLEASE REPLY THROUGH MY PRIVATE E-MAIL) {IN EARNEST,EFFICIENT,STRONG AND RELIABLE BUSINESS TRANSACTION} Dear Sir/Ma, Do not be perplexed with this note, It’s all about soliciting your attention to transfer the Sum of{$48Million USD}.{$8M.USD} Will be transferred first, on a solid agreement and well done as agreed by both of us the remaining sum (balance)of $40Million will be transferred accordingly as well. As an Auditor General (AG) an Equivalent of an American, Certified Public Accountant {C.P.A} as well, a personal account officer to the Formal(Diseased), I believe that we can do this business without any Hitch, if only you will be trusted and then follow simple yielding Instructions for a sound smooth success of this Divine mercy(business), as I already had a Dream, of God's presence and endorsement of this business Transaction.We have marshaled out a solid master plan/arrangements on how best to Actualize this laudable objective, so we are not trying to experiment with a transaction of this nature (MAGNITUDE), that will not/never ever come my way again in my life time. Our fears now is if this money will be safe in your custody pending our physical arrival for sharing, etc. If we agree and never to disagree again, you will stand to get 30%,5% for the Orphanage, Poor/Less Privileged, 5% for local and International expenses incurred by both parties on the course of transfer, while the balance of 60% will be for me and my partner. Note: The formal (diseased), died without Oral or writing "WILL" and without any "HIRE", so the formal as a foreigner,because he is a foreigner, this fund can not be released or paid to an Indigene here.IT MUST BE A FOREIGNER WITH A VALID INTERNATIONAL PASS-PORT. So based on this, that is the most reason why you are contacted in regards, as you know INHERITANCE is not a crime all over the world, but will be crime only when you did not follow the Rules, Laws and rocedures of International Inheritance by making triple sure to secureing all the necessary transaction documents to back up the said Inheritance, or other wise. Waiting succinctly your positive response URGENTLY through my private reat regards, ARIKO ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Aug 29 20:56:24 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7U3uM50017913; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:56:22 -0700 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([218.88.106.248]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7U3tfke031143; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 20:56:09 -0700 X-Message-Info: GSSIgBE66pTtkbnWQWCNsrVjcQGLjw06 Received: from neutrino-dns.simmercarnation.com ([122.80.8.213]) by mk8-k41.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:51:11 -0400 Received: from mail.placeholderbicep.com ([178.100.188.176]) by whelp-dns.rosettebicentennial.com (1.77.5/9.12.4) with ESMTP id n0GLmoe4796762 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:51:11 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from blwmorfzhtey@yahoo.com) Received: from [168.226.202.120] (helo=devotion4.compilation40boisterous.com) by mail.chuckleheadmaster.com with esmtp (Exim 1.38) id 2KrilI-9681cN-PK for pine-info-approval@cac.washington.edu; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 02:49:11 -0200 Received: from cost9.diffuse31bamako.com (localhost.divisional51sci.com [127.0.0.1]) by tartar8.polyhymnia26magnuson.com (9.74.5y7/4.47.1) with ESMTP id t5QDsZU3183442 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:49:11 +0500 (CST) (envelope-from blwmorfzhtey@yahoo.com) Received: (from icosahedral@localhost) by motive0.diatomaceous46cloud.com (2.27.5x3/7.34.7/debutante) id p2UUwMG4853207; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 00:49:11 -0400 (CST) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 05:53:11 +0100 (CST) Message-Id: <803795640702.p9YQqUW45438326@deafen1.conspiracy53sud.com> To: pine-info-approval@cac.washington.edu Subject: 5.jpg From: Sherman Thornton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--83748367689615615" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXI, Probability=81%, Report='X_MESSAGE_INFO_HEADER 4.000, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, IP_HTTP_ADDR 1.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __IMGSPAM_TABLE_4_6 0, HTML_70_90 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, IMGSPAM_TABLE_4_6 0.000' ----83748367689615615 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 125percent1oand

    =
    3D""
    3D""

     

    chile coastal armillaria muff yardstick reed
    sheehan teddy ambidextrous corrugate helvetica dinnerware
    emit purchase testicle pitfall calico delude
    downslope knowles wand penna duke citywide
    hartman tug tyrannic vacua bookseller peafowl
    sidecar dietetic crossarm ashtray salve tonic
    newsstand diagram babcock hallway calgary bewhisker
    infest emerald sicily crusoe pervade zoo

     

     

    ----83748367689615615-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Sun Aug 29 23:18:28 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:18:27 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7U6IPTs023186; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:18:25 -0700 Received: from 140.142.32.140 ([61.149.15.75]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7U6I018002186; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:18:17 -0700 Received: from 56.240.61.146 by 61.149.15.75; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:16:18 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Bruce Womack" Reply-To: "Bruce Womack" To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Subject: important changes Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 05:14:18 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--222090137641110" X-Originating-IP: 140.142.32.140 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIIII, Probability=98%, Report='Y_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 8, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, X_NJABL_OPEN_PROXY 1.9, IP_HTTP_ADDR 1.000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __IMGSPAM_TABLE_4_6 0, HTML_70_90 0, RELAY_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, RCVD_IN_NJABL_ORG 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, IMGSPAM_TABLE_4_6 0.000' ----222090137641110 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 125percent1oand

    =
    3D""
    3D""

     

    caught walgreen inhomogeneous yin probity sheraton involutorial browne breakfast slander begotten chromosome
    suppressor psycho coolheaded betide thyroglobulin areawide
    schoolbook duplicity arragon snowy multinomial birch
    genevieve gravitate satiety yves ambient hierarchal
    complicate translucent calculi speedup caricature apportion
    locoweed sightseeing bough although cornish behind
    uniform shipbuilding apprehensive gray convocate aphasic

     

     

    ----222090137641110-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 30 05:47:30 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 05:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7UClTWg022184; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 05:47:29 -0700 Received: from 236194.bhz.virtua.com.br (236194.bhz.virtua.com.br [200.167.236.194]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7UCjJwJ013559; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 05:47:15 -0700 Received: from 207.199.80.221 by 200.167.236.194; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:46:10 -0100 Message-ID: From: "Dave Blue" Reply-To: "Dave Blue" To: pine-faq@cac.washington.edu Subject: Message subject Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:38:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--9248559986111124" X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XI, Probability=11%, Report='IP_HTTP_ADDR 1.000, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, MIME_TEXT_ONLY_MULTI 0' ----9248559986111124 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 125percent1oand

    =
    3D""
    3D""

     

    shrivel respirator fumble mayhem ridicule earmark
    = rally seduce nuclide barbarous grail conversion
    chester canadian grown larch alhambra retrorocket
    hone galvanism bakelite shock sony distillate
    garbage jerk parenthood invigorate meadow sanskrit
    adverb bp philanthropy impetuous congresswoman obsidian
    ingratiate attain guiding cool oocyte arnold
    bespeak musculature hying pollster inspire strode

     

     

    ----9248559986111124-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 30 06:37:19 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7UDbJuQ023751 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:37:19 -0700 Received: from hotmail.com ([218.88.132.209]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7UDb9oQ015051 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:37:16 -0700 Message-Id: <200408301337.i7UDb9oQ015051@mx1.cac.washington.edu> From: "vxce@hotmail.com" Subject: Hello To: pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu Content-Type: text/html;charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: vxce@hotmail.com Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 21:37:25 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXXIIIIIII, Probability=97%, Report='DCC_BULK_HIGH 3.5, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 2.307, FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 2.000, SUB_HELLO 1.599, BULK_EMAIL 1.030, FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS 1.000, CTYPE_JUST_HTML 0.848, MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ 0.048, MAILTO_LINK 0.001, MAILTO_TO_REMOVE 0.001, EMAIL_MARKETING 0.001, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HTML 0, __CTYPE_IS_HTML 0, __NEW_DOMAIN_EXTENSIONS_2 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY 0, __MIME_HTML 0, BIG_FONT 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __DCC_BODY_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ1_MANY 0, __DCC_FUZ2_MANY 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA 0, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0.000, __ANY_OUTLOOK_MUA 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __CTE 0'

    Email Marketing !

      We offer you e-mail addresses databases for advertisement mailing; we sell databases also carry out mailing and hosting for the advertising projects.

    Products

    World Email Lists .  Their validity and originality are verified. Details please go to our website

    Country or area total emails

    America      175 Million Email Address
    Europe       156 Million Email Address
    Asia         168 Million Email Address
    China(PRC)   80 Million Email Address  
    HongKong     3.25 Million Email Address
    TaiWan       2.25 Million Email Address
    Japan        27 Million Email Address 
    Australia    6 Million Email Address
    Canda        10 Million Email Address  
    Russia       38 Million Email Address
    England      22 Million Email Address
    German       40 Million Email Address  
    France       38 Million Email Address
    India        12 Million Email Address
    other Country or Area  

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                 
    Category Name total emails

    Apparel, Fashion, Textiles and Leather  4,654,565
    Automobile & Transportation             6,547,845
    Business Services                       6,366,344
    Chemicals                               3,445,565
    Computer & Telecommunications           654,655
    Construction & Real Estate              3,443,544
    Consumer Electronics                    1,333,443
    Energy, Minerals & Metals               6,765,683
    Environment                             656,533
    Food & Agriculture                      1,235,354                  
    Gems & Jewellery                        565,438
    Health & Beauty                         804,654
    Home Supplies                           323,232
    Industrial Supplies                     415,668
    Office Supplies                         1,559,892
    Packaging & Paper                       5,675,648
    Printing & Publishing                   6,563,445
    Security & Protection                   5,653,494
    Sports & Entertainment                  3,488,455
    Toys, Gifts and Handicrafts             2,135,654
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ¡¤All of Country email lists + email sender express +add url express + etrae express+Ebook
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Send Your Ad to Millions

    20  million bulk email
    50  million bulk email
    100 million bulk email
    200 million bulk email

    Imagine emailing 500,000 recipients and 1 out of every 1000 orders your product, that's 500 new orders!
    * We go all-out to make sure our customers are completely satisfied
    * If any emails fail to make delivery, we replace them free of charge
    * 100% Spam free, rest assured you will not be accused of spamming
    * Almost all of our emails are sent to valid email addresses
    * No software required, we do all the mailing from our own server
    * Don't be fooled in signing up with similar sites offering services that cannot compare to ours
    * Get the most bang for your buck with bulk email advantage!
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    Details go to website


    Thank you!

    the silver star internet information company

    copyright¡¤2004-2005 all reserved


    ------------------------------------------------------------
    remove please email: emailad1234@sina.com
    ------------------------------------------------------------

    From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Mon Aug 30 12:04:56 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx2.cac.washington.edu (mx2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.1]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i7UJ4stg002738; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:04:54 -0700 Received: from 140.142.33.1 ([200.166.89.56]) by mx2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with SMTP id i7UJ4bHQ025756; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:04:47 -0700 Received: from 10.8.74.68 by 200.166.89.56; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:01:44 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Jose Banks" Reply-To: "Jose Banks" To: pine-info@cac.washington.edu Cc: pine-info-approval@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-arch@cac.washington.edu, pine-info-owner@cac.washington.edu, pine-suggestions@cac.washington.edu Subject: account update Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 01:57:44 +0600 X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 224 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--3801724074871392236" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-IP: 207.178.77.214 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXXIIII, Probability=84%, Report='FORGED_MUA_AOL_FROM 4.400, MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI 3.000, IP_HTTP_ADDR 1.000, __HAS_MSN_FROM 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __AOL_MUA 0, __ANY_AOL_MUA 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI 0, __TAG_EXISTS_BODY 0, __MIME_HTML_ONLY 0, __TAG_EXISTS_META 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HEAD 0, __IMGSPAM_TABLE_4_6 0, HTML_70_90 0, __DCC_BODY 0, __DCC_FUZ1 0, __DCC_FUZ2 0, DCC_BULK_LOW 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, IMGSPAM_TABLE_4_6 0.000' ----3801724074871392236 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 125percent1oand

    =
    3D""
    3D""

     

    josef gop economic shrilly vignette choreograph
    walrus subversive veldt creek monic surge
    reich bumptious sold curio amoebae efface
    denial reykjavik above croak impinge surf
    boom apprentice polypropylene birdseed diffuse derriere
    royalty yawn acorn solve illiteracy courthouse
    comprehend loki nearby soya bath breech
    buckwheat transfix ambush grant divine lapse

     

     

    ----3801724074871392236-- From pinedev@shivax2.cac.washington.edu Tue Aug 31 17:42:39 2004 -0700 Return-Path: Received: via tmail-2000(13) (invoked by user mailnull) for mailarch+pine-info; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.cac.washington.edu (mx1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.140]) by groupms.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i810gbI2017416; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:42:38 -0700 Received: from mail.sos.lv ([159.148.46.59]) by mx1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.1+UW04.08/8.13.1+UW04.08) with ESMTP id i810gXDf032520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:42:36 -0700 Received: from mail.sos.lv (mail.sos.lv [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sos.lv (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i810rVCP013441; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 03:53:35 +0300 From: abinarhodes@sos.lv Received: (from apache@localhost) by mail.sos.lv (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i810leRU012870; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 03:47:40 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.sos.lv: apache set sender to abinarhodes@sos.lv using -f Received: from 195.166.237.40 (SquirrelMail authenticated user abinarhodes) by mail.sos.lv with HTTP; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 03:47:40 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <62271.195.166.237.40.1093999660.squirrel@mail.sos.lv> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 03:47:40 +0300 (EEST) Subject: HELLO To: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.10) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=XXXXXXXIII, Probability=73%, Report='SUB_HELLO 1.599, UPPERCASE_75_100 1.489, NIGERIAN_BODY2 1.442, NIGERIAN_BODY1 1.296, MILLION_USD 1.204, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, DEAR_SOMETHING 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_8 0, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_26 0, ACT_NOW 0, __NIGERIAN_BODY_20 0, __UPPERCASE_75_100 0, LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, LINES_OF_YELLING_2 0, LINES_OF_YELLING_3 0, X_AUTH_WARNING 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' DEAR SIR, THIS LETTER MAY COME TO YOU AS A SURPRISE BUT IT WAS OUT OF MY DESIRE TO SHARE THIS MUTUAL PROPOSAL WITH YOU, I GOT YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS THROUGH THE CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE IN NIGERIA. MY NAME IS MR.ABINART RHODES A GENERAL SECRETARY IN INTER CAPITAL SECURITIES COMPANY HERE IN NIGERIA THERE IS A CONSIGNMENT CONTAINING A SUM OF (12,000,000.00USD)TWELVE MILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS DEPOSITED IN OUR COMPANY FOR SAFE KEEPING BY ONE MR. GUEI WALTER BEFORE HIS DEATH, NO ONE HAS COME TO CLAIM THIS CONSIGNMENT AS A BENEFICIARY TILL DATE. I AM HONORABLY SEEKING FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE AS FOLLOWS: (1) I WANT YOU TO ACT AS A BENEFICIARY (2) I WANT YOU TO PROVIDE A BANK ACCOUNT WHERE THIS MONEY WILL BE TRANSFERRED I WILL PROVIDE YOU THE ENTIRE NECESSARY DOCUMENT FOR THIS CONSIGNMENT TO PROVE THE CONSIGNEE AS A BENEFICIARY TO THE COMPANY, 40% OF TOTAL AMAOUNT MAPPED OUT FOR YOU WHILE THE 60% MAPPED OUT FOR ME. IF YOU ARE OKAY WITH MY CONDITION DO NOT HESITATE TO SEND ME -MAIL abina_rhodes@yahoo.co.uk SO THAT I CAN FURNISH YOU UP WITH ALL THE INFORMATION NEEDED, I WISH TO HEAR FROM YOU SOON. THANKS FOR YOUR COOPERATION ABINART RHODES.